Mafiascum.net

In post 723, MathBlade wrote:

In post 80, samantha97 wrote:

In post 78, TemporalLich wrote:I have 4 votes on me right?

nope it's 5 right now

also I sent page 63 https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... 8&start=63

Here

You do know page 63 is actually here right?: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... start=1550

In post 725, TemporalLich wrote:

In post 723, MathBlade wrote:

In post 80, samantha97 wrote:

In post 78, TemporalLich wrote:I have 4 votes on me right?

nope it's 5 right now

also I sent page 63 https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... 8&start=63

Here

You do know page 63 is actually here right?: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... start=1550

Yes I do. I am on mobile.

The bigger question:

Why does Sam link page 3 instead of 63?

In post 674, MathBlade wrote:You’d be wrong DT. I don’t know what page numbers my predecessor submitted but my role is on page 70. It conflicts with the good majority of 63.

Sam is almost assuredly scum.

I just can’t explain without hardclaiming.

I have crumbed a lot of it since the start.

Look back at the convos I have had.

I need to be here tonight to confirm ABR. Please.

you know what fine I'll unvote for now. I probably shouldn't have ignored this but oh well.

UNVOTE:

pedit: I'm gonna assume since "63" is in the URL it's an honest mistake

I don't even know why I'm pushing sam town so hard besides to spite ABR's lack of case but an ISO skim only reveals sam's ISO to be "promising" instead of towny like I initially thought

oh right... I've been pressured so I'm trying to look town

In post 728, TemporalLich wrote:

In post 674, MathBlade wrote:You’d be wrong DT. I don’t know what page numbers my predecessor submitted but my role is on page 70. It conflicts with the good majority of 63.

Sam is almost assuredly scum.

I just can’t explain without hardclaiming.

I have crumbed a lot of it since the start.

Look back at the convos I have had.

I need to be here tonight to confirm ABR. Please.

you know what fine I'll unvote for now. I probably shouldn't have ignored this but oh well.

UNVOTE:

pedit: I'm gonna assume since "63" is in the URL it's an honest mistake

Why? She’s had all this time to correct it and has posted all sorts of mechanics but not reads.

This doesn’t read as honest mistake.

The URL linked starts at post #63, which isn't a page.

And no one called Sam on it before so it's still possibly an honest mistake.

And yeah Sam's ISO is just mechanics instead of reads... that's why it is "promising"

In post 732, TemporalLich wrote:The URL linked starts at post #63, which isn't a page.

And no one called Sam on it before so it's still possibly an honest mistake.

And yeah Sam's ISO is just mechanics instead of reads... that's why it is "promising"

Iioa is a scumtell.

I gotta work now but Sam “no reads all mechanics” needs to be the elim today. She did a blatant omgus and it’s very unlikely she has reads at all.

ah... I said "promising" as in iioa is a towntell... if iioa is a scumtell Sam's ISO is terrible and I'd actually be better off voting Sam as that would vindicate both you and ABR for having actual good cases

that's the saddest reach I've seen in a mafia game in 10 years lol

I manually edited the url to 63 thinking that this forum had pages set up that way, and I did notice it not long after I posted it but figured people could read and just go to page 63 regardless. I also planned on compiling a similar list of roles to jake's when we had a full page list, but we still don't have that information.

I also already did say I had reads. I said I think abf, temporal, and plusjoyed are all being honest about their alignment and that doubtingthomas is likely mafia because they lied (and you). I also stressed the absence of reads on inactive slots, like your predecessor, due to it being impossible to read posts that don't exist.

misrepresenting stuff doesn't make you look any better

In post 466, samantha97 wrote:I believe albert/temporal/plusjoyed about their alignment. The only person who has done anything that has given me direct reason to think they're mafia (inactivity excluded) is doubting so far

how I managed to miss this on a skim idk

I'm not reading sam's iso as scummy, I have no idea what you guys are on about. Unless ABR is bus'ing?

In post 732, TemporalLich wrote:And yeah Sam's ISO is just mechanics instead of reads... that's why it is "promising"

It's early in the game, though? So what if it's just mechanics at this point.

In post 737, DrippingGoofball wrote:I'm not reading sam's iso as scummy, I have no idea what you guys are on about. Unless ABR is bus'ing?

If ABR is bussing (I doubt it), that would be clear tomorrow no?

Find a single genuine read in the ISO. I’ll wait. She doesn’t have them. She’s sleeping others.

I found 466 as the only read so far, that's something but that likely is just sheeping

In post 729, TemporalLich wrote:I don't even know why I'm pushing sam town so hard besides to spite ABR's lack of case but an ISO skim only reveals sam's ISO to be "promising" instead of towny like I initially thought

*nods*

In post 737, DrippingGoofball wrote:I'm not reading sam's iso as scummy, I have no idea what you guys are on about. Unless ABR is bus'ing?

Okay. You don't like any pushes today. You are welcome to push someone yourself.

In post 712, DrippingGoofball wrote:Deepwolfing and openwolfing are such stupid words, I can't wait for someone to come up with something better.

Agree 100%

DGB not voting anyone by now is suspicious.

I'll vote literally anyone ngl I'm having trouble staying engaged when the stakes are so low
I do think sam is town though.

if doubtingThomas shoots me they are lying about being a vig and just buying time so me being in their potential shots is pretty sus

Then if you’re willing to vote anyone why don’t you vote Sam?

That’s pretty sus.

will come back when I properly read,, trust maths or not trust maths, it’s the big question