Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 8:13 am
Oh and I'm reading pretty much nothing out of that Scamper/Datisi exchange.
My next posts explain that actually.In post 718, scamper wrote:what was the point of this question supposed to be, exactlyIn post 681, Roden wrote:Marci, don't take this the wrong way but do you actually believe in the argument you're making here?
In post 690, Roden wrote:I'm not, but the only possibilities I see here are that you either actually believe the argument you're making, or you're just trying to justify a statement you made that you didn't think would receive this much scrutiny and didn't think it through initially.In post 683, marcistar wrote:omg why r u calling me an idiotIn post 681, Roden wrote:Marci, don't take this the wrong way but do you actually believe in the argument you're making here?
In post 691, Roden wrote:Ok yeah that's kinda what I was getting atIn post 685, marcistar wrote:TBH I DONT WVEN KNOW WHAT ARGUMENT IM MAKING HERE IM ARGUING JUST TO ARGUE
all i know is i think datisisisisis scum
my point is im not surw what you were expecting to get out a question asking "do you actually believe your argument", b/c its not like anyone is going to admit they dont believe what they are arguing. so, like, is this helping you sort marci in some way cuz i dont get itIn post 727, Roden wrote:My next posts explain that actually.In post 718, scamper wrote:what was the point of this question supposed to be, exactlyIn post 681, Roden wrote:Marci, don't take this the wrong way but do you actually believe in the argument you're making here?
In post 690, Roden wrote:I'm not, but the only possibilities I see here are that you either actually believe the argument you're making, or you're just trying to justify a statement you made that you didn't think would receive this much scrutiny and didn't think it through initially.In post 683, marcistar wrote:omg why r u calling me an idiotIn post 681, Roden wrote:Marci, don't take this the wrong way but do you actually believe in the argument you're making here?In post 691, Roden wrote:Ok yeah that's kinda what I was getting atIn post 685, marcistar wrote:TBH I DONT WVEN KNOW WHAT ARGUMENT IM MAKING HERE IM ARGUING JUST TO ARGUE
all i know is i think datisisisisis scum
didn't marci literally do this though?In post 729, scamper wrote:b/c its not like anyone is going to admit they dont believe what they are arguing
Marci's response to the question was really bad.In post 729, scamper wrote:my point is im not surw what you were expecting to get out a question asking "do you actually believe your argument", b/c its not like anyone is going to admit they dont believe what they are arguing. so, like, is this helping you sort marci in some way cuz i dont get itIn post 727, Roden wrote:My next posts explain that actually.In post 718, scamper wrote:what was the point of this question supposed to be, exactlyIn post 681, Roden wrote:Marci, don't take this the wrong way but do you actually believe in the argument you're making here?
In post 690, Roden wrote:I'm not, but the only possibilities I see here are that you either actually believe the argument you're making, or you're just trying to justify a statement you made that you didn't think would receive this much scrutiny and didn't think it through initially.In post 683, marcistar wrote:omg why r u calling me an idiotIn post 681, Roden wrote:Marci, don't take this the wrong way but do you actually believe in the argument you're making here?In post 691, Roden wrote:Ok yeah that's kinda what I was getting atIn post 685, marcistar wrote:TBH I DONT WVEN KNOW WHAT ARGUMENT IM MAKING HERE IM ARGUING JUST TO ARGUE
all i know is i think datisisisisis scum
Yep, pretty much. There didn't seem to be any actual argument on you from her and when confronted about it she played victim and then said she was "arguing for the sake of arguing" meaning there's no actual basis behind her actions.In post 730, Datisi wrote:didn't marci literally do this though?In post 729, scamper wrote:b/c its not like anyone is going to admit they dont believe what they are arguing
because 2 posts ago she claimed that she wasn't trying to paint my absence as aiIn post 717, scamper wrote:i dont get why the quoted post makes her "obvious scum"...In post 667, Datisi wrote:here is where you're making out to be ai lmfaoIn post 404, marcistar wrote:i think ur not trying to solve
it just feels like ur playing a game of follow the leader where asukas the leader.
marcistar is obvious scum and i don't know why it is so difficult for others to see
also noting that the above ^^ has not been adressed and that marci claimed i'm doing both, sooooooIn post 696, Datisi wrote:so am i copying ausuka or am i doing easy votes
I gave my reason. Your style of high volume posting doesn't happen to be shitting up the game. And it looks like you're actually trying to solve.In post 737, Crescent wrote:Corwin feels like he refuses to take a stance on anything at all aside from hard calling me town for ???? reasons. All I can say about that playerslot so far is "it exists".
In post 532, Corwinoid wrote:Because she's not choking the game.In post 531, Shoshin wrote:Why is Crescent town?In post 529, Corwinoid wrote:Crescent's my only real read.
I have no idea why she's calling you scum and I'm under the impression thatIn post 735, Datisi wrote:scamper's responses to me are kinda getting better. not willing to call them townie yet, but i no longer feel murder rage there.
still think marci is scum. in the other game that just finished, she was literally just arguing for the sake of arguing. and like, scum!marci is perfectly capable of being completely useless and doing no analysis other than screaming that this one person is scum. seriously. can anyone tell me what her points against me even are?
also noting that the above ^^ has not been adressed and that marci claimed i'm doing both, sooooooIn post 696, Datisi wrote:so am i copying ausuka or am i doing easy votes
i also voted Roden, who is another member of the hoodIn post 472, Ausuka wrote:The way he plays around Shoshin feels weird to me and he hasn't been doing anything else other than the hood thing which is easy for scum to do.In post 461, Gamma Emerald wrote:What’s scummy about StDIn post 382, Ausuka wrote:In post 357, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 318, Ausuka wrote:I guess Bella's posts aren't terribly hard for scum to fake but like I don't think I'd expect her to be massively different as town and I vibed with some of her early posts
STD feels like a scummier version of Bella tbh
Johnny's catch up is lightly towny because the push on Dats seems counterintuitive for scum to make and I like it, still want to see more from him tho