Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:10 am
Okay whoIn post 723, RadiantCowbells wrote:so from one perspective this is sort of easy: I have 3 townreads and 2 null-scum reads.
Okay whoIn post 723, RadiantCowbells wrote:so from one perspective this is sort of easy: I have 3 townreads and 2 null-scum reads.
In post 718, UnaBombaH wrote:So scum already know what happened tonight.
So I'm going to straight up ask RC, were you the target last night?
No need to dance around the question anymore.
Like I said the previous day, I now trust you, where do we go from here?
To mod: I'm at a caravan site until sunday morning (gmt +3), but if all goes well, I can participate with my phone.
Small chance I don't have Internet action at times, and I need to spend time with my godson.
Feel like one of these came from scumIn post 719, WhaleBarnicle wrote:what.
That can only mean one of three options:
1) RadCow is telling the truth about BP and was targeted last night. Scum must have not trusted that claim though because why the hell would they waste a night kill on him?
2) RadCow is actually doctor (He could have claimed BP knowing that there would be no CC since he is the doctor) to avoid him getting killed in the night and correctly saved who was targeted. If this is the case, who did you save RadCow? That person is now confirmed town.
I can't see scum just passing up the opportunity to at least try for a night kill. That just wouldn't benefit them at all, right? I don't think the possible confusion it could cause town would be worth the extra person they have for voting.
I'm more interested in this though. Since this is MYLO why not just come right out and say them? (Genuine question from a newbie)In post 723, RadiantCowbells wrote:I have 3 townreads and 2 null-scum reads.
this was the only nightkill that was ever going to be made.In post 731, Miles Edgeworth wrote:The only conclusion I can make about the nightkill is that scum felt the risk of keeping a fresh set of eyes in the game was worth leaving us with an additional suspect to consider. I don't think we can make realistic guesses about why that's the case without knowing who the scumteam is, so we shouldn't waste time on that line of questioning.
Didn't know dropping hammers is scummyIn post 728, WhaleBarnicle wrote:Wheme you're on here, what say you about last night? Why shouldn't we all think its you, the person who so gleefully dropped the hammer with very little reason?
I realize my 180 on him looked pretty weird but it was more an epiphany than that anything had changed. I had been suspicious of Wheme for unmotivated vote changes, but then I suddenly understood the intuition of one of his votes and that made me realize he was being opaque rather than arbitrary.In post 736, Miles Edgeworth wrote:I take it back, I think Persephone is a more reasonable partner than Una for Wheme. I think it's still pretty close, but rereading her progression on Wheme, something isn't right.
So you say that you were suspicious of him solely because of him changing his votes without explaining his motivation?In post 738, PersephoneSidekick wrote:I realize my 180 on him looked pretty weird but it was more an epiphany than that anything had changed. I had been suspicious of Wheme for unmotivated vote changes, but then I suddenly understood the intuition of one of his votes and that made me realize he was being opaque rather than arbitrary.In post 736, Miles Edgeworth wrote:I take it back, I think Persephone is a more reasonable partner than Una for Wheme. I think it's still pretty close, but rereading her progression on Wheme, something isn't right.
Why's thatIn post 740, RadiantCowbells wrote:Wheme, I want to lynch you right now.
More that, in the absence of him explaining his motivations, I could think of scum motivations but not couldn't think of town ones. But then I could.In post 739, Miles Edgeworth wrote:So you say that you were suspicious of him solely because of him changing his votes without explaining his motivation?In post 738, PersephoneSidekick wrote:I realize my 180 on him looked pretty weird but it was more an epiphany than that anything had changed. I had been suspicious of Wheme for unmotivated vote changes, but then I suddenly understood the intuition of one of his votes and that made me realize he was being opaque rather than arbitrary.In post 736, Miles Edgeworth wrote:I take it back, I think Persephone is a more reasonable partner than Una for Wheme. I think it's still pretty close, but rereading her progression on Wheme, something isn't right.
And that was sufficient for you to move off of him? Nothing else he did was sufficiently suspicious for you to keep your vote on him?In post 743, PersephoneSidekick wrote:More that, in the absence of him explaining his motivations, I could think of scum motivations but not couldn't think of town ones. But then I could.In post 739, Miles Edgeworth wrote:So you say that you were suspicious of him solely because of him changing his votes without explaining his motivation?In post 738, PersephoneSidekick wrote:I realize my 180 on him looked pretty weird but it was more an epiphany than that anything had changed. I had been suspicious of Wheme for unmotivated vote changes, but then I suddenly understood the intuition of one of his votes and that made me realize he was being opaque rather than arbitrary.In post 736, Miles Edgeworth wrote:I take it back, I think Persephone is a more reasonable partner than Una for Wheme. I think it's still pretty close, but rereading her progression on Wheme, something isn't right.
It was fine. Obviously wrong in hindsight, but besides being wrong I'm not bothered by it, since so many people replaced during day 1. It got people to put their money where their mouths were, which is the main thing you want in a d1 lynch anyway (aside from hitting scum obviously).In post 746, RadiantCowbells wrote:in hindsight lynching fykus was a brutal mistake.