Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 6:01 am
4 is a nice number.
Vote:Maz Medias
I can't say I'm surprised byRomanus wrote:Checking in. Can't say I am surprised by my nomination. I want to hear some stuff from our Ghyrt replacement, so
Vote: Rangerofthenorth
QFTJDodge wrote:See? This is what freedom brought us; a cornucopia of opportunity.
I didn't want to be the one to say it. :hifive:JDodge wrote:I can't say I'm surprised byRomanus wrote:Checking in. Can't say I am surprised by my nomination. I want to hear some stuff from our Ghyrt replacement, so
Vote: Rangerofthenorthanyof the nominations.
See? This is what freedom brought us; a cornucopia of opportunity.
DW: Yer theory is broke. We've already established that deciding for ourselves is good, as proven by the fact that we have four people that are suspicious in different ways.DeanWinchester wrote:Ok.
RR is up there because poeple don't like him.
Romanus is up there because of his ability. I believe his ability to be pro-town. Mafia did not kill him because they were not afraid of his ability and hoping the town would lynch him.
Gyhrt and maz are up there because poeple believe they are scum. PERIOD.
We need to say who we nominated. There is little if any info scum can gleam from this.
I nominated gyhrt and maz.
Fos: the poeple that have already voted.
We need to decide TODAY who needs to be lynched tomorow. We need discusion not votes.
How do you know this? Isn't this pretty WIFOM?DeanWinchester wrote:We need to know who everyone nominated. Scum voted together.
Again, WIFOM.We need to figure out who they nominated so we know who not to lynch.
This isn't WIFOM, it's just speculation.I'm thinking they would have put up Romanus and rr.
Good freaking god, is this terrible posting or what?DeanWinchester wrote:We need to know who everyone nominated. Scum voted together.
We need to figure out who they nominated so we know who not to lynch.
I'm thinking they would have put up Romanus and rr.
Because I don't find RR suspicious, I think he's one of those annoying townies that scum like to try and lynch. You latched on to him very quick and didn't let go. It's wicked easy to do that day one and then use "I've always thought he was suspicious" as your reason for voting him when you haven't actually come up with a convincing case.Maz Medias wrote:I want to ask - for the record - why I'm such "suspected scum". If it's because of my nomination position, why isn't JDodge just as suspicious? I haven't really seen any case against me besides "he scum 'cause he not fascist".
Respond plx, Jack? If that's your only reason, I'd think Mariyta would be equally guilty.Mariyta wrote:Easy. I voted RR and Dean, two scumbuddies.
She's also a replacement, so she couldn't have voted him on page 2. I am, however, fairly sure that she was on him almost immediately after replacing in.Jack wrote:She voted him after 20 pages or so and after he'd disappeared; you voted him page 2 I wouldn't say it's the same at all.
I did indeed, and I suspected Dean almost immediately due to his absolute and utter insistance that RR was town. And I'm still amazed that no one else thought it awfully off.Maz Medias wrote:She's also a replacement, so she couldn't have voted him on page 2. I am, however, fairly sure that she was on him almost immediately after replacing in.Jack wrote:She voted him after 20 pages or so and after he'd disappeared; you voted him page 2 I wouldn't say it's the same at all.
That you suspected them, or that Dean defended him?Mariyta wrote:I did indeed, and I suspected Dean almost immediately due to his absolute and utter insistance that RR was town. And I'm still amazed that no one else thought it awfully off.Maz Medias wrote:She's also a replacement, so she couldn't have voted him on page 2. I am, however, fairly sure that she was on him almost immediately after replacing in.Jack wrote:She voted him after 20 pages or so and after he'd disappeared; you voted him page 2 I wouldn't say it's the same at all.