Mafiascum.net

In post 3, Firebringer wrote:

Game is about to begin.
A final word from your friendly and patient moderator:

Recent site meta has given to trend of "Hyper activity" type games. I expect this game might have this same problem, especially given the number of players in this game. I will not regulate any player from being too active, but I do ask when you post to consider other people when you are playing. Play the game to your enjoyment of course, but understand other people may have hard time keeping up if you are making more than a hundred posts in a hour.

This is a big game. I don't want to have to deal with mass replacements because of "too active and I can't keep up".

Also understand, I am ONE person. I can't be here at all times.
I will try to do at least three vote counts per real life day at a MINIMUM.
But I am not perfect. Please be patient.

Thanks everyone, and I hope you all have fun and enjoy.

Cheers,
Firebringer the best mod 2k17

Seriously though, I came back prepared to read like 20 pages to find 34, Heh, Will see if I can finish them within this hour... sigh

In post 722, Not Chara wrote:

In post 718, Not Fury wrote:

In post 717, Not Chara wrote:i'd vote Rach too.
711 is lame. Fury's original Ramcius vote was obviously a joke.

his response doesn't make me think he's town though.

that's why i said original. i'm voting Ramcius too.

I am in your pocket.

^
not the real NC

In post 716, Not Fury wrote:

In post 711, Ramcius wrote:

In post 699, Not Fury wrote:every post where you mentioned RB. Now you're just lying. You aren't even arguing with RB lul

Semantics, anyway, i had never said anything about you, discussion was going for rb/titus mason/whatever claim and that it's not make them conf town in my eyes

P-edit: my vote scummy? i clearly wrote OMGUS, after you voted me for literally no reason (i was referring titus/rb, not you, heck, even my vote was on titus back then), so when you look for scummy votes, look up yours

If you say OMGUS and vote for me for that reasoning, then clearly the OMGUS vote should be on you.

It's like the chimpanzee behind bars calling the woman at the zoo an idiot.

why you taking so serious OMGUS vote? As would Trans say - "why you so defensive?"

_|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|
___|___|I will spoiler text|___|___|___|__
_|___|___|from my posts.|___|___|___|
___|___|___|Just 4 u.|___|___|___|___|__
_|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|

Fury's in the better NC's pocket. you should join her.

but really, you can have that acronym. ;> i'm Chara.

In post 729, Ramcius wrote:

In post 716, Not Fury wrote:

In post 711, Ramcius wrote:

In post 699, Not Fury wrote:every post where you mentioned RB. Now you're just lying. You aren't even arguing with RB lul

Semantics, anyway, i had never said anything about you, discussion was going for rb/titus mason/whatever claim and that it's not make them conf town in my eyes

P-edit: my vote scummy? i clearly wrote OMGUS, after you voted me for literally no reason (i was referring titus/rb, not you, heck, even my vote was on titus back then), so when you look for scummy votes, look up yours

If you say OMGUS and vote for me for that reasoning, then clearly the OMGUS vote should be on you.

It's like the chimpanzee behind bars calling the woman at the zoo an idiot.

why you taking so serious OMGUS vote? As would Trans say - "why you so defensive?"

Quick in response to scum? Yes. So, am I being defensive? Yes.

In post 729, Ramcius wrote:why you taking so serious OMGUS vote? As would Trans say - "why you so defensive?"

711 indicates some amount of seriousness, as does what you said when you voted her, besides the OMGUS part.
you can't have your joke-vote and your scumread too.

In post 719, Wall wrote:_|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|
___|___|___|I vote for|___|___|___|__
_|___|___|___|many reasons.|___|___|___|
___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|__
_|___|___|I do have some mild|___|___|___|
___|___|___|scumreads though.|___|___|__
_|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|

Care to summarize what those scum reads are?

~Ramona

In post 733, Not Chara wrote:

In post 729, Ramcius wrote:why you taking so serious OMGUS vote? As would Trans say - "why you so defensive?"

711 indicates some amount of seriousness, as does what you said when you voted her, besides the OMGUS part.
you can't have your joke-vote and your scumread too.

My gut told me scum, but you told me why I thought that. Thank you.

Rach, why does it matter if Wall has played with you before? why does them calling you 'Rach' indicate that? and why are you so concerned with someone that's 'probably town for the gimmick' in a game with 32 players?

In post 725, ZZZX wrote:

In post 3, Firebringer wrote:

Game is about to begin.
A final word from your friendly and patient moderator:

Recent site meta has given to trend of "Hyper activity" type games. I expect this game might have this same problem, especially given the number of players in this game. I will not regulate any player from being too active, but I do ask when you post to consider other people when you are playing. Play the game to your enjoyment of course, but understand other people may have hard time keeping up if you are making more than a hundred posts in a hour.

This is a big game. I don't want to have to deal with mass replacements because of "too active and I can't keep up".

Also understand, I am ONE person. I can't be here at all times.
I will try to do at least three vote counts per real life day at a MINIMUM.
But I am not perfect. Please be patient.

Thanks everyone, and I hope you all have fun and enjoy.

Cheers,
Firebringer the best mod 2k17

GUYS

REMEBER WHEN YOUR MOD POSTED THIS

FOR FUCKS SAKE LOL

Seriously though, I came back prepared to read like 20 pages to find 34, Heh, Will see if I can finish them within this hour... sigh

This guy is town. I can't keep up with this game right now, and I think scum would prefer it that way. I have to skim everything at this point, and with a game this large, people can hide forever and never be called out. They can also shit post 1000x with one liners and pretend they're town just through activity. It's why I think doggo is scum, but whatever. The super active players are on my shit list, especially when they aren't actually saying anything.

Pedit: I agree with NC. Why does rach care so much about if they played with wall before? It's just weird.

In post 691, Titus wrote:

In post 683, Cerberus v666 wrote:

In post 337, Titus wrote:

In post 334, RachMarie wrote:rb why are you so sure that titus is town?

titus why are you so sure that rb is town

I know you are joking around but it makes me suspicious though other than not seeing a titus death tunnel, I am not seeing anything that points to scum titus here.

The mod told me so.

I'd rather flavorfish than scumhunt. Don't mind me.

I'm going to need a very good explanation for why you did this Titus.

I have the best explanations ever. They're amazing. Their so good I already did them. What was I explaining again?

Have you seen Cowboy Bebop or read the wiki?

I am intimately familiar Bebop. Yes, I caught your crew references and crumbs and such. None of that explains your statement that the moderator told you RB is town.

In post 733, Not Chara wrote:

In post 729, Ramcius wrote:why you taking so serious OMGUS vote? As would Trans say - "why you so defensive?"

711 indicates some amount of seriousness, as does what you said when you voted her, besides the OMGUS part.
you can't have your joke-vote and your scumread too.

Some? it was all serious. She dropped vote on me for wrong reasons, i explained she wrong and that i don't want deal with her today, yet she brought up all my interactions with rb to prove i wasn't arguing with him despite we had quite some discussion about his claim, my vote was on titus - supposed rb mason/whatever partner. It's Fury, who made it serious just because got offended or whatever by OMGUS vote, so i don't feel any guilty to going hard on her now

In post 737, Tywin Lannister wrote:

Spoiler:

In post 725, ZZZX wrote:

In post 3, Firebringer wrote:

Game is about to begin.
A final word from your friendly and patient moderator:

Recent site meta has given to trend of "Hyper activity" type games. I expect this game might have this same problem, especially given the number of players in this game. I will not regulate any player from being too active, but I do ask when you post to consider other people when you are playing. Play the game to your enjoyment of course, but understand other people may have hard time keeping up if you are making more than a hundred posts in a hour.

This is a big game. I don't want to have to deal with mass replacements because of "too active and I can't keep up".

Also understand, I am ONE person. I can't be here at all times.
I will try to do at least three vote counts per real life day at a MINIMUM.
But I am not perfect. Please be patient.

Thanks everyone, and I hope you all have fun and enjoy.

Cheers,
Firebringer the best mod 2k17

GUYS

REMEBER WHEN YOUR MOD POSTED THIS

FOR FUCKS SAKE LOL

Seriously though, I came back prepared to read like 20 pages to find 34, Heh, Will see if I can finish them within this hour... sigh

This guy is town. I can't keep up with this game right now, and I think scum would prefer it that way. I have to skim everything at this point, and with a game this large, people can hide forever and never be called out. They can also shit post 1000x with one liners and pretend they're town just through activity. It's why I think doggo is scum, but whatever. The super active players are on my shit list, especially when they aren't actually saying anything.

Pedit: I agree with NC. Why does rach care so much about if they played with wall before? It's just weird.

Tywin, how you can say this after timeshifted? Your long post before and this post gives me feeling like you scum again trying blend in without making lot posts

I was in 1 game during timeshifted, was scum, and it has like 13 players. It's also why I don't SR you now, because you TR all scum (defended them even), made tons of scummy posts, and I only NK'd you because you were a PR (actually I didn't choose it,Nero did I think). So if you're town, scum are probably everyone you TR.

TRANSCEND'S OPINIONS (might throw what giga has to say in there too)

Cerebrus v666 - towny but am aware he has a bomb ass scum game
mhsmith0
Shiro - null
Carnelian - null, this is probably yume but you're not coasting the game on a miller claim zzz
DanelerH - scummy
Insomniacs (Narna+Mathblade) - town for now
Davesaz - me null slight town, giga town
Not Chara - town
Not Fury - really not sure anymore, we were both thinking town but ehhhh
Majiffy - null
Almost50 - town??
Master Vampire (Nosferatu+BTD6_Maker) - null
Tywin Lannister - town
ZZZX - prob town
Socrates - null
Tarkus - prob town
Kidamn - bouncing between town n scum
Gamma Emerald - probably town
Nero Cain - pretty sure town
Rb - town
RachMarie - probably town
PeregrineV - nullish town
Randomidget - slightly scummy
Titus - town
TheRealGin-N-Tonic - town from what i remember
Siblings Quarrel (Fro99er and Alisae) - scummy
Wall - town most likely
GinghamDog - replacement nai null
Scott and Ramona (Chickadee and LUV) - was thinking scummy but recent posting is good. not something scum!uzi isn't capable of faking.
Ramcious - scummy but could be lynchbait
SlySly - scummy like actually really scummy holy fuck

VOTE: SlySly

oops i skipped smith.

giga hard townreads him

smith is naaturally scummy to him, but i'm willing to trust his read there

In post 243, SlySly wrote:Not Fury is obvtown.

In post 415, SlySly wrote:Wall should be untouchable. This game could be 4000 pages long. Anyone that disturbs the commitment to the self-imposed post restriction should be PL'd or policy NK'd.

In post 417, SlySly wrote:

In post 414, Gamma Emerald wrote:Note to self: beware drunk posters.

ah, the irony that it was me who posted first after this. cheers!

In post 438, SlySly wrote:

In post 427, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:

In post 415, SlySly wrote:Wall should be untouchable. This game could be 4000 pages long. Anyone that disturbs the commitment to the self-imposed post restriction should be PL'd or policy NK'd.

In post 416, RachMarie wrote:I think so he has is ducking my question by saying the wall will not break or some such

Can both of you either rephrase or explain more these sentences because I'm not at the level of understanding what you're implying

This game could go on for months. Wall's genius alter ego should be given a free pass with the condition the Wall never leave character. Anyone trying to kill Wall off is going against the spirit of awesomeness and should be instantly policy killed like a red headed step miller. On the other hand, if the Wall does "break" character, it should be followed by an instant day vig.

In post 492, SlySly wrote:

In post 453, rb wrote:SlySly - Wall is cool and all and I certainly am delighted by his persona and have said so.

but why are your only real contributions to the thread about this persona?

After happy hour and wine later, reading Wall made me envision him dreaming about Wall posts for months and being in meetings at work thinking of ways to top his own greatness. It's a self imposed flogging. It's still making me laugh.

My first post about Not Fury was a real contribution. One word, pineapples.

ctrl+f scumhunting not found

just useless buddying imo

like the first two posts are disgusting. mostly the second one tbh

TO ME*

THEIR*

In post 706, Randomnamechange wrote:

In post 30, Tarkus wrote:3, 2, 1
Let's VOTE: Cerebrus v666!

goodpost

In post 49, Cerberus v666 wrote:I've yoked my vote to randomidget. We're going to see if his claim that his reads are great is actually true.

If someone can create hoods, make one for me and random please, so his reads can fuel my drive and we can carry you to a victory. ^^
VOTE: Siblings Quarrel

squad

In post 263, Cerberus v666 wrote:Eh. Nobody pushed me to be more active? I just decided to respond to things, but I was at zero effort, analytically, throughout..mostly.

@GE: idk man, lol, he just made a comment in the signup thread about how his reads are always great but he can't get anyone to listen to him, while I'm quite good at getting people to listen to me, so I decided I'd help him push his lynches this game.

Oh, aboutrenyonw to caveat random: if we're in 3p lylo, I will vote for you EVERY time. Just so you don't get any crazy ideas about riding me to the end game..;p

i have never had an incorrect read in any large theme ever.
also we're NKing you one phase before LyLo then
VOTE: rachmarie
will respond with reads and stuff later

I think you mean you've never had an incorrect read in a large theme ever...except on me, yes? Because I do recall a certain SU2 that Drixx and I were a hair's breadth from winning...

In post 741, Tywin Lannister wrote:I was in 1 game during timeshifted, was scum, and it has like 13 players. It's also why I don't SR you now, because you TR all scum (defended them even), made tons of scummy posts, and I only NK'd you because you were a PR (actually I didn't choose it,Nero did I think). So if you're town, scum are probably everyone you TR.

only TR was on you from all scumteam there, but it wasn't my point here, point is that you pushing false agenda and your play reminds your play from timeshifted, your first post in here felt like we back in timeshifted second one was obv attempt to buddy and calling someone town for literally NAI reason

VOTE: Tywin

okay are you trying to get lynched ramcius

srs question