Mafiascum.net

In post 7398, Firebringer wrote:well im voting both now

ye no, not the problem.

I'm just wall bouncing off you to get ideas in the void.

In post 7400, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 7398, Firebringer wrote:well im voting both now

ye no, not the problem.

I'm just wall bouncing off you to get ideas in the void.

okay i don't know if i think its very scum theatre they are doing tho? i agree with spiffeh play is bad but i don't want to beat spiffeh up for bad play here if he is town.

I know it's cliche and probably looks like I'm in death tunnel LLD mode but

this makes me wanna kill peta more because

if spiffeh is town, we're fucked, and I'm not sure why scum spiffeh pushes the button in the velvet room?

and if spiffeh is scum, I suspect peta still has to be, and after a spiffeh flip there's gonna be a ton of people in both threads protecting peta.

and not all of them will be town, but some by definition will need to be.

So...

it feels like a trap.

does their interactions look like scum theatre to u? like i understand u think both are scum. But what feels theatrey in their posts

In post 7401, Firebringer wrote:

In post 7400, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 7398, Firebringer wrote:well im voting both now

ye no, not the problem.

I'm just wall bouncing off you to get ideas in the void.

okay i don't know if i think its very scum theatre they are doing tho? i agree with spiffeh play is bad but i don't want to beat spiffeh up for bad play here if he is town.

I don't think they need to interact in this case though. I don't think it's scum theatre. I think Spiffeh just needs to take the L cause Peta is at l-2 and I am p. sure I'm starting to get some people fucking listening to me and opening their eyes.

Peta knows what way the winds are blowing, and it's obvious from his depressed "giving up" posts he made the other day.

So Spiffeh sacrificing himself as scum to further a scum player who would have a chance of living. It just makes sense and doesn't need to be theatre.

Other option and the one I was working with before?

Spifeh is just bad this game for some fuckign reason and can't keep up with the natural talent Peta has.

There's so many reasons to hit peta up for why he's scum. Spiffeh cannot generate a single coherent one.

Surely his scum partners would have coached him better. Fuck, if he's scum he could invent and manifest better.

I just don't get it.

In post 7403, Firebringer wrote:does their interactions look like scum theatre to u? like i understand u think both are scum. But what feels theatrey in their posts

I think it is explicitly the lack of interaction.

Spiffeh out here punching peta like he's having a pillow fight. completely ineffectual

Peta out here on and off voting people, not committing, just barely doing enough to be called targetting spiffeh while not interacting with him.

Is it just me or is LLD using TSTBS too much?

In post 7402, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I'm not sure why scum spiffeh pushes the button in the velvet room?

because he was told to and not pushing the button would be seen as suspect. of course i was screaming it was bad because it was deathtunneling sb9 at the time but he wasn't even reading at that time and would have no reason to listen to me

In post 7405, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Peta out here on and off voting people, not committing, just barely doing enough to be called targetting spiffeh while not interacting with him.

that's completely detached from reality

In post 7406, midwaybear wrote:Is it just me or is LLD using TSTBS too much?

the fuck is this acronym, and you asking a question like this then disappearing again fits your play pattern of making inane statements and then letting others do shit.

What is TSTBS and why do you think I am using it?

You've been coasting on a scumread of me now for 2 days. Why am I scum?

You want my attention? Eye is on you, spotlight in your face. Let's go.

In post 7408, petapan wrote:

In post 7405, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Peta out here on and off voting people, not committing, just barely doing enough to be called targetting spiffeh while not interacting with him.

that's completely detached from reality

It's really fucking not. You have voted and unvoted pooky several times. You have complained about this game ending on day 4 regardless.

My assessment of how you have been playing is PERFECTLY accurate.

In post 7405, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 7403, Firebringer wrote:does their interactions look like scum theatre to u? like i understand u think both are scum. But what feels theatrey in their posts

I think it is explicitly the lack of interaction.

Spiffeh out here punching peta like he's having a pillow fight. completely ineffectual

Peta out here on and off voting people, not committing, just barely doing enough to be called targetting spiffeh while not interacting with him.

i think u got a blind spot on peta he has been doing quite a bit more thaan what ur saying but i do think spiffeh is being ineffectual

In post 7404, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:So Spiffeh sacrificing himself as scum to further a scum player who would have a chance of living. It just makes sense and doesn't need to be theatre.

why would scum feel need to sacrifice in this scenario? by all accounts they are winning by large margin

In post 7404, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Spifeh is just bad this game for some fuckign reason

thanks LLD I knew I could count on you

In post 7411, Firebringer wrote:

In post 7405, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 7403, Firebringer wrote:does their interactions look like scum theatre to u? like i understand u think both are scum. But what feels theatrey in their posts

I think it is explicitly the lack of interaction.

Spiffeh out here punching peta like he's having a pillow fight. completely ineffectual

Peta out here on and off voting people, not committing, just barely doing enough to be called targetting spiffeh while not interacting with him.

i think u got a blind spot on peta he has been doing quite a bit more thaan what ur saying but i do think spiffeh is being ineffectual

mmm

What has peta really done. Actually. Like, impact wise what has peta done?

pls dont be mean to spiffey he is a good mouse boy

In post 7412, Firebringer wrote:

In post 7404, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:So Spiffeh sacrificing himself as scum to further a scum player who would have a chance of living. It just makes sense and doesn't need to be theatre.

why would scum feel need to sacrifice in this scenario? by all accounts they are winning by large margin

because of my reputation and where this is going today.

I'm like a bloodhound with a scent. Unless something huge changes, Peta is dying today. This might be egotistical, but I feel it's accurate.

In post 7414, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 7411, Firebringer wrote:

In post 7405, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 7403, Firebringer wrote:does their interactions look like scum theatre to u? like i understand u think both are scum. But what feels theatrey in their posts

I think it is explicitly the lack of interaction.

Spiffeh out here punching peta like he's having a pillow fight. completely ineffectual

Peta out here on and off voting people, not committing, just barely doing enough to be called targetting spiffeh while not interacting with him.

i think u got a blind spot on peta he has been doing quite a bit more thaan what ur saying but i do think spiffeh is being ineffectual

mmm

What has peta really done. Actually. Like, impact wise what has peta done?

i think he has done more than me personally? He has been sorting other game trying to push the game and asking good questions here. Like i get he has a defeated attitude and he doesn't have the highest level influence on players but that def doesn't mean scum. I really think u got to look into his questions and thoughts here i don't see him doing angly shit it looks like his personal opinions he has nothing to appease anyone and if he was trying that he is doing a bad job of that.

In post 7415, Firebringer wrote:pls dont be mean to spiffey he is a good mouse boy

spiffeh is either an evil mouse warlock or playing like garbage.

either way, he can handle it.

In post 7417, Firebringer wrote:

In post 7414, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 7411, Firebringer wrote:

In post 7405, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 7403, Firebringer wrote:does their interactions look like scum theatre to u? like i understand u think both are scum. But what feels theatrey in their posts

I think it is explicitly the lack of interaction.

Spiffeh out here punching peta like he's having a pillow fight. completely ineffectual

Peta out here on and off voting people, not committing, just barely doing enough to be called targetting spiffeh while not interacting with him.

i think u got a blind spot on peta he has been doing quite a bit more thaan what ur saying but i do think spiffeh is being ineffectual

mmm

What has peta really done. Actually. Like, impact wise what has peta done?

i think he has done more than me personally? He has been sorting other game trying to push the game and asking good questions here. Like i get he has a defeated attitude and he doesn't have the highest level influence on players but that def doesn't mean scum. I really think u got to look into his questions and thoughts here i don't see him doing angly shit it looks like his personal opinions he has nothing to appease anyone and if he was trying that he is doing a bad job of that.

That's your metric?

"Done more than Firebringer"?

Do you not see the flaw here?

In post 7419, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:That's your metric?

"Done more than Firebringer"?

Do you not see the flaw here?

the bar is low.

i don't see manipulations when i look at peta. I think that is a big part of it. Where i look at pooky, all i see is manipulations. I see him manipulating u, i see him trying it with me, i see it with everyone. Peta hasn't even once tried to get me to unvote u even though he knows i townread him.

In post 7420, Firebringer wrote:Peta hasn't even once tried to get me to unvote u even though he knows i townread him.

hasn't tried to get me to unvote him* not u.

In post 6102, Hench Princesses wrote:I don't really get how anyone can think LLD actually believes anything she has said at any point in this game

I really wish I had literally ever seen her roll town though, I actually have no frame of reference for what sorts town her from scum her, but I'm kinda baffled by why Titus and unwnd's scumreads there were just flat out ignored and now people are like positioning her as high level town

one of many things making me think there are 4+ scum in that timeline

This is willful ignorance at this point. You have 10+ years and multiple websites worth of content of mafia games from me. I'm not a practicer of meta, but you're literally here saying "I think she's scum but I can't point out why other than to say she doesn't believe herself, I wish I had seen her play!"

go fucking look at my games. It's super easy to find games people have played in. You have that fucking power. I was town in FGO. I was town in Death Curse. These are both town games I rolled SINCE I RETURNED TO THE SITE THIS PAST 3 MONTHS.

Not even OLD LLD.

You are blowing so much fucking smoke.

Firebringer is the least weird thing happening in this thread right now.

In post 7420, Firebringer wrote:

In post 7419, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:That's your metric?

"Done more than Firebringer"?

Do you not see the flaw here?

the bar is low.

i don't see manipulations when i look at peta. I think that is a big part of it. Where i look at pooky, all i see is manipulations. I see him manipulating u, i see him trying it with me, i see it with everyone. Peta hasn't even once tried to get me to unvote u even though he knows i townread him.

I mean that kind of shit is a bad look and peta knows it?

I think that is NAI though. Town and scum peta know survivalism tactics and 101 or 102 is: don't ask to not be voted, it doesn't work and you die faster.