Mafiascum.net

In post 719, nomnomnom wrote:

In post 718, Luca Blight wrote:You’re the one who seems to know how Quags will flip, Nom.

I think you're massively reaching considering that you're saying that me and quags are on S/S for the majority of today and now you're saying "yeah quag is town and she's whiteknighting him"
I feel you're confbiasing here

Well it’s not like both scenarios aren’t a possibility fmpov? I’ve never stated confidently that you’re s/s, both scenarios have always been in my mind.

If you want to see what real reaching is then refer back to your earlier push on me.

In post 723, nomnomnom wrote:you

so you think i'm bussing my partner in order to line up a lynch on you tomorrow?
because otherwise this argument doesn't make sense

In post 724, skitter30 wrote:again can you point to townie!posts

It's a tonal thing I already said what I thought earlier
I just don't want to vote there and have regrets I'm not 100% convinced on Quag being scum so I wouldn't feel good voting there
if I'm going to vote there I'd like to be more certain than I am right now

pedit: no I think you come across as manipulative and I am definitely getting massive bad vibes from you right now
I don't know what you're doing right now but it doesn't inspire me confidence

vote me then, because no offense that sounds like a load of bs

UNVOTE:
I'm being stupid it's not like you're getting lynched today
blergh, let me sort my thoughts for a bit

I’ve seen scum hard-defend town that are about to be lynched many times, Skitter. Nom would look better for the flip.

I think we should lynch Nom today.

In post 726, skitter30 wrote:

In post 723, nomnomnom wrote:you

so you think i'm bussing my partner in order to line up a lynch on you tomorrow?
because otherwise this argument doesn't make sense

I assumed she meant me, because if she meant you then it could be a perspective slip (from a Nom/Quags S/S perspective). I agree it makes no sense.

it's such a dumb stance for her to take as scum tho
this whole argument is dumb ...

like i don't know how anyone can look at what i've said and done and come out with the conclusion that i'm bussing my partner to set up a mislynch on her yesterday
like i don't even know what to do with that

i literally never said that I said I think you're being manipulative right now from a pure tonal perspective
my thoughts are just so scattered I need a good pause and a good reread I think

LETS JUST FLIP SOMETHING

(I prefer the inferior pokemon tbh)

It just looked like defensive shade/discrediting to me, and possibly a perspective slip as I mentioned above if her and Quags are s/s.

In post 728, skitter30 wrote:vote me then, because no offense that sounds like a load of bs

In post 733, skitter30 wrote:it's such a dumb stance for her to take as scum tho
this whole argument is dumb ...

like i don't know how anyone can look at what i've said and done and come out with the conclusion that i'm bussing my partner to set up a mislynch on her yesterday
like i don't even know what to do with that

very simple question skitter
Do you think there’s town motivation behind the action?

In post 716, nomnomnom wrote:Man I'm really getting an awful feeling about you right now
it almost feels like you know how Quag's going to flip and I am being lined up right next behind him
this is unsettling

you literally said it right here ^^^

that's the only way that post makes sense

and no i'm not being manipulative, i'm trying to understand what you mean with these bs arguments and if they can even come from town

In post 738, Captain the Furret wrote:

In post 728, skitter30 wrote:vote me then, because no offense that sounds like a load of bs

In post 733, skitter30 wrote:it's such a dumb stance for her to take as scum tho
this whole argument is dumb ...

like i don't know how anyone can look at what i've said and done and come out with the conclusion that i'm bussing my partner to set up a mislynch on her yesterday
like i don't even know what to do with that

very simple question skitter
Do you think there’s town motivation behind the action?

i'm trying to figure that out and i'm leaning towards no

In post 741, skitter30 wrote:

In post 738, Captain the Furret wrote:

In post 728, skitter30 wrote:vote me then, because no offense that sounds like a load of bs

In post 733, skitter30 wrote:it's such a dumb stance for her to take as scum tho
this whole argument is dumb ...

like i don't know how anyone can look at what i've said and done and come out with the conclusion that i'm bussing my partner to set up a mislynch on her yesterday
like i don't even know what to do with that

very simple question skitter
Do you think there’s town motivation behind the action?

i'm trying to figure that out and i'm leaning towards no

then its probably just scum

I was going to hold my vote until the end, but I think my mind is made up.

VOTE: Nom

VOTE: skit
depressing gamestate

the ultimate bad feels state when you're getting wagoned for refusing to put the popular wagon at L-1

That’s not a town vote.

A) Skitter has done nothing scummy whatsoever

B) it’s a vanity wagon

C) she’s hoping someone will come to her rescue with ‘scum wouldn’t make that vote’.

a desperate move

In post 747, nomnomnom wrote:the ultimate bad feels state when you're getting wagoned for refusing to put the popular wagon at L-1

‘I’m being Sr for the wrong reasons’