Page 30 of 47

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:19 pm
by Seiko x Naomi
I still think is a good post, and I generally think his posts across the recent pages are bleeding town ( is another post that resonated with me a lot).

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:22 pm
by borkjerfkin
i feel like 460 is null because it's just addressing points on him; i feel like he's going to try to downplay those regardless of alignment.

also dunn thinks that's a misrep of his stance.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:24 pm
by borkjerfkin
In post 724, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 720, borkjerfkin wrote:'set to be lynched'?
He wasn't under pressure
untrue; AJ, SxN and SS wanted to lynch him, I expressed interest

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:25 pm
by Seiko x Naomi
In post 726, borkjerfkin wrote:i feel like 460 is null because it's just addressing points on him; i feel like he's going to try to downplay those regardless of alignment.

also dunn thinks that's a misrep of his stance.
it isn't. in fact, Dunn's read on S_S is one of his reads that I had an issue with, so I think it's perfectly reasonable that he would take issue with it.

the thing he said about OA is literally what OA's read on him was, and similarly that's the primary reason I took issue with OA back when they were still in the slot.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:35 pm
by borkjerfkin
VOTE: Pers

I'll be honest, I am trying to squint and see town tells from SS and I barely have anything. I don't think much has changed about him for me since I posted my read list.

This is a sheep from me to you because I trust you more than I trust anyone on the S_S wagon.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:37 pm
by Seiko x Naomi
the thing I really, really hate the absolute most about Persi is his reaction to Charl's claim.

that just isn't how town would react. at all. I read it purely as him hoping to test the waters to see if a Charl lynch is possible.

p-edit: thank you. at this point I guess we just wait for Syr and then one other person.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:39 pm
by borkjerfkin
I voted dunn because I hated how he handled the Charloux situation, like he was testing to see if anyone was gonna bite on lynching Char, a blatantly antitown thing to do, especially if the progression goes

we as town decide to uncover lynch target -> char reveals ss -> ss is town -> ss gets NKed before lylo -> now we're down someone who was pretty obviously town and scum can't kill without having to deal with some consequences

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:40 pm
by borkjerfkin
In post 730, Seiko x Naomi wrote:the thing I really, really hate the absolute most about Persi is his reaction to Charl's claim.

that just isn't how town would react. at all. I read it purely as him hoping to test the waters to see if a Charl lynch is possible.

p-edit: thank you. at this point I guess we just wait for Syr and then one other person.
It's another huge reason I'm reading AJ as town now. I loved his reaction to Charloux

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:40 pm
by Syryana
Beeeetlejuice

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:41 pm
by Syryana
You rang, pie?

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:42 pm
by borkjerfkin
I'm still sus of syr because he's got the same kind of selective response thing that dunn has going on

maybe i'm too demanding

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:43 pm
by Syryana
There's just no pleasing you is there bork

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:43 pm
by borkjerfkin
dunno piescience managed it just fine

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:47 pm
by Seiko x Naomi
can you really not see all the conviction in S_S recent posts? I think on a general level, that's what I'm so inclined to town read about it - he isn't a particularly loud player but I can still feel it.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:47 pm
by Syryana
Well, yippee for piescience.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:48 pm
by Seiko x Naomi
In post 734, Syryana wrote:You rang, pie?
I don't really need anything in particular, except you plan on voting Persi with us, right?

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:48 pm
by Shadow_step
I'm going to be so devastated of Dunn is scum and doesn't get lynched.
I will move to persivul if Dunn lynch doesn't go through.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:50 pm
by Syryana
Seiko x Naomi wrote:
In post 734, Syryana wrote:You rang, pie?
I don't really need anything in particular, except you plan on voting Persi with us, right?
That's the idea. Kind of wanted the hammer for personal reasons, but meh.

VOTE: Persivul

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:53 pm
by Seiko x Naomi
In post 731, borkjerfkin wrote:I voted dunn because I hated how he handled the Charloux situation, like he was testing to see if anyone was gonna bite on lynching Char, a blatantly antitown thing to do, especially if the progression goes

we as town decide to uncover lynch target -> char reveals ss -> ss is town -> ss gets NKed before lylo -> now we're down someone who was pretty obviously town and scum can't kill without having to deal with some consequences
I've stated before that I take issue with a lot of Dunn's stances. the way he approached Charl was one of them.

I probably would join you there if it weren't for the fact that notty doesn't want it.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:55 pm
by borkjerfkin
oddly enough is the post that looks towniest to me from SS, mainly because I think it has no agenda behind it and it doesn't attempt to posture, it's just "I'm wary of him because I've been burned"

that is about all i have

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 6:00 pm
by borkjerfkin
I still think dunn's and are really awkwardly timed and filled with a level of certainty that he never even hinted at at any point in the game before then.

I want notty to weigh meta (and show me a little more than vague tonal stuff) against that.

It doesn't help that he apparently used first vote of the day on somehow who i am about as positive as i can be is town. I'm guessing that his power isn't very good for whoever he used that vote on.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 6:01 pm
by borkjerfkin
In post 745, borkjerfkin wrote:It doesn't help that he apparently used first vote of the day on
someone*
who i am about as positive as i can be is town. I'm guessing that his power isn't very good for whoever he used that vote on.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 6:02 pm
by borkjerfkin
I would also expect clever scum to try to start a counterwagon from town onto town; hell check the EoSD scum PT i'm pretty sure I talk about that there

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 6:09 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 731, borkjerfkin wrote:I voted dunn because I hated how he handled the Charloux situation, like he was testing to see if anyone was gonna bite on lynching Char, a blatantly antitown thing to do, especially if the progression goes
But it's not blatantly anti-town, revealing a town forces scum to kill someone that we would have lynched anyway, or reveals scum. Or let's someone be an ic

Also, unless you think I'm scum with shadow I don't know why you think as scum I'd want to lynch someone who can clear someone rather than a random town


Still waiting for an answer as to why shadow's claim warranted unvotes: bork and syr

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 6:10 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 745, borkjerfkin wrote:I still think dunn's 351 and 352 are really awkwardly timed and filled with a level of certainty that he never even hinted at at any point in the game before then.
It was never hinted because I couldn't vote.