Mafiascum.net

In post 721, Purrcocet wrote:if Nancy Drew 39 is town moments push on her is super duper sus

BUT THATS JUST MY OPINON

Just because someone is town, it doesn't mean the people pushing them is scum, but okay.

In post 722, Nosferatu wrote:

In post 720, Dunnstral wrote:None of what you jsut said gives a reason to vote Moment

ye ok but he's either town or not, do you think he's town?

yes

In post 726, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 722, Nosferatu wrote:

In post 720, Dunnstral wrote:None of what you jsut said gives a reason to vote Moment

ye ok but he's either town or not, do you think he's town?

yes

ok why

That isn't how this works, people who are voting him (including you) need to explain why he is a good vote (vs just naked voting him with approaching deadline)

no we really dont

anyone who reads the game can see hes scum

and that you are scum

I guess this conversation is over then

it was over before it started

you just needed an excuse to posture

Just realized there are no activity rules in the ruleset, so that's nice

In post 728, Dunnstral wrote:That isn't how this works, people who are voting him (including you) need to explain why he is a good vote (vs just naked voting him with approaching deadline)

ive made my intentions with this wagon pretty clear so if youre saying this then youre just being complicit in lynching him and the whole "but the burden of proof!!" shenanigans are useless.

dont worry friends, it cant end up worse than Touhou UCanPick 5™

---o-- --- -------

In post 583, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:If there is scum on my wagon, I lean the most to moment and Katsuke. I still don’t even know why he voted for me and I wasn’t impressed for the reason he gave for voting for you either. I still feel worse about moment. There were also some weird posts he made to Kade and Human that seemed off to me. One post that stood out to me is when he accused Kaede of not having a valid thought process for a completely reasonable comment that she had made. It never made any sense to me how he read that into her post.

Nancy, something I'm curious about: earlier you expressed the opinion that "Wolves don’t usually push d1 wagons, due to the much greater chance to mislynch." (376) When did that change for you with regards to me?

-------

In post 595, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:It just seems to le that he reads scummy intent into things that don’t necessarily follow and as far as the alleged Wisdom/Kaede mindmeld on hebi, I see nothing unusual about it.

You see about someone going from "now you have removed any doubt in my mind that you are scum" (161) to voting alongside that same person?

-------

In post 598, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Probably Katsuki and Hebi. Katsuki has done absolutely nothing villagery and he is defending Hebi pretty hard.

In post 600, Wisdom wrote:Im actually less confident on hebi flipping red after a red moment flip

The bs reasoning he gave for his townread on her as well as the defending hes been doing feel more like wking than defending a buddy

I'm going to respond to both of these together because I feel they both put forward the same fallacious argument, that I've hard defended hebichan. The reality is that I had a light townread on her for her opening, saw something suspicious about people voting together (only tangentially related to Hebichan, and more about the people voting than the person voted), and questioned Human Sequencer's reasoning.


-------
One moment, posting from phone now.

oh is moment playing hangman too?

i

In post 609, Wisdom wrote:For whoever has a little time on their hands;

Good read: Perpetual Mylo III

Features:
-Me catching a verbose and manipulative scum yet nobody listening to me
-Scum Dunnstral shading me
-Scum Kaede

I think people would be more interested in your reasoning for me being scum specifically rather than just a singular example of you catching scum; I'm certain there have been similar games where you were incorrect, and games where you acted this way and were scum. In terms of reasons to follow someone on a vote, this isn't a very good one.

At the very least, that's what be more interested in.

--------

zMuffinMan wrote:oh is moment playing hangman too?

i

I wasn't before, but I'll take an 'S', please, Pat.

In post 620, Wisdom wrote:Town: {Nancy, andriod, Kokichi, HS, Nos}
Nulltown: {Katsuki, Purrcocet, Brian, mastina}
Null: {Kaede, muffin, Ginngie}
Nullscum: {hebi, grapes}
Scum: {Dunn, Moment}

Why are you scumreading grapes?

------

In post 626, zMuffinMan wrote: ginngie's total lack of actual content despite so many posts is a pretty good indicator of scum, IMO (i also have issues with what he

has

chosen to comment on, but i'm not particularly interested in explaining it since i think it should plainly obvious and if it isn't, i don't really have the energy to bother going into detail)

im not particularly interested in strongarming lynches in this game or taking it too seriously (at least not right now) so i don't particularly care about trying to prove you wrong or anything

I disagree with this philosophy pretty strongly. If you're town, it's your responsibility to try to win, and that means explaining and pushing for your scumreads. I'm talking specifically about your reasons on Ginngie here; people seem to just be ignoring him and whatever you have to say could change that.

I can understand not being motivated, but at the very least an effort should be made, especially considering what you're doing with your vote.

In post 739, FakeGod wrote:

Ankamius replaces hebichan.

What just happened

the point of that game is to show why dunn is scum, not to show im good at catching scum
thats already known

Good morning everyone!

I'll sink my teeth into this game hopefully today, depending on how much I'm overheating throughout.

In post 742, Wisdom wrote:the point of that game is to show why dunn is scum, not to show im good at catching scum
thats already known

this reminds me, kokichi had a good point about wisdom never making jokes

hmm

In post 740, Moment wrote:I can understand not being motivated, but at the very least an effort should be made, especially considering what you're doing with your vote.

it's not a lack of motivation, per se. im just not so interested in getting people lynched atm. i am liking just playing the role of observer and drawing my own conclusions (right or wrong) about things without being invested in who gets lynched

right now i am the mild-mannered bruce muffner

some day soon i may transform into the incredibl(y lacklustr)e mulk and MULK SMASH but that day is not this day

In post 729, Wisdom wrote:no we really dont

anyone who reads the game can see hes scum

and that you are scum

Ah, of course.

(Is this something people actually believe?)

------

In post 733, Nosferatu wrote:

In post 728, Dunnstral wrote:That isn't how this works, people who are voting him (including you) need to explain why he is a good vote (vs just naked voting him with approaching deadline)

ive made my intentions with this wagon pretty clear so if youre saying this then youre just being complicit in lynching him and the whole "but the burden of proof!!" shenanigans are useless.

Could you restate those intentions for me, if you don't mind? I don't recall hearing you ever actually scumread me and on a review of you ISO all I see is this:



...followed by you asking more people to vote me.

-------
Seems I'm caught up now. My preferred lynches are either Nancy or Ginngie, but it doesn't seem particularly likely that either of those would go through today. Nosferatu is actually a wagon I could get behind, thinking more, and Kaede is one I could vote, although I don't have that strong of a scumread on her.

and : I don't think either of the wagons you're on will be going through today. Thoughts on a Nosferatu wagon? Alternatively, convince me to vote with you?

I'd also like to hear everyone's thoughts on Ginngie, although from how the game has gone so far I don't expect that to be a viable wagon.

In post 672, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:

In post 5, Kokichi Oma wrote:If we dont lynch for 5 real time days I get an ability

I hope you werent lying

Me? Lying? Would I ever?