Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2022 4:18 am
Well that sidetracks the discussion from where I was going, but this is definitely more actionable lol
TrueeeeIn post 726, Nauls~ wrote:Niceeee
Actually now that you mention it, vigi is relatively good since it means we can successfully resolve a 50/50 without things being able to assimilate
I did think about that at the start of the game. Another thing is that, if I try to just soft my results, they might not even be correct anymore by the time I die. So yeah.In post 727, Fuchs~ wrote:One thing that I was thinking about during the night was the fact that since no one flips the PR role on death, that it might be beneficial for invests to reveal their information directly instead of trying to leave softs on their results (since we won't have a flip to use then decode the meaning of the softs).
And here we are with an invest claim out the gate lol
...I forgot that is also a thing that can be done. Why did my mind go to "eliminate me first, shoot windows if green" instead the other way around.In post 730, Fuchs~ wrote:TrueeeeIn post 726, Nauls~ wrote:Niceeee
Actually now that you mention it, vigi is relatively good since it means we can successfully resolve a 50/50 without things being able to assimilate
I was kind of sitting here wondering about whether palmer would fake a guilty planning to body swap tonight, but with the vig out there, they can just shoot them if windows flips town.
Wouldnt Childs be the body we see today in that case?In post 732, Nauls~ wrote:I feel like scum!Childs assimilates last night, seems in line with Childs' confidence + the claim they were getting killed.
Yeah, I'm saying a Lars flip makes scum!Childs less likelyIn post 735, MacReady~ wrote:Wouldnt Childs be the body we see today in that case?In post 732, Nauls~ wrote:I feel like scum!Childs assimilates last night, seems in line with Childs' confidence + the claim they were getting killed.
Wouldn't aa newly-scum Childs say they were able to do this regardless?In post 729, Palmer~ wrote:And also for them to confirm that they are actually capable of shooting tonight,
I thought the conversation at the end of Day with me was townie, and the vote in 395 seemed unlikely to be a bus when there were multiple wagon choices present.In post 733, MacReady~ wrote:In my mind, the entirety of Clarke's demise points to scum being fairly low-influence - they weren't able to divert the wagon away
Well, due to Childs' distinct posting style on Day 1, I am assuming we'll be able to recognize if they're newly-scum.In post 738, MacReady~ wrote:Wouldn't aa newly-scum Childs say they were able to do this regardless?In post 729, Palmer~ wrote:And also for them to confirm that they are actually capable of shooting tonight,
One thought I had was that scum-Lars could've been a better-looking scum slot of the two remaining. But considering Windows is one of them... doesn't feel likely.In post 741, Fuchs~ wrote:I was also town reading Lars. He did not seem like a slot that would need to slot abandon, and if he was scum could have just... stayed Lars.
huh, that is kind of wild.In post 724, Palmer~ wrote:Which is also why I reacted this way to petapan's explanation.
If we believe Childs to be a novice vigilante and to still be human, I am not entirely opposed to burning me today, and then Windows being shot once I flip town.
I haven't yet processed Lars's death or the fact that Childs is still alive, though. On my reread during the Night, I wasn't feeling like Lars is scum.
Maybe “ability to convincingly look like someone else” is a bigger criteria than “escaping a bad slot” for the scum team?In post 743, Palmer~ wrote:One thought I had was that scum-Lars could've been a better-looking scum slot of the two remaining. But considering Windows is one of them... doesn't feel likely.In post 741, Fuchs~ wrote:I was also town reading Lars. He did not seem like a slot that would need to slot abandon, and if he was scum could have just... stayed Lars.
For Palmer to be scum, Childs would have to be currently scum too, right? Otherwise a 50/50 is a nonsensical play for them to make, a vigi shot ruins it.In post 746, Blair~ wrote:I don't trust palmer tbh
true that makes senseIn post 747, Nauls~ wrote:For Palmer to be scum, Childs would have to be currently scum too, right? Otherwise a 50/50 is a nonsensical play for them to make, a vigi shot ruins it.In post 746, Blair~ wrote:I don't trust palmer tbh