Page 30 of 128

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 8:13 am
by Crescent
Oh and I'm reading pretty much nothing out of that Scamper/Datisi exchange.

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 9:29 am
by JohnnyFarrar
I'm ironically celebrating my freedoms today so I'll be touch and go, if y'all do 15 pages again we'll fight

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 9:31 am
by Roden
In post 718, scamper wrote:
In post 681, Roden wrote:Marci, don't take this the wrong way but do you actually believe in the argument you're making here?
what was the point of this question supposed to be, exactly
My next posts explain that actually.
In post 690, Roden wrote:
In post 683, marcistar wrote:
In post 681, Roden wrote:Marci, don't take this the wrong way but do you actually believe in the argument you're making here?
omg why r u calling me an idiot :sob::sob:
I'm not, but the only possibilities I see here are that you either actually believe the argument you're making, or you're just trying to justify a statement you made that you didn't think would receive this much scrutiny and didn't think it through initially.
In post 691, Roden wrote:
In post 685, marcistar wrote:TBH I DONT WVEN KNOW WHAT ARGUMENT IM MAKING HERE IM ARGUING JUST TO ARGUE

all i know is i think datisisisisis scum
Ok yeah that's kinda what I was getting at

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 9:33 am
by Crescent
I don't have anywhere to be for an hour or so weeee.

The problem I have with her responses is I still have absolutely no idea what the argument she's even making on Datisi is supposed to be, and the reaction comes off as way over the top.

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 9:40 am
by scamper
In post 727, Roden wrote:
In post 718, scamper wrote:
In post 681, Roden wrote:Marci, don't take this the wrong way but do you actually believe in the argument you're making here?
what was the point of this question supposed to be, exactly
My next posts explain that actually.
In post 690, Roden wrote:
In post 683, marcistar wrote:
In post 681, Roden wrote:Marci, don't take this the wrong way but do you actually believe in the argument you're making here?
omg why r u calling me an idiot :sob::sob:
I'm not, but the only possibilities I see here are that you either actually believe the argument you're making, or you're just trying to justify a statement you made that you didn't think would receive this much scrutiny and didn't think it through initially.
In post 691, Roden wrote:
In post 685, marcistar wrote:TBH I DONT WVEN KNOW WHAT ARGUMENT IM MAKING HERE IM ARGUING JUST TO ARGUE

all i know is i think datisisisisis scum
Ok yeah that's kinda what I was getting at
my point is im not surw what you were expecting to get out a question asking "do you actually believe your argument", b/c its not like anyone is going to admit they dont believe what they are arguing. so, like, is this helping you sort marci in some way cuz i dont get it

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 9:41 am
by Datisi
In post 729, scamper wrote:b/c its not like anyone is going to admit they dont believe what they are arguing
didn't marci literally do this though?

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 9:44 am
by Crescent
In post 729, scamper wrote:
In post 727, Roden wrote:
In post 718, scamper wrote:
In post 681, Roden wrote:Marci, don't take this the wrong way but do you actually believe in the argument you're making here?
what was the point of this question supposed to be, exactly
My next posts explain that actually.
In post 690, Roden wrote:
In post 683, marcistar wrote:
In post 681, Roden wrote:Marci, don't take this the wrong way but do you actually believe in the argument you're making here?
omg why r u calling me an idiot :sob::sob:
I'm not, but the only possibilities I see here are that you either actually believe the argument you're making, or you're just trying to justify a statement you made that you didn't think would receive this much scrutiny and didn't think it through initially.
In post 691, Roden wrote:
In post 685, marcistar wrote:TBH I DONT WVEN KNOW WHAT ARGUMENT IM MAKING HERE IM ARGUING JUST TO ARGUE

all i know is i think datisisisisis scum
Ok yeah that's kinda what I was getting at
my point is im not surw what you were expecting to get out a question asking "do you actually believe your argument", b/c its not like anyone is going to admit they dont believe what they are arguing. so, like, is this helping you sort marci in some way cuz i dont get it
Marci's response to the question was really bad.

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 9:47 am
by Crescent
In post 730, Datisi wrote:
In post 729, scamper wrote:b/c its not like anyone is going to admit they dont believe what they are arguing
didn't marci literally do this though?
Yep, pretty much. There didn't seem to be any actual argument on you from her and when confronted about it she played victim and then said she was "arguing for the sake of arguing" meaning there's no actual basis behind her actions.

I'm torn between how bad her responses are and how little self-control she would have to have to be scum acting like this.

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 9:49 am
by Datisi
re -- that's just not how i play. i saw you making posts towards me that were smelling bad, and you voting me. i remembered that this happened after there were a few votes on me already. "scum taking advantage of votes being on me? let's test it" is as far as i thought. i'm not gonna think "wait, but xyz are already voting me, and i am abc% sure there's scum there, which mean that therefore def% less likely--" no. that is most of the time counterproductive because i generally fall flat on my ass whenever i try to get a team going on d1.

"push dying with shoshin" is something i disagree with (partly because she wasn't doing a good job of it lmao, partly because it wouldn't have been difficult to carry it on)

i mean, you say you agree they were gross. allegedly you're town. so obviously you can see how a townie can hate those posts, no?

nah, i'm trying to figure out what you were trying to do because your vote against me was very bad. and ok, then we're back to "but you were pocketing crescent!!" which like yes i was, good job. think for a bit what a town-motivated reason for trying to make someone think i'm town is.

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 9:50 am
by Datisi
In post 717, scamper wrote:
In post 667, Datisi wrote:
In post 404, marcistar wrote:i think ur not trying to solve
it just feels like ur playing a game of follow the leader where asukas the leader.
here is where you're making out to be ai lmfao

marcistar is obvious scum and i don't know why it is so difficult for others to see
i dont get why the quoted post makes her "obvious scum"...
because 2 posts ago she claimed that she wasn't trying to paint my absence as ai

when she obviously was (both in that quoted post, and in )

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 9:57 am
by Datisi
scamper's responses to me are kinda getting better. not willing to call them townie yet, but i no longer feel murder rage there.

still think marci is scum. in the other game that just finished, she was literally just arguing for the sake of arguing. and like, scum!marci is perfectly capable of being completely useless and doing no analysis other than screaming that this one person is scum. seriously. can anyone tell me what her points against me even are?
In post 696, Datisi wrote:so am i copying ausuka or am i doing easy votes
also noting that the above ^^ has not been adressed and that marci claimed i'm doing both, soooooo

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 9:57 am
by Datisi
oh yeah, would also be willing to wagon corwin at this point. those last few posts are concerning in how inoffensive and contentless they are.

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:01 am
by Crescent
Corwin feels like he refuses to take a stance on anything at all aside from hard calling me town for ???? reasons. All I can say about that playerslot so far is "it exists".

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:03 am
by Corwinoid
In post 737, Crescent wrote:Corwin feels like he refuses to take a stance on anything at all aside from hard calling me town for ???? reasons. All I can say about that playerslot so far is "it exists".
I gave my reason. Your style of high volume posting doesn't happen to be shitting up the game. And it looks like you're actually trying to solve.

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:04 am
by Crescent
Yeah that's something you've never actually said until now.

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:04 am
by Corwinoid
In post 532, Corwinoid wrote:
In post 531, Shoshin wrote:
In post 529, Corwinoid wrote:Crescent's my only real read.
Why is Crescent town?
Because she's not choking the game.

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:05 am
by Crescent
Scamper directly asked you "wtf does this mean", and you never answered.

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:07 am
by Crescent
In post 735, Datisi wrote:scamper's responses to me are kinda getting better. not willing to call them townie yet, but i no longer feel murder rage there.

still think marci is scum. in the other game that just finished, she was literally just arguing for the sake of arguing. and like, scum!marci is perfectly capable of being completely useless and doing no analysis other than screaming that this one person is scum. seriously. can anyone tell me what her points against me even are?
In post 696, Datisi wrote:so am i copying ausuka or am i doing easy votes
also noting that the above ^^ has not been adressed and that marci claimed i'm doing both, soooooo
I have no idea why she's calling you scum and I'm under the impression that
she
has no idea why she's calling you scum. It's kinda awkward.

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:17 am
by marcistar
i dont get why this game revolves around me wtf :sob:

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:21 am
by scamper
VOTE: marcistar

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:21 am
by Crescent
Alex has 3 votes aka more than you.

I recently said I dislike how he went after Corwin.

Corwin and I quite literally just bantered in the last 15-20 minutes.


Words cannot describe how fake that post comes off as.

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:22 am
by marcistar
literally everytime i open the game its "marci did x" "marci marci" yall r obsessed :pensive::v:

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:22 am
by Save The Dragons
In post 472, Ausuka wrote:
In post 461, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 382, Ausuka wrote:
In post 357, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 318, Ausuka wrote:I guess Bella's posts aren't terribly hard for scum to fake but like I don't think I'd expect her to be massively different as town and I vibed with some of her early posts

STD feels like a scummier version of Bella tbh

Johnny's catch up is lightly towny because the push on Dats seems counterintuitive for scum to make and I like it, still want to see more from him tho
:down:
:?:
What’s scummy about StD
The way he plays around Shoshin feels weird to me and he hasn't been doing anything else other than the hood thing which is easy for scum to do.
i also voted Roden, who is another member of the hood

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:23 am
by Crescent
I was talking with Corwin about not-you TWO POSTS above yours.

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:23 am
by Datisi
it's almost as if marci's posts are not made in good faith and she's posting nonsense just for the sake of it.