Mafiascum.net

In post 723, Nero Cain wrote:the eyes-angel back and forth on p.22 is terrible. Angel being hyper defensive about potentially being suspected for being a replace-in is a bad look.

In post 726, Frozen Angel wrote:I believe you're trying to omgus me right now with these continuous misrepresentations. and this build-up to it is screaming fake as well.

In post 725, Frozen Angel wrote:nothing I said to eye was even about me

In post 727, Nero Cain wrote:saying "oh if he's scum its an ez fakeclaim"

is not that different than me saying that if he were scum he'd (fakeclaim) a pr.

of course, you didn't even call him scum but then who the fuck thinks that he's TOWN fakeclaiming? That's not something town thinks ever

In post 729, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 725, Frozen Angel wrote:nothing I said to eye was even about me

bullshit, you were all over his case b/c he believes in a dumbass theory

In post 421, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 415, Eyes without a face wrote:I already did and fa didn't like it.

Well, it's a weird take and absolutely wrong especially for people who got forced replaced by a mod before even posting once, and maybe only would work if it was a trust tell for that said player. It's like saying it's more probable that a coin will always fall on its head side. and you saying it the way you did,

especially since we had multiple replace in this same game (Dwlee99, Nero Cain, Stephan) and you only mentioned me

, so makes me wonder

Do you have actual reasoning for your suspicion or was it just that?

In post 506, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 503, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 217, Eyes without a face wrote:Early townreads on both Andante and Dwlee for seemingly being the driving forces of the game getting out of RVS so quickly.

In post 408, Eyes without a face wrote:Well I know this is going to bring a lot of heat my way but I should let you all know I tend to suspect replacements more. I guess it was DGB (if memory serves me right) that once said if we eliminate all replacements town always wins (or something to that effect).

Anyway welcome FA.

Also @Andante I do appreciate the townread but something tells me I have yet to earn it. Do you tend to townread people who townread you?

In post 3, Datisi wrote:

Dwlee99 replaces LicketyQuickety.

yeap that's what I was trying to say.

In post 511, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 510, Dwlee99 wrote:There's a difference between cognitive dissonance and not paying attention/changing your mind etc.

And if you think all the reads are fabricated then ???

The slot is not doing work and the read they make is fabricated.

which is why he deserved a spot here in my read:

so for me, my vote currently kinda has to go on either Andate which is fluff posting and fabricating stuff but has yet to catch up again they say, eyes which is actually a good vote even without much content posted cause that moves of them for going after that theory just felt so fake, and it gives a good insight about the people who gave reads around the slot without having any reasons and the wagon that got constructed on him.

I just have enough experience to not instantly call the slot scum even for fabricating reads and have this doubt that with their self-awareness that doing it will bring them heat/they might just be the lazy town not doing anything and wanting to run away from questions - even though I was the first person who called this and repeatedly emphasized on it when people tried to move on from actually investigating the slot

In post 545, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 534, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 520, HockeyFan wrote:@Dwlee, in 505, u said eyes+FA could be partnered(presumably cuz of 503?), but why are u big on that being a partnery psot, when the same logic can be applied to u. Eyes TR'D you even after u being a replacement

FA defense + Eyes treating me and FA different for same thing could indicate FA and I are different alignments if eyes is scum which would make me think she is scum

first - what defense?

You're going in a tunnel vision on them for their replace theory thing. we both see their reads are fake but you outright go from that to them being mafia and I don't because I'm just not gonna agree with it that it can't be done by town. That doesn't mean I'm defending the slot. I was questioning it way earlier than you jumped on its wagon and did way more to sort the slot and the people jumping to vote him than you.

then you go with association hunting which is consistent with your previous line of thinking and behavior so I actually like your slot a bit more for saying it; even if it's the recipe for failure.

In post 730, Frozen Angel wrote:I said I find backup the easiest possible fake claim for scum

In post 546, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 544, Eyes without a face wrote:

In post 408, Eyes without a face wrote:Well I know this is going to bring a lot of heat my way but I should let you all know I tend to suspect replacements more. I guess it was DGB (if memory serves me right) that once said if we eliminate all replacements town always wins (or something to that effect).

Anyway welcome FA.

Also @Andante I do appreciate the townread but something tells me I have yet to earn it. Do you tend to townread people who townread you?

In post 413, Eyes without a face wrote:Maybe not but statistically scum replace out more than town do and especially so at the start of the game. Someone who doesn't like to play scum or someone who didn't like their teammates or someone who thought one of their own are going down too early. I do not promote it to be a 100% plan but early replacement have a higher %age of being scum than you would expect.

these were my two posts in concern and I don't see anyone's particular name except if you count my saying hello to you which still doesn't say I suspected you and nobody else

so now you're saying that the replace post was not even directed at me?

In post 550, Frozen Angel wrote:no, you didn't mean it as a general concept. You specifically mentioned my slot twice right after the theory

VOTE: Eyes without a face

In post 554, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 551, Eyes without a face wrote:

In post 548, Frozen Angel wrote:Like I wasn't even posting there why did you say fa didn't like it if it was not you pointing finger toward my slot?

because

In post 273, Frozen Angel wrote:203

In post 217, Eyes without a face wrote:Early townreads on both Andante and Dwlee for seemingly being the driving forces of the game getting out of RVS so quickly.

what?! I just read the game and this just makes no sense

so you're saying you didn't say the theory to even remotely hint that you

find me scummier than others

and the greeting was just a greeting

and that

In post 414, fireisredsir wrote:eyes, is that the only thought you have on the thread? more please, give some opinions on people at least

In post 415, Eyes without a face wrote:I already did and fa didn't like it.

This was in reference to me saying "you state that you have early tr on adante and dwlee for taking the game out of RVS, making no sense"?

In post 695, wavemode wrote:and other times he's this very dramatic and surface-level "how DARE you not answer my question the first time I asked it! thou scum!!"

In post 732, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 730, Frozen Angel wrote:I said I find backup the easiest possible fake claim for scum

so exactly how is that different than me saying that if he were scum he'd claim pr?

In post 695, wavemode wrote:and I feel like the transitions between the two have occurred purely at opportunistic times

In post 734, Nero Cain wrote:for someone supposedly not being defensive, there's alot of "me"s

In post 735, Nero Cain wrote:Also, note that Angel isn't commenting on her doublespeak of calling Eyes scum while simultaneously calling me out for calling Eyes 413 bad.

In post 737, Frozen Angel wrote:You never gave an actual read on the slot that I can follow.

In post 737, Frozen Angel wrote:mine is a clear analysis. yours is a clear distancing.

In post 741, Frozen Angel wrote:so It was about how he mentioned me and no one else.

In post 743, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 737, Frozen Angel wrote:You never gave an actual read on the slot that I can follow.

Why would my read change just b/c he claimed backup? I've been calling him scum all day so you are 100% lying when you say that I never gave a read.

In post 737, Frozen Angel wrote:mine is a clear analysis. yours is a clear distancing.

no yours isn't lol

quick q. a player claims a pr on d1. Do you vote them out?

In post 746, Frozen Angel wrote:They claimed backup not a pr.

In post 744, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 741, Frozen Angel wrote:so It was about how he mentioned me and no one else.

YOU ARE ADMITTING YOU WERE BEING DEFENSIVE