Mafiascum.net

In post 673, Menalque wrote:oh, just looking at my ISO to find where I declared intent: I'd forgotten that I was calling fark/emps as a possible pairing. So that means I've got to Farkran as possible scum in two pairings, through two more-or-less separate reads

In post 674, Menalque wrote:skitt said something that bothered me but can't remember exactly what now: I think about scum!her just pocketing me?

but I don't think scum!her would try and pocket me through buddying me, bc she knows that I know that pocketing is something she chooses to do as scum

I'm also not sure she'd do that to me vs NMSA or teacher bc I don't think scum!skitt would view me as a threat that much

but if she was to not try to pocket me (i.e. what she's done) she might actually be trying to pocket me by not doing what she thinks I would have expected scum!skitt to do

In post 675, Menalque wrote:like, I think there's a good chance scum!skitt just leaves me to push Farkran/someone else she knows is town so I'd take the flak after getting the lynch through

but when my activity took a hit then I became a reasonable first day iynch target bc I'm (1) easier to get through than teacher/NMSA probably (2) I'm less active than emps/sushi so prob also more viable than them (3) I probably become more dangerous late game to scum!skitt as a newbie and I think mislynching me becomes harder the longer game goes on bc I tend towards spewing myself town when I get active

In post 411, Farkran wrote:fakehammering is not a thing where i come from, it's considered a dirty play.

In post 725, skitter30 wrote:did you like not read anything between 399 and 513?

In post 677, Sushi Martyr wrote:The fact that Selynee's sticking around in the thread despite the high tension and has started posting more makes me feel better about her than I did before, especially because her posts seem reasonable.

The way skitter keeps defending Fark largely on the basis of him coming from a different site and being used to a different style of play, etc., gives me bad vibes.

In post 732, emps wrote:also mena didnt post in the middle of it

i feel like hes kinda lazy tbh

In post 679, Menalque wrote:100% nothing she's done here is a good reason to put her as solid town

In post 680, Menalque wrote:I think I would be townleaning me based on my play so far

In post 684, Farkran wrote:Her leaving out teacher in her latest update (#645), and him almost immediately correcting her might just have been the greatest scumtell ever that i had been overlooking until now.

In post 691, Menalque wrote:

In post 612, skitter30 wrote:

In post 534, Menalque wrote:I find it weird that you’re as keen for this wagon as you are skitt

because i think you've been trying to get in a lynch on lynch-bait-y town

and yeah the fact that the game stalled when you got wagoned is ... slightly concerning

btw the townread i had on selynee has all in all evaporated

surely the definition of Lynch-baity town is that they do things that seem justifiable for lynching

why is this scummy rather than me just disagreeing with you about whether the tells are genuinely scummy vs town being scummy?

I've been more reticent on fark than I think I might have been and I think you know why

In post 711, EpicCreeper9002 wrote:I think a lot of people are overlooking Selynee and Sushi Martyr. I see good questions from them both, feels like town but could easily be made up.

In post 729, emps wrote:

In post 411, Farkran wrote:fakehammering is not a thing where i come from, it's considered a dirty play.

wait fakehammering is dirty play but faking that ur a newb and this is ur first game isnt????

imo the whole "rando names lol no meta allowed" is bad imo