Mafiascum.net

In post 724, teacher wrote:But Im generally of Mena's view. Skit's not going to be a D1 option absent some true weirdness for me. And Im def not there yet. But I appreciate you going back.

In post 717, teacher wrote:Skit, explain the nibs read? Fumuki-san has always troubled me, so Id like some walk through.

In post 730, the worst wrote:how so?

In post 731, skitter30 wrote:I realized i'm running a fever so i'm just going to go to sleep now :/

In post 546, skitter30 wrote:

Spoiler:

In post 27, Nibbui wrote:

In post 25, Bingle wrote:Glancing at ISOs I'm a little surprised you call yourself a spamposter. What makes you think you qualify for the title.

I'm usually the top poster if people like tw or RC aren't in the game

and even when they are, if we're gonna count words instead of posts I'm pretty confident I can win often

my posts are longer than theirs usually, but more or less at the same frequency

I got more laidback nowadays though...

...

I think.

townie for him

In post 56, Nibbui wrote:This game is so laidback rn that it's like...

precious.

i'm gonna take a screenshot and post "do you feel old yet?" when we start post-game rants about who is to blame for the mislynches.

townie for him

In post 70, Nibbui wrote:ok my early read on ceejay plan failed

VOTE: duck

what are you serious about? let me get through your bird head

i like the vote at this time

In post 74, Nibbui wrote:UNVOTE:

I feel like I'm the only one tryharding and it's just sad

townie for him

In post 108, Nibbui wrote:Just logged in morning to check real quick

In post 91, Wickedestjr wrote:

In post 49, Nibbui wrote:

In post 45, Wickedestjr wrote:Hey everyone!

irrelephant, TTTT, urap and friends disliked this post

How did Nibbui feel about it?

NAI

In post 105, NorwegianboyEE wrote:A couple of initial reactions:

Nibbui: Damn boi, you talk a lot of garbage.

By garbage you mean my early reads/reaching is bs in your pov or i just post too much noise?

In post 106, the worst wrote:don't count on it Nor, Mr. Bbui is tragically scum aligned.

VOTE: the worst

You had asked me how i feel about your wagon now that I think about it and the answer is Bingle might or not have a reason and the rest are sheeping bc of, idk, wagons?

This is actually a more serious vote though

In most normal-lenght games I think you begin by SR'ing me along with some people and gradually it changes to a TR, but here I think you're just trying to emulate that behavior bc you think I would get sus if you started town leaning me too easy

If this is a joke you're just again being kind of dismissive to me trying to reach/engage you and in a more "bad-faith" way than before

I'm not even as cheeky as I used to in my op posts so I don't think you have any real reason to what you're doing rn. it just feels forced/fake.

In post 134, Nibbui wrote:

In post 129, Menalque wrote:No, actually you’ve explained why you think ducky is scum, mostly based on meta with you

I want you to explain why he’s being anti-town in what he’s doing

Hmm, I don't think I can explain why duck is more likely scum than town to me rn without using meta

from a objective pov you can say something like "he is not making a effort to engage or explain what he is thinking" but that's more about being ""protown"" than being actually town or scum.

what is irking me is essentially the fact that i don't see why duck wouldn't act otherwise here.

It's a pretty personal read you could say.

this explanation of his tw townread was ridiculously townie

In post 298, Nibbui wrote:i think skitter is giving town reads a bit too easy but i don't really remember much of how she usually is in that regard

In post 315, Nibbui wrote:jingle what's your read on me and tw

at least give me that to work with

i like that he's questioning you and tw here

In post 327, Nibbui wrote:don't out it yet skitter

too early for a real wagon

In post 338, Nibbui wrote:

anyway, I just felt like Wicked was only coming to thread to ask pointless questions to apparently random people he picks up, not really getting on what is being discussed, while also vaguely talking about the game state. I wanted to see how long he would do it without being called out for bc that would directly impact to my confidence on my read there.

It was like when I called skygazer or montosh too early for what they were doing wrong, and couldn't give a good enough case or get that much confident on what i had

this whole wicked thing was v similar to how i was reading him, but came through a different, but believeable and natural thought process.

this is one of the things that made me feel like he's approaching the thread the same way as me - he came to the same conclusion using a slightly different set of reference points, and thus approached it differently, but it was the same read

this is the one that made me feel like he's approaching the game similarly to me ^

and i think around here i declared him a strong townread iirc

@jingle

pedit good god just wait a few minutes

In post 703, skitter30 wrote:

In post 701, skitter30 wrote:i was talking about 108/134

also i don't know how to explain it better than 'feels townie for him'

In post 708, skitter30 wrote:a) not knowing how to articulate things at this moment doesn't negate the read
b) nibbui is a strong townread. the fact that he comes worse off in a spat about incompatible playstyles doesn't change the read
c) what is it telling of, pray tell?

In post 741, the worst wrote:his initial vote is >rand scum, i don't think his unvote/reeval/revote manoeuvre in itself is actually town indicative (it's either town tryna sort me or scum tryna work out if i'm lynchable) but his suggestion that i was emulating my usual read on him was pretty critical and interesting

also think he's advancing the gamestate in interesting ways

skitter towncase above feels TMI but there's some credit in there