Page 30 of 89

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:05 pm
by Ms Marangal
how are you not a utility lynch?

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:15 pm
by TheFuzzylogic99
Kaze
Can you honestly tell me that you believe that if I said what I highlighted that Mara would of not jumped on it and yelled scum.. Not only that but you would of not jumped on me as scum too. If you can honestly say that it would not of happened like that than i will back off.

Mara

No it had nothing to do with the alleged scum slip ( which does not exist) This was off a discussion between Ruffling and you . I answered that allegation earlier. I believe in earlier post .

How is your my accusation about what you say any less valid than what you are saying is a scum slip from me>>>>>

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:22 pm
by pitoli
UNVOTE:

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:22 pm
by TheFuzzylogic99
I am still lost on what this alleged scum slip of mine is bc you never mad it clear.....at least in my opinion.

so far your case against me seems to be I said I am sorry in a post and an alleged scum slip that is not clear

@ kaze
Tell me how the heck that I am grasping at straws more than Mara !!!!!!!

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:33 pm
by TheFuzzylogic99
Image

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:39 pm
by TheFuzzylogic99
@ Kaze
Please explain why her case against me is so valid and mine is so ridiculous !!!!!

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:44 am
by Kazekirimaru
Heh. I only said that to stir you up and see how you reacted. Right now you're looking like a shining example of righteous indignation. I think I can clear you as town.

That said, your stances on mara are still silly. The fact of the matter is I'm pretty sure mara is smart enough to not accidentally say "lol I need to mislynch townies as town" while scum. If anyone said something to that effect I'd automatically assume I were reading the sentence wrong or they were being facetious. Things like that just don't really happen in a forum game where you have an extra barrier between your thoughts and projection of them.

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:33 am
by Ms Marangal
In post 708, Ms Marangal wrote:
In post 680, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:this is how I play even my town game.
This part of the post was supposed to be snipped
this what I thought was the scum slip

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:57 am
by orcinus_theoriginal
rufflig/mara 2013

going to make a case on wednesday maybe i am very busy with exams right now :(

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 7:19 am
by Ms Marangal
Fuck you if you really think I would tell my partner in thread that I don't want to talk to him

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 7:33 am
by orcinus_theoriginal
Yeah I do

We all know you have a habit of being bad at scumbuddy interactions

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 7:40 am
by ProHawk
In post 657, Nachomamma8 wrote: I don't need to have a baseline for scum prohawk in order to call you out for acting differently; all I need is a baseline for town prohawk. I never said you were playing to your scum meta, I said you were playing differently and I think that's because you're scum. Why do I need experience with scum prohawk to say as much?
Take just one minute and think about this for a second.

Am I right in saying that you are trying to say acting not like your town meta is equivalent to scum? This thinking is completely fallacious and wrong.

First, who has more motivation to act like your town-self? A scum role or a town? While town doesn't want to be lynched, its a lot more detrimental as scum to be lynched. They have to act like town to not be lynched. In my opinion people emulating their town-self to a T are more likely to be scum than not. People aren't static.

Second, you aren't taking into consideration roles. People who draw power roles act differently as town-power-roles than they would as vanilla roles. Again it boils down to the risk factor of being lynched.

Therefore, without a scum-baseline to base your read, you fail to consider the other possible scenarios as to why someone isn't playing like you believe that they should. Playing differently is not a scum-tell.

I am pretty sure I had responded to all of your questions and if I hadn't please reiterate which ones I had missed.

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 7:45 am
by ProHawk
In post 664, The Rufflig wrote: MafiaSSK initial foray into the game looks encouraging, but I'd like to see him keep it up.
HA

AHHA

HA.

NO.

VOTE: Rufflig

The hypocrisy of Rufflig is dripping hot. Hypocrisy-fake-fake-scum.
In post 691, The Rufflig wrote: However, there is only so much time that I'm willing to devote to this game.
!!!!!
!!!!
!!!

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 7:51 am
by ProHawk
Tammy, by game-changing, I meant any game I had played with Nacho in. Also, you are no longer a gut-scum-read.

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:05 am
by Deacon Blues
In post 736, ProHawk wrote:
In post 657, Nachomamma8 wrote: I don't need to have a baseline for scum prohawk in order to call you out for acting differently; all I need is a baseline for town prohawk. I never said you were playing to your scum meta, I said you were playing differently and I think that's because you're scum. Why do I need experience with scum prohawk to say as much?
Take just one minute and think about this for a second.

Am I right in saying that you are trying to say acting not like your town meta is equivalent to scum? This thinking is completely fallacious and wrong.

First, who has more motivation to act like your town-self? A scum role or a town? While town doesn't want to be lynched, its a lot more detrimental as scum to be lynched. They have to act like town to not be lynched. In my opinion people emulating their town-self to a T are more likely to be scum than not. People aren't static.
^^ I swear you are channeling me in that response.

Also, I've seen Nacho make exactly that argument about a player playing outside their town meta more than once, which is why his attack seemed so half-assed.
Second, you aren't taking into consideration roles. People who draw power roles act differently as town-power-roles than they would as vanilla roles. Again it boils down to the risk factor of being lynched
.

Therefore, without a scum-baseline to base your read, you fail to consider the other possible scenarios as to why someone isn't playing like you believe that they should. Playing differently is not a scum-tell.

I am pretty sure I had responded to all of your questions and if I hadn't please reiterate which ones I had missed.
^^ This, though, is shit that I spout as any alignment.

And the "therefore..." has a "your attack is without merit" feel, which also leaves me a little ambivalent.

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:11 am
by Kazekirimaru
I'm willing to call ProHawk town, as well.

By Jove, I'm finally starting to solidify reads!

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:18 am
by ProHawk
Did you ever comment about my theory on you Kaze?

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:19 am
by Kazekirimaru
I don't remember. What was it, again?

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:20 am
by ProHawk
That you are scum-clearing Orc so he doesn't get lynched to have you mod-revealed as scum.

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:23 am
by Kazekirimaru
Needs work.

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 9:37 am
by Ms Marangal
VOTE: Orci

Fuck off

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 9:37 am
by Ms Marangal
I could give two shits about you being town

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 9:39 am
by Ms Marangal
In post 735, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Yeah I do

We all know you have a habit of being bad at scumbuddy interactions
this is the worst gond dmdaoif hfuckign comment hyou coulnd have ever, EVER stated

fucking ever

You can talk shit about every other aspect of my play, but you can't talk shit about how I interact with scumbuddies

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 9:43 am
by Kazekirimaru
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Mara

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 9:45 am
by Ms Marangal
VOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciVOTE: orciv
VOTE: orci