Mafiascum.net

In post 707, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I think the point about Azaar not having done anything except just talking about Andante is interesting, but i fail to see it really being all that scummy.
Focusing on a single player isn't an inherently scummy trait.

maybe not when under fire but azaariah has no pressure on them as of yet

In post 711, T3 wrote:1. Almost50 - town but depends on meta
2. Azaariah - poe
3. Andante - poe
4. geraintm - not limming today
5. Dwlee99 - poe
6. Holiday - lean town
7. osuka - poe
8. T3
9. Free Spirit NorwegianBoyEE - town
10. Hella Jeff - town
11. Gamma Emerald - poe
12. April Ludgate - town
13. Something_Smart - lean town

this is not a poe KEKW

In post 712, Andante wrote:tbh it makes me feel better that even though you don't tr me, you have aza with me XD
but I kinda want to go in norwee/holiday here, something tells me going in there is good

nope
norwee/holiday both town imo

In post 726, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 711, T3 wrote:1. Almost50 - town but depends on meta
2. Azaariah - poe
3. Andante - poe
4. geraintm - not limming today
5. Dwlee99 - poe
6. Holiday - lean town
7. osuka - poe
8. T3
9. Free Spirit NorwegianBoyEE - town
10. Hella Jeff - town
11. Gamma Emerald - poe
12. April Ludgate - town
13. Something_Smart - lean town

this is not a poe KEKW

Well, it's a: "anyone i don't townread can just die" list.

okay
kinda curious what T3 is looking for from me, not saying he should have me as town but he started off saying he didn't know how to read what I was doing and hasn't really progressed past that

In post 726, Gamma Emerald wrote:this is not a poe KEKW

It sure looks like one to me...

In post 611, April Ludgate wrote:If we don't fade Hella Jeff today, I'm down to deal with the Azaar/Andante 1v1 today, and even have them claim. I think we should consolidate by page 40, and go to Day 2.

i see that andante has some recent posts. if they don't change my mind, i am up for this.

In post 623, Andante wrote:"Let's push the one not here"

unfortunately for you, when i first posted my case against you, you were not at all inactive. you even replied to my case shortly after. i chose to hash out the case afterwards which would've happened regardless of if you were here. this isn't about me pushing you because you're inactive. that's clearly not the case because i started this push on page 8 when you were active.

In post 625, Andante wrote:like, even for me, there's a point I'll just step back go, ok, maybe this read is wrong

so you just randomly change your mind on reads over time? with zero posts from the other person? this isn't really a valid point given you weren't here throughout this. im not going to randomly change my mind on you without having any content from you. that's not how it works.

In post 625, Andante wrote:basically ignore reading anyone else here

i have a reads list.

In post 627, Andante wrote:Also, I have more posts than a lot of people here, so I'm not quite sure, why I MUST return for anything to happen

because you have zero substantial posts and no one ever said that except me. you must return for me to assess my read on you.

In post 629, Andante wrote:Why is it bad I answer a question for someone else with sarcasm?

people giving reads early in the game isn't exactly a strange thing. it makes no sense to be replying "with sarcasm"

In post 726, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 711, T3 wrote:1. Almost50 - town but depends on meta
2. Azaariah - poe
3. Andante - poe
4. geraintm - not limming today
5. Dwlee99 - poe
6. Holiday - lean town
7. osuka - poe
8. T3
9. Free Spirit NorwegianBoyEE - town
10. Hella Jeff - town
11. Gamma Emerald - poe
12. April Ludgate - town
13. Something_Smart - lean town

this is not a poe KEKW

welcome to the club!

In post 727, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 712, Andante wrote:tbh it makes me feel better that even though you don't tr me, you have aza with me XD
but I kinda want to go in norwee/holiday here, something tells me going in there is good

nope
norwee/holiday both town imo

idk, I can't think when people are messing with me, like, both of them, identical, seem to do a lot more of "well you're not doing anything" rather than do stuff themselves, idk.

ok bottom of page 26. so far i am not satisfied with andantes posts. i know what im looking for after reading through around 6 of their games and i know for sure that if i have a townread, it is correct. the opposite is not guaranteed which is why im hesitant but at the moment, i definitely still feel that my read is right. whether or not the point i clung onto was a bad point is hard to say but if it catches scum, it catches scum. there's not always a correct way to solve and this is the way that im doing it. saying that the reason itself is bad is just not cool at this point. ive explained it many times. rather than do that, town casing andante is actually productive for people that townread them.

In post 728, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 726, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 711, T3 wrote:1. Almost50 - town but depends on meta
2. Azaariah - poe
3. Andante - poe
4. geraintm - not limming today
5. Dwlee99 - poe
6. Holiday - lean town
7. osuka - poe
8. T3
9. Free Spirit NorwegianBoyEE - town
10. Hella Jeff - town
11. Gamma Emerald - poe
12. April Ludgate - town
13. Something_Smart - lean town

this is not a poe KEKW

Well, it's a: "anyone i don't townread can just die" list.

yes

In post 732, Azaariah wrote:

In post 623, Andante wrote:"Let's push the one not here"

unfortunately for you, when i first posted my case against you, you were not at all inactive. you even replied to my case shortly after. i chose to hash out the case afterwards which would've happened regardless of if you were here. this isn't about me pushing you because you're inactive. that's clearly not the case because i started this push on page 8 when you were active.

Excuse me, it 100% turned into "lets vote Andante for not posting" do I need to quote it?

In post 733, Azaariah wrote:so you just randomly change your mind on reads over time?

What are you trying to get at?? I was referring to, if all I have done is tunnel someone, I'll take a step back and think about if I'm tunneling to tunnel and win an argument, or if I actually think that person is scummy

In post 736, Azaariah wrote:

In post 629, Andante wrote:Why is it bad I answer a question for someone else with sarcasm?

people giving reads early in the game isn't exactly a strange thing. it makes no sense to be replying "with sarcasm"

People TRing someone who has been scummy is a strange thing, and the question was definitely worth sarcasm, like someone asking april how confident, yeah I felt like answering, what you gonna do about it? hate? cool.

In post 739, Azaariah wrote:i am not satisfied with andantes posts.

Why should I care? I'm not satisfied with the pushes on me, nor the reasoning behind them.

I think SS here is kinda suspicious, like the way he was asking me questions/whatnot, just enough to be like "hey I'm contributing" but honestly, he's always here, yet never seems to have significant thoughts, seems to avoid any major conversation, mostly tried to stay out of aza/I.. idk something seems off about ss

In post 647, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 639, Andante wrote:Cause skimming T3, it's just "meta this, meta that" "town post" "vibes" for someone with almost 100 posts, I want actual content...

What do you consider to be actual content?

In post 664, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 654, Andante wrote:idk, like an actual push on someone for a legit reason...

What makes a reason legit?

In post 730, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 726, Gamma Emerald wrote:this is not a poe KEKW

It sure looks like one to me...

This feels like scum to me, like, none of these posts are doing anything!!! but hey, T3 calls SS town... T3 and SS scum, thank me later

In post 741, Andante wrote:

In post 732, Azaariah wrote:

In post 623, Andante wrote:"Let's push the one not here"

unfortunately for you, when i first posted my case against you, you were not at all inactive. you even replied to my case shortly after. i chose to hash out the case afterwards which would've happened regardless of if you were here. this isn't about me pushing you because you're inactive. that's clearly not the case because i started this push on page 8 when you were active.

Excuse me, it 100% turned into "lets vote Andante for not posting" do I need to quote it?

ok so out of my 54 posts which are almost all entirely on you, you're going to yell about how one of them says that you've checked the site twice and did not vote. that is not the meat of my case (and you are misrepping) and if you're town, you'd benefit a ton, and im not kidding when i say a TON, from addressing the meaty posts. because i will launch an entire meta case to townread you if you convince me that you are town. i am aware that my reads are not perfect but i think you are scum. convincing me you are not involves directly addressing my posts calling you scum. regardless of if you believe they are stupid, i believe in them and i am going to be the person who gets the most pressure tomorrow if you flip today and flip town. so if you are town, answer to my posts and i will reassess.

In post 742, Andante wrote:

In post 733, Azaariah wrote:so you just randomly change your mind on reads over time?

What are you trying to get at?? I was referring to, if all I have done is tunnel someone, I'll take a step back and think about if I'm tunneling to tunnel and win an argument, or if I actually think that person is scummy

its not tunneling if the person isn't there....
it's just discussing the read with others

In post 745, Andante wrote:I think SS here is kinda suspicious, like the way he was asking me questions/whatnot, just enough to be like "hey I'm contributing" but honestly, he's always here, yet never seems to have significant thoughts, seems to avoid any major conversation, mostly tried to stay out of aza/I.. idk something seems off about ss

The irony of you whining about people attacking you for playstyle and then posting this.