In post 725, Galron wrote:
I don't get the Looker read with so little content. Actually, without some explanations, this entire list looks fishy. Someone made a point of saying how can you have reads on 20 players. I subscribe to that. I'll ask what's your process here?
pedit: Ninja'd
1. I copy-pasted the list from page 1
2. I went through each player and divided them into TOWN NULL SCUM WHO? lists
3. I read the iso of everyone in WHO and tried to put them into TOWN or SCUM.
4. I read the iso of everyone in NULL and tried to put them in TOWN or SCUM.
5. I re-ordered all players within each category from town to scum. So, after this, the entire list is ordinal.
6. I posted the result.
Looker was NULL and then placed into SCUM in step 4. I placed him there because he posts and does not scumhunt. IIRC he's close to the null side of the SCUM section. He does have a post where he says something like "people are bored I think" (one of his last ones) which felt vaguely town, which accounts for the weaker read (not to mention that there's not much content, as you say).
I think most of the rationale for my reads should be pretty clear from reading my catch-up posts (with exceptions for a few players like Looker).