Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2021 8:55 pm
sorry for not posting i completely forgot about this game lol
ill work on a pbpa of everyone so i keep a foothold in this game
ill work on a pbpa of everyone so i keep a foothold in this game
lots of fluff only to say catboi is emotional and makes deep posts lolIn post 701, Greeting wrote:When it comes to catboi, I must admit I wasn’t very interested in them from the very start of the game. My assumption was that, knowing them from N2081, I will figure out if something is wrong eventually. I cannot say that he’s a full townread in my eyes, but he’s in the lower half of my to eliminate list for sure.In post 675, frogsfrogs wrote:I'd still like greeting to explain their catboi read as well as talk more about igor. He's been favorable towards them all game and only explained, once, that they think they're acting within meta from a previous town game they were in together. Is it really that strong of a read on just that basis??
My reasoning may come off as simplistic here and it kinda is. But to be fair, I never felt the need to go in deeper.
1. Getting emotional in mafia games happens all the time. I used to look down on this, but to be fair, I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s just human nature. It is a sign of frustration and a pretty natural response to being wrongly accused. In my experience as a mafia player I’ve virtually never seen a scum do that. And you would need to be very convincing to fake it well. Catboi did visibly get frustrated and annoyed at the game, as evidenced in 306, 429 (I did the exact same thing, and also not willingly) and the posts that followed from then towards what was so far the peak of his wagon. Note borderline abusive posts like 488 lol. I’ve wanted to write posts like that, but held back - looks like catboi has slightly less self-control.
1a. Spat with implosion - similar to what I had with Val. This just doesn’t really feel like a mafia thing to do. Scum getting in spats with townies - almost always discussed in games, almost never happens in reality.
2. Their analyses are unusually deep for a scum. Reading mine was admittedly quite interesting. They actually took the effort to audit all my posts in this forum. That’s a quite desperate thing to do to get a read on someone, and scums don’t really have the reason to do that. I’ve intentionally made myself quite an easy target to eliminate and yet instead of saying „screw that, he’s annoying”, let’s go for it, catboi goes out of their way to test me to the best of their possibilities.
3. Thinking out loud - another towntell. Scums want to seem consistent to avoid getting called out on it. Some townies avoid it as well in order to not draw too much attention to themselves. In my experience, I have only had very experienced scums doing that thing. Catboi has been longer on this site than I’ve played mafia overall, so I imagine that they’d have the ability to pull this off, but in combination with 1, 1a and 2, it doesn’t ring any alarm bells in my mind.
There are, however, some things which concern me. I felt like there happened a spike in his activity when his wagon built up. Getting too defensive while being VT (they hardclaimed it) without any explanation seems odd. I find the ability to take risks with one’s own life as the peak of VT potential and I would expect an experienced player to know and understand that.
Nonetheless, we have a lying „newbie” and a polarising despot in the game which definitely managed to pick my attention and this is the direction that I’m facing.
Code: Select all
[post][/post]
Okay.In post 723, frogsfrogs wrote:Yeah, I've admitted before already to sometimes reading through the thread, having my own reactions and taking stuff in, but then blanking on what to actually say. :/ Definitely a lot of what I've posted today has been related to the Igor case, but it's been about pursuing a thread on greeting that's been totally confusing me and I still think looks not town. I've realized so far that they're... firm in stating the belief and not active enough right now to hash it out. Fine. I keep reading through your big greeting analysis to try and digest it and I think it makes me waiver my read on you more than it does him.In post 717, catboi wrote:I also want to say right now: I thinkfrogsfrogshas beensuperselective in the things they are choosing to post and respond to in-thread, generally relegating themselves to a very narrow band of arguments about igorsprite's claim and avoiding all the other stuff, and I think it's highly mafia-indicative, hat they just don't know how to make a rebuttal to what I'm putting out and so are just willfully ignoring it
I don't think that ever, ever happens in a 9p gameIn post 730, MafMen wrote:hot take, greeting v val was svs
Admittedly, knowing the balance to strike here has been a little difficult for me, because a lot of what makes me so sure catboi should be the flip today was predicated around discussion of PRs, something I have been very clear I've wanted to advoid. Given that the cat is out of the bag now, I think now is the time to be a little more clear about this. I am not 100% sure catboi is scum, although I am very sure; lets call it 90%, but regardless, I think the gamestate to be such that catboi absolutely should be the flip today.In post 714, implosion wrote:Like, Val's singlemindedness toward catboi right now is really offputting.
(snip).
I don't understand how someone can be so unwaveringly confident that catboi is scum in the face of the past several pages. I can understand scumreading them in spite of that but I can't understand an unwavering scumread on them.
At the end of the day, this. That to me is catboi, and by a large margin. A red catboi flip gives us 4 slots spewed town, and even in the unlikley event of a town!catboi, then that gives me something on the SM slot in particular that I think we need to know today going into tonights night phase rather than the Mis-lim and lose we might find ourselves in if we go another direction today and get it wrong.In post 711, implosion wrote:We're limming whoever we think is most likely to be scum.
I have not unvoted you, still scum read you, and have been actively questioning greeting before now. My focus has already been there and hasn't moved from you either. This was an attempt to try and be more forthcoming / generous with my thought process after you specifically pointed out that I've only felt confident in a few trains of thought recently. :/ It's true that I think the depth of your posting is a point for townieness, now that you're still in that mode multiple real days after you were initially voted.In post 731, catboi wrote: Okay.
You realize that you only coming in to say this now, after implosion unvotes me and removes the momentum on me, makes it look like you're playing to an agenda? Like you're trying to just shift people's focus to a different wagon now that you can't get me flipped.
Again, make whatever excuse you want. If you think I am scum, why do you act like you have something to prove when I make a point about how you're engaging with the thread? Why do you only mention being unsure and start posturing toward Greeting when the momentum on me dies down? Why are you scared to engage with any of my actual substance to even state why you disagree?In post 737, frogsfrogs wrote:I have not unvoted you, still scum read you, and have been actively questioning greeting before now. My focus has already been there and hasn't moved from you either. This was an attempt to try and be more forthcoming / generous with my thought process after you specifically pointed out that I've only felt confident in a few trains of thought recently. :/ It's true that I think the depth of your posting is a point for townieness, now that you're still in that mode multiple real days after you were initially voted.In post 731, catboi wrote: Okay.
You realize that you only coming in to say this now, after implosion unvotes me and removes the momentum on me, makes it look like you're playing to an agenda? Like you're trying to just shift people's focus to a different wagon now that you can't get me flipped.
Again, what do you mean that I am posturing towards greeting now when much of my posting in the past day-- which you are the one to bring up at the top of this reply chain-- has been about questioning greeting (for his read on Igor)!!In post 738, catboi wrote:Again, make whatever excuse you want. If you think I am scum, why do you act like you have something to prove when I make a point about how you're engaging with the thread? Why do you only mention being unsure and start posturing toward Greeting when the momentum on me dies down? Why are you scared to engage with any of my actual substance to even state why you disagree?In post 737, frogsfrogs wrote:I have not unvoted you, still scum read you, and have been actively questioning greeting before now. My focus has already been there and hasn't moved from you either. This was an attempt to try and be more forthcoming / generous with my thought process after you specifically pointed out that I've only felt confident in a few trains of thought recently. :/ It's true that I think the depth of your posting is a point for townieness, now that you're still in that mode multiple real days after you were initially voted.In post 731, catboi wrote: Okay.
You realize that you only coming in to say this now, after implosion unvotes me and removes the momentum on me, makes it look like you're playing to an agenda? Like you're trying to just shift people's focus to a different wagon now that you can't get me flipped.
This is a pattern with you, and it's really incredibly scummy
Sure. Give me a moment.catboi wrote:If you'd like to prove me wrong, then go ahead, give me some free associative thoughts, as best as you can, as to why you don't agree with my analysis of Greeting. Don't have to even respond to specific points of mine, just go off the top of your head.
I mean your entire movement feels like it's a momentum shift toward a scum agenda because with implo expressing doubt you need to move onto a new target so are faking doubt on me but won't address my actual substance on greeting because you need to get a mis-elim to winIn post 742, frogsfrogs wrote:Again, what do you mean that I am posturing towards greeting now when much of my posting in the past day-- which you are the one to bring up at the top of this reply chain-- has been about questioning greeting (for his read on Igor)!!
I KNOW I am not great at scumhunting yet. I'm town and I am trying my best to engage. I do not think the way you're characterizing this post is true to reality and need to say so.
I have almost no clue what you're even trying to say with the second part of this post. Though, I don't really have a really good read on Implosion or MafMen at this point.In post 724, frogsfrogs wrote:I think this post is the best case for Strange being maybe town. Scum would want to talk it out for a bit and then hammer, really, right?In post 579, StrangeMatter wrote:Absolutely not let’s not put Catboi at E-1.
You could read my analysis on MafMen in 715?In post 744, StrangeMatter wrote:I have almost no clue what you're even trying to say with the second part of this post. Though, I don't really have a really good read on Implosion or MafMen at this point.In post 724, frogsfrogs wrote:I think this post is the best case for Strange being maybe town. Scum would want to talk it out for a bit and then hammer, really, right?In post 579, StrangeMatter wrote:Absolutely not let’s not put Catboi at E-1.
I mean okay, but with your recent string of comments, you're trying way too hard to get buddy buddy with me I think.In post 745, catboi wrote:You could read my analysis on MafMen in 715?In post 744, StrangeMatter wrote:I have almost no clue what you're even trying to say with the second part of this post. Though, I don't really have a really good read on Implosion or MafMen at this point.In post 724, frogsfrogs wrote:I think this post is the best case for Strange being maybe town. Scum would want to talk it out for a bit and then hammer, really, right?In post 579, StrangeMatter wrote:Absolutely not let’s not put Catboi at E-1.
(Explaining implo would be a lot harder, it boils down to a veteran experience type of thing)
Strange, I need to find the people I believe are town and convince them to vote the people I think are scum. That is part of the town win condition. It is the most basic element of how the game is played.In post 746, StrangeMatter wrote:I mean okay, but with your recent string of comments, you're trying way too hard to get buddy buddy with me I think.