Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:44 am
Why don’t you go ahead and help get this wagon rolling nippyflips?
this still throws me off about hoopla and NS how are they confident enough on reads on each other to make a town block by page 3. literally hoops like 7th post. it just doesn't feel right to me.In post 64, Hoopla wrote:my current pick for most likely to be town is notscience. the following sequence of posts have an air of lucidity and stream-of-conscious curiosity;
Spoiler:
it appears to me, that this comes from a perspective of genuinely not knowing my alignment.
as such, let me appeal to you, notscience, directly. i want to offer you an invitation to work together to build some early town-powered wagons.
In post 727, notscience wrote:I elaborate on it later- I was curious to be on the other side of it. And I was still reading hoopla and bumped her down somewhere around page 10ish
Perhaps you can start by going one better than your predecessor, and explaining your vote on me?In post 732, bob3141 wrote:so can the main proponents of the leading wagons explain the case
And can the leading opponents explain the case against the wagons
oi, I was the first one to say Gypyx is scum, I want the credit.In post 731, gobbledygook wrote:If Agar was right and Gypyx is scum, I’m going to have egg all over my face
Don't worry, I'm at my best when the deck is stacked against meIn post 714, brassherald wrote:I apologize, my mouse is breaking so I must have pasted twice. Should be getting a new mouse today
Voting scum now doesn't completely clean your slate with me. This is little more than a vanity wagon now unfortunately, and you waited until -1 to do it? It's a bit limp.In post 723, notscience wrote:Want to cournerwagon Gypyx with me?
I’m pretty sure that’s a bad misinterpretation of how I approached it.In post 737, Battle Mage wrote:Voting scum now doesn't completely clean your slate with me. This is little more than a vanity wagon now unfortunately, and you waited until -1 to do it? It's a bit limp.In post 723, notscience wrote:Want to cournerwagon Gypyx with me?
In post 733, Battle Mage wrote:Perhaps you can start by going one better than your predecessor, and explaining your vote on me?In post 732, bob3141 wrote:so can the main proponents of the leading wagons explain the case
And can the leading opponents explain the case against the wagons
This is bad posting.In post 738, Battle Mage wrote:I'm assuming:
Emperor Flippynips
Unabombah
Gobbledygook
Hoopla
Klick
are all town.
easy game so far.
don't ask me, ask Notscience - he gave me that treatment when I replaced in too.In post 740, bob3141 wrote:In post 733, Battle Mage wrote:Perhaps you can start by going one better than your predecessor, and explaining your vote on me?In post 732, bob3141 wrote:so can the main proponents of the leading wagons explain the case
And can the leading opponents explain the case against the wagons
How can i explain someone elses vote Im not a mind reader.
UNVOTE:
Do i have to hold a card to my head.In post 743, Battle Mage wrote:don't ask me, ask Notscience - he gave me that treatment when I replaced in too.In post 740, bob3141 wrote:In post 733, Battle Mage wrote:Perhaps you can start by going one better than your predecessor, and explaining your vote on me?In post 732, bob3141 wrote:so can the main proponents of the leading wagons explain the case
And can the leading opponents explain the case against the wagons
How can i explain someone elses vote Im not a mind reader.
UNVOTE:
Bad posting? It's a readslist...wtf were you expecting!?In post 741, PranaDevil wrote:This is bad posting.In post 738, Battle Mage wrote:I'm assuming:
Emperor Flippynips
Unabombah
Gobbledygook
Hoopla
Klick
are all town.
easy game so far.
All three of my scum reads are on this list.
I can dig all of that (except C, but whatevs...)In post 739, notscience wrote:I’m pretty sure that’s a bad misinterpretation of how I approached it.In post 737, Battle Mage wrote:Voting scum now doesn't completely clean your slate with me. This is little more than a vanity wagon now unfortunately, and you waited until -1 to do it? It's a bit limp.In post 723, notscience wrote:Want to cournerwagon Gypyx with me?
I brought the wagon to l-2, he did his shady fos thing. I called him out on it and then he brought it to l-1.
I voted him because
A)id already been suspecting him most of the day check my iso
B) that vote was sketchy as fuck, his entire last few pages was
C)klick asked for more time.
excellent...I'm all in!In post 744, bob3141 wrote:Do i have to hold a card to my head.In post 743, Battle Mage wrote:don't ask me, ask Notscience - he gave me that treatment when I replaced in too.In post 740, bob3141 wrote:In post 733, Battle Mage wrote:Perhaps you can start by going one better than your predecessor, and explaining your vote on me?In post 732, bob3141 wrote:so can the main proponents of the leading wagons explain the case
And can the leading opponents explain the case against the wagons
How can i explain someone elses vote Im not a mind reader.
UNVOTE:
Your card is the jack of spades