Mafiascum.net

What are your reads right now redtea?

I had a dream RC replaced into this game and yelled at nsg and I for having terrible reads

Ok who is RC?

In post 727, flow trap wrote:Ok who is RC?

I think RadiantCowbells.

In post 726, Dannflor wrote:I had a dream RC replaced into this game and yelled at nsg and I for having terrible reads

Ive only had the pleasure of being in a game he modded before he quit. Hope he is alright, heard he was like me playstyle wise but actually good consistently

In post 720, Esooa wrote:bruh you want to say why Farren is your partner? I don't think I ever even said that so tf?

you know what i think i saw myself in your scum reads next to farren and my tired mind jumped to conclusions.
if there was no thoughts we were partners there, disregard it. You can talk about your read on me from when you posted that reads list if you want, but i assume it's not too relevant now

why can't i be fierce and not stupid at the same time

In post 723, flow trap wrote:

In post 714, redtea wrote:"so you weren't ready to commit" i was literally mia im so dumb
sorry flow trap ignore that

I didn't read that as an accusation in the first place

is this why people don't respond to me??

ich troje #724
tell me why you're pushing yourself tomorrow

In post 725, Ich Troje wrote:What are your reads right now redtea?

farren
ich


esooa
dannflooooor
nsg
t3


enchant


flow trap

initially i wasn't going to have anybody in the "mafia" tier, but I have t3 and flow trap on the same spectrum in my head and after measuring the difference between the two, decided that out of everyone here, I can definitely see flow trap as "sit-back-and-watch" scum. t3 has not earned a town read from me, but where t3 seems like they just have their own brand of townplay, flow trap's play feels more like they're sitting on a couch throwing peanuts at us.

don't take this reads list too seriously, they're weak, as always i do try to keep things liquid-y in my head d1 (moreso than most), because d2 usually brings critical info for shaping my reads, as my playstyle biases are too strong for me to go much of anywhere without that additional information.

i would heaven farren in an instant, for the record, if not for the fact i think he might be a critical player for town atm

that's my one strong read

In post 733, redtea wrote:i would heaven farren in an instant, for the record, if not for the fact i think he might be a critical player for town atm

lol

In post 731, redtea wrote:ich troje #724
tell me why you're pushing yourself tomorrow

I think you can answer that one for yourself.

In post 704, ManateeDude wrote:

Hell VC1.12

We all know this one.

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to send someone to Hell

Enchant (3):

flow trap, T3, Dannflor

Farren (2):

redtea

, Ich Troje

T3 (2):

Enchant, Esooa

Esooa (1):

northsidegal

Dannflor (1):

Farren

Not Voting:

Deadline:

(expired on 2021-07-29 13:00:00)

Mod Notes:

redtea, please, if you would, describe why you flipped your read. I think it can happen, as I did so myself, but your thought process is missing from the equation as well as the vote change.

farren came off as "sloppy" town in our mutual game where he flipped scum and I townread him for the exact same thing.

another player had the piece though and carried us after our death after we buried the first scum.

i just realized this game's theme is 80s music and my account is a theme account for a 90s/2000s band lol

so who we helling

feel like nsg has dropped off a lot

where's Dann too, idr if he even explained the reads I asked him about

to be clear I don't wolf read them I just wanna hear more from them and who they're wanting to yeet atm

In post 732, redtea wrote:flow trap's play feels more like they're sitting on a couch throwing peanuts at us

This can mean a few things can you elaborate

UNVOTE: Dannflor

Not really satisfied here, but it's effectively a vanity wagon at this point.

T3: what happened between 547 and 606, with regards to Enchant?

In post 744, Farren wrote:UNVOTE: Dannflor

Not really satisfied here, but it's effectively a vanity wagon at this point.

T3: what happened between 547 and 606, with regards to Enchant?

Enchant was only talking about me.

What I mean is: you made a confident statement about how to meta-read Enchant first, then said you "weren't totally sure" how to meta them.

Was it Enchant focusing on you that caused that change, or something else? If something else, what?

.

.

.