No one is told whether they are roleblocked. Even a pr would say that their action failed but it wouldnt say whether they were roleblocked or the target were jkd
He also let me town read him because of this the entire game after that. What I want to do before we end is look at his other games to see if this interaction has played out. Directly after that he even said I'm cool with you town reading me that way.
Where I play it always say you are rbed so that is why I asked and now I'm even more curious as to why he let me think that the entire game
In post 266, votato wrote:No one is told whether they are roleblocked. Even a pr would say that their action failed but it wouldnt say whether they were roleblocked or the target were jkd
Yeah, so this is absolutely correct. You're just taking "even a pr would say their action failed" to be true even if the action was one that doesn't inherently receive a result.
That's not the case. If your power (such as jailkeeper) doesn't inherently receive a result, then you'd never know you were blocked. Were as if your action receives a result (such as tracker) you'd be told "no result" instead of something else, which is indication you'd been blocked.
seems like a big misunderstanding and votato never realize you misinterpreted his statement. he was fine with you taking him to be more likely to be town just on the information that if he was mafia there was a 50% chance you would have blocked him from carrying out the nightkill.
predit: yes that works. alternatively this lets you make a certain word link to a certain post: really useful to me as a moderator
In post 266, votato wrote:No one is told whether they are roleblocked. Even a pr would say that their action failed but it wouldnt say whether they were roleblocked or the target were jkd
Yeah, so this is absolutely correct. You're just taking "even a pr would say their action failed" to be true even if the action was one that doesn't inherently receive a result.
That's not the case. If your power (such as jailkeeper) doesn't inherently receive a result, then you'd never know you were blocked. Were as if your action receives a result (such as tracker) you'd be told "no result" instead of something else, which is indication you'd been blocked.
seems like a big misunderstanding and votato never realize you misinterpreted his statement. he was fine with you taking him to be more likely to be town just on the information that if he was mafia there was a 50% chance you would have blocked him from carrying out the nightkill.
predit: yes that works. alternatively this lets you make a certain word link to a certain post: really useful to me as a moderator
However he typed it , he knew I was townreading him because I believed I would have been told and he let me run with it all game
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2020 5:43 am
by Mikul
Anyway we won't get anything out of that and it's just clutter at this point.
Strictly off behavior I think tl is town I can't shake it and won't shake it. I have him as a near town confirmation off behavior and if I'm wrong , gg he wins.
I'm going to rb quick again
We'll deal with the outcome of this next dp which is likely me being alive still.
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2020 5:49 am
by Micc
In post 728, Mikul wrote:However he typed it , he knew I was townreading him because I believed I would have been told and he let me run with it all game
that's not how i read it.
and i think if any of the experienced SE's took it that way they'd have challenged that thinking. heck i'm challenging that thinking myself and i'm the guy who inherited the slot supposedly benefiting from it.
In post 697, Town looter wrote:Sorry, it should have been NoooOOOOoooooOOOooooo!!!! as it was lamenting Ydrasse being likely to flip town (at this point they would have little reason to lie). It was right about here my little confirmation bias bubble popped.
This would be a lot easier if you story didn't keep changing.
Please cite your sources for this one. I don’t see it.
This feels like big time shading of TL to me
not letting this one go, even if we’re moving onto the next day phase
In post 697, Town looter wrote:Sorry, it should have been NoooOOOOoooooOOOooooo!!!! as it was lamenting Ydrasse being likely to flip town (at this point they would have little reason to lie). It was right about here my little confirmation bias bubble popped.
This would be a lot easier if you story didn't keep changing.
Please cite your sources for this one. I don’t see it.
This feels like big time shading of TL to me
not letting this one go, even if we’re moving onto the next day phase
Oh? You don't see a conflicting narrative from Tl at ALL? I think it's about as clear as mud what Tl's original intention was given what he's said. You disagree? Why?
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2020 6:34 am
by Nash
VOTE: ArthurConyl
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2020 6:48 am
by Micc
In post 739, LicketyQuickety wrote:Oh? You don't see a conflicting narrative from Tl at ALL? I think it's about as clear as mud what Tl's original intention was given what he's said. You disagree? Why?
I took TL’s post to be lamenting the likely town flip. “Clear as mud” means not clear at all, yeah? I disagree then.
I’m just looking for you to cite sources on where TL has kept changing his story. Because as far as I’m concerned you asked TL to provide context on a post and he gave it to you.
Just because you have a theory that TL is lying about the intentions of a post doesn’t mean he has changed his story. I think it’s really misrepresentative for you to push that as a case.
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2020 6:51 am
by LicketyQuickety
In post 741, Micc wrote:I think it’s really misrepresentative for you to push that as a case.
It felt like he was excited. Then he said he wasn't. That's about all it is. I still feel he showed he was generally happy to be let off the hook and the fact he kinda covers this up is quite suspect.
