Mafiascum.net

In post 723, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 721, Guillotina wrote:Except Cat cause it got confused. Insert BlackMage there

what the fuck is with this 'black mage' crap? can we keep my ethnicity out of it, thanks

oh yes, you were the one who tried to get my predecessor modkilled

In post 723, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 721, Guillotina wrote:Except Cat cause it got confused. Insert BlackMage there

what the fuck is with this 'black mage' crap? can we keep my ethnicity out of it, thanks

My bad. Sorry

In post 725, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 723, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 721, Guillotina wrote:Except Cat cause it got confused. Insert BlackMage there

what the fuck is with this 'black mage' crap? can we keep my ethnicity out of it, thanks

oh yes, you were the one who tried to get my predecessor modkilled

Im not discussing that no longer and neither should you.

In post 724, Gamma Emerald wrote:So your townread on me was never genuine. The entire townread on you that I had was based on you actually genuinely reconsidering me, so to find that reconsideration was staged outside you even deeper in the red than when you were initially pinging me.

It was not genuine at all. I pocketed a wolf and you fell for it.

it's alright, seems there always one clever clogs in every game nowadays who thinks that shit is funny.

In post 729, Battle Mage wrote:it's alright, seems there always one clever clogs in every game nowadays who thinks that shit is funny.

Oh no, i legit read black mage instead of battle mage. I meant no malice.

@superb I still townread DT but I am willing to lim guillo now

In post 706, Battle Mage wrote:<3 I'm excited to see you too, and also at peace with the fact you being here means I don't need to worry about anything after this dayphase.

you need to thank the heavens that I didn't roll vig then, LMAO

-nornor

In post 710, catboi wrote:fairly neutral

I noticed this as well. I have played one game with Johnny(that is finished) and I, for the time being, am not sure what his town tells are.

-norbear

In post 710, catboi wrote:fairly neutral

I noticed this as well. I have played one game with Johnny(that is finished) and I, for the time being, am not sure what his town tells are.

-norbear

Pretty shitty pocket if the minute you rip out the Hoover Flag the person falls out

In post 711, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 633, Chaos Triforce wrote:Town!Taylor doesn't give two shits what anyone thinks about anything/anyone. Hmmmmmm.

thats true but i do caere about the game being fun due to limited toxicity. the game is currently not meeting that threshold.

the context is weird but I wasn't even talking about that specifically. I was saying your play this game has been rather reserved and I dont feel that townie spirit.

In post 719, Gamma Emerald wrote:Not impressed by what seems to be Johnny stirring the pot

very opportunistic imo. no one's really SRed Johnny all game. The moment sexy prfpc brings it up, gamma immediately shades Johnny.

Again. lemme repeat. THIS. IS. SCUM.

-takingadeepbreathnornor

In post 720, Guillotina wrote:The first one was a fake read list.

HUH @_@
what?

-questionmarknornor

In post 725, Battle Mage wrote:oh yes, you were the one who tried to get my predecessor modkilled

O_O shits gonna go down now eh?
*grabs some popcorn*

-popcornnornor

In post 724, Gamma Emerald wrote:So your townread on me was never genuine. The entire townread on you that I had was based on you actually genuinely reconsidering me, so to find that reconsideration was staged outside you even deeper in the red than when you were initially pinging me.

So you townread me because i said i town read you, so all the towns that dont townread you will get eliminated? That's not how this works.

Read up status: F I N I S H E D

-happybearbear

pedit:frick u

The whole 'case' against Gamma from Guillotina is hot-air nonsense that mostly assumes gamma being scum as a prior then assembles "evidence" working off the idea of him being scum in the first place when he's been fairly studiously scumhunting for most of the day. Does guillo-scum bother with such an elaborate setup, though? I have doubts.

In post 737, Chaos Triforce wrote:

In post 720, Guillotina wrote:The first one was a fake read list.

HUH @_@
what?

-questionmarknornor

Huh what what?

Why do you need a "fake reads list"?

-detectivenornor

In post 739, Guillotina wrote:

In post 724, Gamma Emerald wrote:So your townread on me was never genuine. The entire townread on you that I had was based on you actually genuinely reconsidering me, so to find that reconsideration was staged outside you even deeper in the red than when you were initially pinging me.

So you townread me because i said i town read you, so all the towns that dont townread you will get eliminated? That's not how this works.

The reason you townread me actually sounded like a real reason, so I thought you were being genuine. Now that I know it’s bait, it comes off as an excessively marinated wad of crap, which I think is scummy. If you just wanted to bait scum you probably just give a vaguely passable reason, but you tried to make me believe it. That’s sus.

In post 741, catboi wrote:The whole 'case' against Gamma from Guillotina is hot-air nonsense that mostly assumes gamma being scum as a prior then assembles "evidence" working off the idea of him being scum in the first place when he's been fairly studiously scumhunting for most of the day. Does guillo-scum bother with such an elaborate setup, though? I have doubts.

Based on the presumed intent, I think complex behavior is more scum indicating than something basic. His aim was to corner me in order to make me be unable to push him effectively. That’s not okay on ANY level.

In post 743, Chaos Triforce wrote:Why do you need a "fake reads list"?

-detectivenornor

It's how i study the room to confirm or discard hunches, how players interact with me when i scum read them or how they react when I town read them. How other players interact with the players in my lists, how their behavior change basec on my interaction with them, how it indirectly affect others.

In post 700, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 697, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Oh hi bm

hi Johnny

are you scum?

if not, who is scum?

did i claim yet?

if so, what?

Hey, naw, prolly Taylor she's like present and actively keeping up, and no lol not this time

In post 747, JohnnyFarrar wrote:prolly Taylor she's like present and actively keeping up

lolwut

In post 744, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 739, Guillotina wrote:

In post 724, Gamma Emerald wrote:So your townread on me was never genuine. The entire townread on you that I had was based on you actually genuinely reconsidering me, so to find that reconsideration was staged outside you even deeper in the red than when you were initially pinging me.

So you townread me because i said i town read you, so all the towns that dont townread you will get eliminated? That's not how this works.

The reason you townread me actually sounded like a real reason, so I thought you were being genuine. Now that I know it’s bait, it comes off as an excessively marinated wad of crap, which I think is scummy. If you just wanted to bait scum you probably just give a vaguely passable reason, but you tried to make me believe it. That’s sus.

Oh you got that one right, it is scummy, sneaky even, but im town. I'm a bad scummy town.
The kind wolves or cannibals in this case want to get policy lynched.

But i won't get eliminated, if you want me dead, your faction will have to kill me during the night.