Mafiascum.net

boop

In post 724, Harvey and Haley wrote:

In post 718, PenguinPower wrote:weren't you just voting gamma with house?

Lost interest in that for now, House is null to me, and there's momentum here.

-Harvey

FoS Partner

Would you vote Gamma if I re-voted there, Titus?

-Harvey

In post 719, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 668, Enchant wrote:I disagree, why town can't try to get best PR (VIGILANTE)?

You mean, the best PR to take away from scum? One-shot vig is surely not better than cop or doctor, but it is much better for scum.

What sense taking Cop/Doc, if you will be nightkilled fast, because mafia know who is PR.

1-Shot vigilante is better, because you still can shot someone in short time.
You also could considering taking PGO, but... Well. Different tastes?

loving the lack of follow up from Harvey

In post 729, Flea The Magician wrote:loving the lack of follow up from Harvey

I love writing walls to cases, but I think it's pointless and inefficient responding to yours.
If there are specific parts of it you would like my response to, I'd be glad to.

-Harvey

In post 727, Harvey and Haley wrote:Would you vote Gamma if I re-voted there, Titus?

-Harvey

No.

In post 728, Enchant wrote:

In post 719, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 668, Enchant wrote:I disagree, why town can't try to get best PR (VIGILANTE)?

You mean, the best PR to take away from scum? One-shot vig is surely not better than cop or doctor, but it is much better for scum.

What sense taking Cop/Doc, if you will be nightkilled fast, because mafia know who is PR.

1-Shot vigilante is better, because you still can shot someone in short time.
You also could considering taking PGO, but... Well. Different tastes?

This conversation is not helpful, as discussing the ideal strategy suggests what you'd do as a player. This helps mafia with nightkilling and is a great way to rolefish. *side eye Enchant*

In post 730, Harvey and Haley wrote:

In post 729, Flea The Magician wrote:loving the lack of follow up from Harvey

I love writing walls to cases, but I think it's pointless and inefficient responding to yours.
If there are specific parts of it you would like my response to, I'd be glad to.

-Harvey

Which is an amazing summary of your ISO

In post 732, Titus wrote:
This conversation is not helpful

Didn't read what next, i didn't ask your mind, ty.

In post 734, Enchant wrote:

In post 732, Titus wrote:
This conversation is not helpful

Didn't read what next, i didn't ask your mind, ty.

I didn't ask you to obvscum either as it ruins the mystery.

In post 735, Titus wrote:

In post 734, Enchant wrote:

In post 732, Titus wrote:
This conversation is not helpful

Didn't read what next, i didn't ask your mind, ty.

I didn't ask you to obvscum either as it ruins the mystery.

Can't hear you-u-u.

Stop the theatre and sheep me, folks.

-Harvey

In post 737, Harvey and Haley wrote:Stop the theatre and sheep me, folks.

-Harvey

What’s the theatre?

In post 737, Harvey and Haley wrote:Stop the theatre and sheep me, folks.

-Harvey

Prove you're town, then I will. Until then, I'm voting you and only you <3

I think Thor missed the only part of statistical analysis which is actually relevant to this game and I'm wondering if that's negligent enough that it's agenda indicative.

In post 740, the worst wrote:I think Thor missed the only part of statistical analysis which is actually relevant to this game and I'm wondering if that's negligent enough that it's agenda indicative.

I don’t feel like it is but I’m not closed to that concept

This is me popping in and contributing nothing of value.

Id assert that 6+/14 of the plist did not try to win the draft which means scum are statistically more likely (maybe more likely than ever?) to be amongst the memers.

Consider that we know for a fact scum didn't choose 1, or 2, or 4. Omit SS and myself (who always pick our numbers) at a minimum - idk about anyone else. SS and I can still be scum, obviously, but that probably leaves 6/14 of the plist who chose their numbers specifically to perform well in the draft.

I'd be pretty shocked if scum weren't involved in some number fudging this game.

In post 228, Thor Ragnarok wrote:But what I do have are the draft numbers selected by 45 scum across 15 games:

1 - xxxxxxxxx
2 - xxx
3 - xxx
4 - xxxx
5 - xxxx
6 - xxxx
7 - x
8 - xxxx
9 - x
10 - xx
11 - xx
12 - x
13 - x
15 - x
20 - x
22 - x
42 - xx
413 - x

As well as Titus, it probably makes Harvey and Haley town as well, scum really don't seem to like going for high or meme numbers; 69 would be the second highest on this list

I'm not sure if it's malicious either but this struck me like a bolt of lightning when I saw how the bid shook out. :/ I'm kinda surprised the talk about the draft has been so...normal.

correct me if I'm wrong obviously, I don't think 13 15 etc. are earnest attempts to perform well in the draft given frequency of lower numbers picked historically. I think 10 is intentionally chosen to outperform as many duplicates as possible safely, so that feels earnest.

In post 743, the worst wrote:Consider that we know for a fact scum didn't choose 1, or 2, or 4.

Wait, how did that come to pass?

I forgot people chose 4, typo. The analysis is fine in the abstract, I'm just blonde irl.

In post 742, House wrote:This is me popping in and contributing nothing of value.

mood

In post 747, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 742, House wrote:This is me popping in and contributing nothing of value.

mood

Nope.

wdym