Page 30 of 189
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:02 am
by tris
In post 720, xRECKONERx wrote:wait lemme do my tris impression
"im gonna try to hammer someone THEN worry about forming actual reads"
like what
p.edit: i have zero interest in anything outside of a lurker lynch right now and approximately 0% of the "points" or "cases" made against NSMA hold any weight in my head bc theyre all METAMETAMETAMETAMETAMETAMETA and meta is fucking garbage
I didn't try to hammer anyone. I knew my vote was already there. It was intentionally fake.
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:03 am
by Ankamius
I don't think tris specifically gambits a fake hammer and then plays like she did
it's an awkward progression
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:03 am
by Ankamius
In post 720, xRECKONERx wrote:wait lemme do my tris impression
"im gonna try to hammer someone THEN worry about forming actual reads"
this is actually very easily answered by her using the fake hammer specifically to try to get those reads
and not actually getting as many as she wanted from it
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:04 am
by xRECKONERx
so you decided fake hammering someone to put them at l-1 and potentially get them lynched before even bothering to form reads was.............................good?
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:04 am
by Ankamius
In post 726, Ankamius wrote:I don't think tris specifically gambits a fake hammer and then plays like she did
it's an awkward progression
awkward progression as scum*
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:04 am
by xRECKONERx
ah yes i too like to play fast and loose with lynches when i have no reads
quite
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:05 am
by Ankamius
it was actually pretty safe since iirc everybody is
a. already on the wagon
b. stated to not be interested in the wagon
c. a lurker
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:05 am
by Enter
In post 726, Ankamius wrote:I don't think tris specifically gambits a fake hammer and then plays like she did
it's an awkward progression
Unless she did it for towncred cuz she knows NMSA flips scum
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:06 am
by tris
How was that going to get them lynched? Are you saying someone would vote for NMSA after an apparent hammer?
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:06 am
by Enter
Ank is selling towncred and reck is buying it up.
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:06 am
by Ankamius
In post 732, Enter wrote: In post 726, Ankamius wrote:I don't think tris specifically gambits a fake hammer and then plays like she did
it's an awkward progression
Unless she did it for towncred cuz she knows NMSA flips scum
that makes no sense
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:07 am
by tris
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:08 am
by Ankamius
unless you think tris would leave an rvs vote for as long as she did without specifically doing anything related to that push?
there's like zero towncred to get from the NMSA lynch for her and the fake hammer is more of a towncred multiplier than a flat towncred boost
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:08 am
by xRECKONERx
i too like to throw the english language into a blender
what
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:10 am
by xRECKONERx
In post 731, Ankamius wrote:it was actually pretty safe since iirc everybody is
a. already on the wagon
b. stated to not be interested in the wagon
c. a lurker
i really dont get a vibe from any of tris's posting that she was aware of that
if she had read closely enough to know exactly where everyone else stood on the issue... if she read that much to know it was safe... then she wouldn't be having to double back to form reads after the fact, because she would already have them
In post 733, tris wrote:How was that going to get them lynched? Are you saying someone would vote for NMSA after an apparent hammer?
you apparently only bamboozled me with the hammer, so, yes
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:11 am
by Flubbernugget
As much as both of his main pushes skeeve me out reck looks better after his reads list than before. The fake anger thing I pointed out stemmed from the fact that I really didn't see anything that looked like provocation from me or Enter to actually irritate him in any reasonable way. It made his posting seem like he was more playing to a character than being genuinely crass. That was why I decided to unvote for him when the wagon was forming. I wanted as few irritants to reck at the time to see what he would and wouldn't get pissy about. That ended up being moot by the LAL push anyway.
As previously mentioned, I'm liking urap for scum. His pushes off the nmsa wagon were basically just a few new votes and wagon solicitations. And when nothing happened, they just tried the same thing with a new head. It's not really a productive way to try and form reads and doesn't come off as actually trying to solve the game.
Ank is looking pretty scummy too.
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:11 am
by Ankamius
In post 737, Ankamius wrote:unless you think tris would leave an rvs vote for as long as she did without specifically doing anything related to that push?
there's like zero towncred to get from the NMSA lynch for her and the fake hammer is more of a towncred multiplier than a flat towncred boost
actually to add to this
if the goal was to get as much towncred as possible
why wouldn't she be aggressive after the fake hammer
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:11 am
by Ankamius
In post 740, Flubbernugget wrote:As much as both of his main pushes skeeve me out reck looks better after his reads list than before. The fake anger thing I pointed out stemmed from the fact that I really didn't see anything that looked like provocation from me or Enter to actually irritate him in any reasonable way. It made his posting seem like he was more playing to a character than being genuinely crass. That was why I decided to unvote for him when the wagon was forming. I wanted as few irritants to reck at the time to see what he would and wouldn't get pissy about. That ended up being moot by the LAL push anyway.
As previously mentioned, I'm liking urap for scum. His pushes off the nmsa wagon were basically just a few new votes and wagon solicitations. And when nothing happened, they just tried the same thing with a new head. It's not really a productive way to try and form reads and doesn't come off as actually trying to solve the game.
Ank is looking pretty scummy too.
so your two scumreads
are me
and my top scumread
nice
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:12 am
by xRECKONERx
flubb still pinging it hard
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:13 am
by tris
In post 740, Flubbernugget wrote:As much as both of his main pushes skeeve me out reck looks better after his reads list than before. The fake anger thing I pointed out stemmed from the fact that I really didn't see anything that looked like provocation from me or Enter to actually irritate him in any reasonable way. It made his posting seem like he was more playing to a character than being genuinely crass. That was why I decided to unvote for him when the wagon was forming. I wanted as few irritants to reck at the time to see what he would and wouldn't get pissy about. That ended up being moot by the LAL push anyway.
As previously mentioned, I'm liking urap for scum. His pushes off the nmsa wagon were basically just a few new votes and wagon solicitations. And when nothing happened, they just tried the same thing with a new head. It's not really a productive way to try and form reads and doesn't come off as actually trying to solve the game.
Ank is looking pretty scummy too.
You think Ank and nmsa2 is SvS?
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:13 am
by Ankamius
In post 739, xRECKONERx wrote:i really dont get a vibe from any of tris's posting that she was aware of thatif she had read closely enough to know exactly where everyone else stood on the issue... if she read that much to know it was safe... then she wouldn't be having to double back to form reads after the fact, because she would already have them
but only about half the game was currently active at the time that she did the fake hammer
NMSA has been a big enough focus throughout the day that it's not too difficult to be able to pick up on who's for and against that wagon regardless of anything else
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:13 am
by Enter
In post 737, Ankamius wrote:unless you think tris would leave an rvs vote for as long as she did without specifically doing anything related to that push?
there's like zero towncred to get from the NMSA lynch for her and the fake hammer is more of a towncred multiplier than a flat towncred boost
Ank doesn't give town cred for gambitting fake hammers for reads on the lynchee. Got it.
Reck looks more like town, ank looks more like scum. That's what that means
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:14 am
by Flubbernugget
738 made me chuckle
Pedit: it's day1. I don't try to game solve d1 and even if I did nmsa is the kind of player scum busses
Pedit LET ME POST ASSHOLES
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:14 am
by xRECKONERx
i really feel like you're going out on a limb to call tris town for that, ank. i dont see it
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:14 am
by Ankamius
In post 746, Enter wrote: In post 737, Ankamius wrote:unless you think tris would leave an rvs vote for as long as she did without specifically doing anything related to that push?
there's like zero towncred to get from the NMSA lynch for her and the fake hammer is more of a towncred multiplier than a flat towncred boost
Ank doesn't give town cred for gambitting fake hammers for reads on the lynchee. Got it.
Reck looks more like town, ank looks more like scum. That's what that means
???????????????????????????