If anyone had any doubt as to Pisskop being scum, check the VC here. He disbands partially one wagon to go sit on a vanity mastina wagon.
There's about 1 day left too.
The problem is getting an EP lynch is near impossible when the moving slots are almost all scum. Churros and Pisskop have no reason to vote EP knowing that I'll have to collapse onto RS.
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2020 7:48 pm
by EspressoPatronum
Time is running out + I'd rather not risk a no-lynch.
VOTE: RS
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2020 7:58 pm
by EspressoPatronum
@gobble any word about your role? We need an answer by EOD.
We can get a lot of value out of your role, but we need to know if it turns 1x into 2x or acts as a duplication for that night's action. In either case, you're essentially a free target for investigatives, docs, and other utility roles. We just need to make sure we're sending the right people to you (ie. That 1xs don't waste their ability on you).
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2020 8:47 pm
by mastina
In post 695, EspressoPatronum wrote:Wouldn't scum in RS's shoes claim loyal neighbourizer to later fake a guilty? His plain neighbourizer claim seems more town imo.
It's not the role claimed which frankly is (probably) nai (although in this game specifically I have minor reasons to suspect it as a scum role), it's the way it was done.
Role != alignment.
Confirmed role means its role is confirmed; it does not confirm the alignment of the role and doesn't even confirm that the roleclaim is entirely truthful. Persivul successfully neighborizing someone would confirm that his role has the ability to neighborize someone at least once; it does nothing to confirm that he is a oneshot neighborizer. (For instance, a mafia JOAT with strongman, ninja, neighborizer, could be his role, as an example. It could be something more niche, too.)
And even if it was confirmed that he's legit just a 1x neighborizer. Even if he was rolecopped as being a 1x neighborizer--again, confirmed role != confirmed alignment because there's nothing about 1x neighborizer which screams "this is a town role".
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2020 8:49 pm
by mastina
In post 724, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:Seems to me that when a case against you is based in whole or in part on meta, then meta is perfectly reasonable to use in defense.
Considering that I didn't even know you were Persivul and was scumreading you for your play this game before even knowing your past games or past identity, it sure is bold of you to declare that the case on you is reliant on meta and in no way shape or form something based around your play.
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2020 9:14 pm
by alimdia
In post 711, gobbledygook wrote:I’m a duplicater. After targeting me a persons action is doubled
I'm not motivated enough to effort a push on Egix, so I'll be down to hammer ~ ~
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2020 10:39 pm
by Rabid Schnauzer
In post 726, Titus wrote:If anyone had any doubt as to Pisskop being scum, check the VC here. He disbands partially one wagon to go sit on a vanity mastina wagon.
In post 724, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:Seems to me that when a case against you is based in whole or in part on meta, then meta is perfectly reasonable to use in defense.
Considering that I didn't even know you were Persivul and was scumreading you for your play this game before even knowing your past games or past identity, it sure is bold of you to declare that the case on you is reliant on meta and in no way shape or form something based around your play.
Why do you lie so much?
I purposely included "or in part" because yes, non-meta arguments were made as well.
If you're not scum, you're the kind of toxic town player who makes the game miserable for your targets.
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2020 11:22 pm
by alimdia
Btw I wanna say I hate meta cases, esp cos I cbf reading the games you guys linked.
Posted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 12:57 am
by Titus
VOTE: RS
I think EP is scum but can't risk an NL. Plus, I got real demotivated on defending this slot when its Persivul. Sucks but real.