Mafiascum.net

Heyo!

Mystic, your background being animated would have just been too busy, IMHO.

Idk why I'm bringing this back up. Maybe it's because the back to back avatars are distracting.

^ House

In post 620, Sakura Hana wrote:Why is a 4 vote wagon

"Opportunistic as fuck"

?

Don't have to really attack anyone if you vote the slot on vla.

In post 634, Sakura Hana wrote:

In post 632, RealCheeks wrote:This post never comes from town Titus.

Uhh.
I actually dont think that specific post is alignment specific for Titus.

Although I do think that thinking that you can analyze raids like resistance is wishful thinking tho

Why?

If a raid fails, we know there must be at least one scum on it.

If mission fails in resistance, we know there must be at least one scum on it.

In post 637, RealCheeks wrote:

In post 634, Sakura Hana wrote:

In post 632, RealCheeks wrote:This post never comes from town Titus.

Uhh.
I actually dont think that specific post is alignment specific for Titus.

Although I do think that thinking that you can analyze raids like resistance is wishful thinking tho

Let me breakdown what I see in that scumclaim of a post.

First Titus does not give weak, question looking reasons like "its like resistance?" Second they do the whole~ oh I've done something awkward, look over there at my mech theorising. As queen of mislim bait everywhere, I know a scum vote onto me when I see it.
~C

That's a terrible misrep on the tone.

The question was rhetorical. Also, I don't know who you are but trying to present yourself as a weak little innocent player to avoid scumhunting looks like your strategy here.

In post 645, Sakura Hana wrote:

In post 644, Romance wrote:Well, what's scummy specifically about Titus? I don't see it compared to Cakez.

If it's a wagon to kill shrug, I guess. Was assuming it was a "do something" wagon.

Well i dont have any specific reason to scumread titus at the moment.
I'm sheeping a townread and helping create a wagon to see if something interesting happens.

This is fairish. Dumb as a wagon on a player that's not present rarely actually accomplishes the goal, but it's still viable to see actions.

In post 671, Elsa Jay wrote:I'm back.

VOTE: Titus cuz first wagon blues.

I also didn't think the minus 2 days on deadline thing for the raid would do much but I forgot how slow some games go so two days off would suck. Doesn't help with 5 V/LA people here either.

Ok this vote is seeking to hop onto the biggest wagon and just make excuses.

In post 728, Titus wrote:Why?

If a raid fails, we know there must be at least one scum on it.

If mission fails in resistance, we know there must be at least one scum on it.

Missions in resistance also have way less people, and it's easier to figure out, in a pool of 8 it'd be almost like trying to find a needle in a haysack specially if we dont know the ammount of scum in it.
If you think you can do it, more power to you, i wasnt that good at cross referencing in mindnight/resistance anyway and that one felt easier.



I just feels these differences make it harder to figure things out with it.

In post 708, mastina wrote:RealCheeks (RCEnigma + CheekyTeeky)
Elsa Jay
Save The Dragons


SirCakez

Qrow and Raven (Gamma Emerald + Nancy Drew 39)

Ok with this PoE but I'd invert the order.

In post 732, Sakura Hana wrote:

In post 728, Titus wrote:Why?

If a raid fails, we know there must be at least one scum on it.

If mission fails in resistance, we know there must be at least one scum on it.

Missions in resistance also have way less people, and it's easier to figure out, in a pool of 8 it'd be almost like trying to find a needle in a haysack specially if we dont know the ammount of scum in it.
If you think you can do it, more power to you, i wasnt that good at cross referencing in mindnight/resistance anyway and that one felt easier.

There is also more incentive for scum to fail a mission in resistance, it's their main objective after all.

I just feels these differences make it harder to figure things out with it.

We wouldn't use the raids solely to find scum. It's just a tool in our toolbelt.

It would be impossible to crack the game by that method alone.

We shouldn't leave information or power on the table because it won't break the game itself.

In post 732, Sakura Hana wrote:

In post 728, Titus wrote:Why?

If a raid fails, we know there must be at least one scum on it.

If mission fails in resistance, we know there must be at least one scum on it.

Missions in resistance also have way less people, and it's easier to figure out, in a pool of 8 it'd be almost like trying to find a needle in a haysack specially if we dont know the ammount of scum in it.
If you think you can do it, more power to you, i wasnt that good at cross referencing in mindnight/resistance anyway and that one felt easier.

There is also more incentive for scum to fail a mission in resistance, it's their main objective after all.

I just feels these differences make it harder to figure things out with it.

Whats easier? 1-in-8 or 1-in-20?

In post 735, Mystic Bears wrote:

In post 732, Sakura Hana wrote:

In post 728, Titus wrote:Why?

If a raid fails, we know there must be at least one scum on it.

If mission fails in resistance, we know there must be at least one scum on it.

Missions in resistance also have way less people, and it's easier to figure out, in a pool of 8 it'd be almost like trying to find a needle in a haysack specially if we dont know the ammount of scum in it.
If you think you can do it, more power to you, i wasnt that good at cross referencing in mindnight/resistance anyway and that one felt easier.

There is also more incentive for scum to fail a mission in resistance, it's their main objective after all.

I just feels these differences make it harder to figure things out with it.

Whats easier? 1-in-8 or 1-in-20?

Actually, going to correct this slightly,

How many scum are usually in a game this size? 7?
That's still 7:21/1:3. Drop that down to a pool of 8 and it's still much much easier to look at a pool of 8 over a pool of 20

WHY DO YOU PEOPLE MAKE ME DO MATH!? DAMNIT I prefer mech not numbers -.-;

-Both above and this, Flea

In post 715, Tomorrow Corporation wrote:tictac is mechanically town; just trust me on this one. I'll elaborate on day 4 so hold me to this.

Almost locktown tbh

^T3

One of the gratifications of Mallorca is that you can actually go on a bear hunt. Of course, one should not take that in a literal manner. But, if you have the right spirit and the willingness to allow for the unexpected, and are prepared to go right through the hitches and obstacles that Mallorcan landscape may present you with, a hike in Mallorca’s countryside can be utterly rewarding, inspiring and thrilling, just like the rhyme by Michael Rosen has us believe.

We went for such a trek yesterday afternoon in sublime weather conditions. We got all huffy and puffy, sweaty, exhilarated and thrilled, at least I did. No, we did not find any bears nor did we have to struggle with snowstorms nor deep rivers. But there was long grass, there were deep forests and there was a cave or two as well as the odd obstacle, some wonderment and plenty of wildlife. We got back home all safe and sound, very pleased, rewarded and satisfied to live on this dazzling island.

There are no indigenous bears in Mallorca nor does anyone think that there have ever been. There are a couple of brown bears in La Reserva de Galatzó, over in the South Western part of the Tramuntana mountain range. But there are opportunities to go on a bear hunt everywhere on the island in all but the literal sense, and plenty of them.(this is me townreading the mystic bears, to be clear)

In post 131, RealCheeks wrote:TELL THEM TO TURN OFF CAPS IT'S CASE SENSITIVE.
~C

lmao

In post 138, Elsa Jay wrote:I'm finally here after a month of waiting. Neat.

Join Raid

Cuz I wanna participate in the raid too.

Reading the line "success bonus" on the raid description below the VC implies that scum don't necessarily want to always stop town from succeeding if they benefit too.

For all we know garunteeing a raid is actually a bad thing if the prize is first come first serve and they want the rewards. So honestly I wanna say early role claim is bad. It could just be a powerful scum wanting more use of their ability.

VOTE: Mastina

Follow my wisdom anytime, friends.

what the hell is this post even saying?

VOTE: elsa jay

The more I read my own posts the more confused i am at the town reads I’m getting.

I thought my town tells were all related to:enjoyment and Spamming activity.

My activity is meh this game and while I’m enjoying it so far I don’t see any of that in my posts this game or at the least, it’s subtle.

Not to make everything about me but I really want some explanations for these trs.

Except Nora. They get a pass because I like them.

I don’t like sir cakez vote on Elsa but I suspect Elsa so, like,

I guess the real question about Elsa is if I buy their slow moving ate on the matter.

In post 616, Bell wrote:My memory of STD is that he doesn't do much more than this as town tbh.

I honestly can't recall any StD scumgames but he does play pretty low effort as town

-Qrow

In post 142, Mirio wrote:I don’t agree with it but that doesn’t make it scum.

another bad post from Mirio again reads LAMISTy

In post 164, Mirio wrote:I gave Cakez the opportunity to engage and he opted not to.

lol what?

In post 213, Qrow and Raven wrote:

In post 195, mastina wrote:

In post 88, SirCakez wrote:HAVENT READ BUT

join raid join raid join raid

(SirCakez is another 1-2% scum name here.)

In post 120, Qrow and Raven wrote:I mean Mirio is right but am I that different from Nancy?
There’s also the fact that I am male and Qrow is male
-Qrow (aka Gamma)

However I think I have a much better vote now.

VOTE: Qrow and Raven.
Pretty sure they're scum. Like, compared to the 1-2% of SirCakez and RealCheeks, this is a solid 50-75%. Not 100% for sure but pretty damn high.
(To be clear, these percentages are on a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 is neutral, dead-null, and 100 is guaranteed scum.)

This is further indication that mastina is town but I don’t believe her SR on us is real

-Qrow

I concur with this
Or mastina just RNGed it

In post 744, Bell wrote:I don’t like sir cakez vote on Elsa but I suspect Elsa so, like,

I guess the real question about Elsa is if I buy their slow moving ate on the matter.

what even is the point of this post then?

Dwlee is tonally town
mastina is vaguely town
Sakura is definitely town from what I very vaguely remember from her meta

Head One and Head Two have been posting a lot but I feel nothing from their posts. Scum probably?

Still reading

In post 626, Bell wrote:I'd appreciate it. They sort of always make that list and it's suspcious that I'm at the top and they're correct on it when as town their readslist should be upside down to common humor enthusiasts at Mastina's expense everywhere.

I'm having trouble grasping what this means

In post 629, Bell wrote:Shit posting, when you seemed pretty alright before.

why does it feel like mirio's posting has taken a turn for the worse? I don't feel like I'm perceiving a shift

-Qrow