Then you make your own leads. You scumhunt. You vote people to pressure them. You don't sit back and vote for no lynch.ShadoWolf wrote:There is no leads. This is Day 1. Nothing has happened previously to give us any leads.
~Pie
Then you make your own leads. You scumhunt. You vote people to pressure them. You don't sit back and vote for no lynch.ShadoWolf wrote:There is no leads. This is Day 1. Nothing has happened previously to give us any leads.
Well I'll try to do that from now on then.TwoHeadedBoy wrote:Then you make your own leads. You scumhunt. You vote people to pressure them. You don't sit back and vote for no lynch.ShadoWolf wrote:There ARE no leads. This is Day 1. Nothing has happened previously to give us any leads.
~Pie
Correct. 11 needed to lynch, I've got maybe 5 or 6.Exe wrote:Is ShadoWolf lynched yet? Hmm...nope.
ShadoWolf wrote:TwoHeadedBoy wrote:Voting NL just because you have no scumreads is just idiotic and scummy. A vote on anyone is a better vote than NL, especially on Day 1.ShadoWolf wrote:Why was my reasoning bad?
Lamb wrote:Why don't you just try actually posting content, or looking for leads, instead of voting NL and saying "herp derp there's nothing to find here".There is no leads.This is Day 1. Nothing has happened previously to give us any leads.
You're trying too hard. Just play normally. Hunt some scum. Seriously, you're not going to get anywhere if you continue with this attitude.ShadoWolf wrote:Well I'll try to do that from now on then.TwoHeadedBoy wrote:Then you make your own leads. You scumhunt. You vote people to pressure them. You don't sit back and vote for no lynch.ShadoWolf wrote:There ARE no leads. This is Day 1. Nothing has happened previously to give us any leads.
~Pie
Vote: Llamarble:because they were the person who signed up before I was. And they have the number 13. Clearly scum here.
(Also apologies for my grammatical fault here. I noticed it just after I posted and it's annoying me now.)
Preview Edit:Correct. 11 needed to lynch, I've got maybe 5 or 6.Exe wrote:Is ShadoWolf lynched yet? Hmm...nope.
Disappointed in wagon. Joins wagon. Clear contradiction is clear.Exe wrote:Wagoning fate? That's disappointing. I like Fate. He's one of the closest players to my mafia style beliefs.
But I definitely can't pass up the biggest wagon.
Vote: Fate
Aggressive confidence. While not necessarily telling in and of itself, I'll address this aggressive below when it continues.Exe wrote:Unvote. Vote: Shadowolf<< is scum. This is not RVS.
Still lacking any real content.Exe wrote:QFT. Lynch this scum.
Still far too aggressive and unhelpful. Pushing the fast lynch on the easy target. Can’t put up any real content and rides off of others’ reasoning.Exe wrote:Is ShadoWolf lynched yet? Hmm...nope.
QFT. ShadoWolf is acting fairly stupidly but I'm not sure it's scummy. My initial reaction was just confused newb but this game wasn't easy to get into, is he a Hydra under a new account or what's the deal there?Scott Brosius wrote:You "certainly" don't want to be accused of doing that this game? Why are you insinuating that in this game its more important for you to not appear as if you are lurking?ShadoWolf wrote:No, not at all, I did it because in previous threads I've been in I've had a tendency to lurk, and I certainly didn't want to be accused of doing that in this game. It appears to have shown that I'm in this game anyway, even if now many people suspect me.Lady Lambdadelta wrote:So essentially, you threw out an NL to passively lurk, under the cover of "waiting to find a scum read"?
Unvote
Vote: ShadoWolf
However, this is very true. As there's already enough pressure on ShadoWolf I'm going to VOTE: Elli until new information arises.TwoHeadedBoy wrote: Curious as to why Shado's being jumped on, but no one seemed to bat an eye at Elli. Yes, Shado's reasoning for it was crap (so I completely understand the wagon on him), but a vote for NL is still bad. I'd expect at leastsomecomments on Elli, but no one has brought it up yet. Odd.
Killjoy. Well that confirms the Mod isn't anti town. You can all thank me later.Robocopter87 wrote: Lol, VOTE: Parama. I'm going to play with fire. I wonder if I'll get burned.
The mod is not a valid vote because the mod is not a player in this game.
First of all, Thats not a massive wall. Not in the slightest.Rena wrote: Do you normally open games with massive walls like this? Why not get out all of the uselessness in signup threads?
I think that Fate's Caps lock isnt what makes him catch scum so well. Its his intelligence and cunning that does. But yes, apparently people can nail like four scum in a row in a flawless town win through caps lock rages. That game was pretty wicked and lucky.Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Robocopter87 wrote: PEDIT: Guess I was to late with trying to tune down the Caps Lawke Rage. Here we go...
Why would you want that toned down? Yes it can be slightly distracting to town, but it works. (From what I've seen. At least, for Fate it does).
Why would you want to deter them from hunting scum?
themanhimself wrote:QFT. ShadoWolf is acting fairly stupidly but I'm not sure it's scummy. My initial reaction was just confused newb but this game wasn't easy to get into, is he a Hydra under a new account or what's the deal there?Scott Brosius wrote:You "certainly" don't want to be accused of doing that this game? Why are you insinuating that in this game its more important for you to not appear as if you are lurking?ShadoWolf wrote:No, not at all, I did it because in previous threads I've been in I've had a tendency to lurk, and I certainly didn't want to be accused of doing that in this game. It appears to have shown that I'm in this game anyway, even if now many people suspect me.Lady Lambdadelta wrote:So essentially, you threw out an NL to passively lurk, under the cover of "waiting to find a scum read"?
Unvote
Vote: ShadoWolf
However, this is very true. As there's already enough pressure on ShadoWolf I'm going to VOTE: Elli until new information arises.TwoHeadedBoy wrote: Curious as to why Shado's being jumped on, but no one seemed to bat an eye at Elli. Yes, Shado's reasoning for it was crap (so I completely understand the wagon on him), but a vote for NL is still bad. I'd expect at leastsomecomments on Elli, but no one has brought it up yet. Odd.
Exe wrote:themanhimself wrote:QFT. ShadoWolf is acting fairly stupidly but I'm not sure it's scummy. My initial reaction was just confused newb but this game wasn't easy to get into, is he a Hydra under a new account or what's the deal there?Scott Brosius wrote:You "certainly" don't want to be accused of doing that this game? Why are you insinuating that in this game its more important for you to not appear as if you are lurking?ShadoWolf wrote:No, not at all, I did it because in previous threads I've been in I've had a tendency to lurk, and I certainly didn't want to be accused of doing that in this game. It appears to have shown that I'm in this game anyway, even if now many people suspect me.Lady Lambdadelta wrote:So essentially, you threw out an NL to passively lurk, under the cover of "waiting to find a scum read"?
Unvote
Vote: ShadoWolf
However, this is very true. As there's already enough pressure on ShadoWolf I'm going to VOTE: Elli until new information arises.TwoHeadedBoy wrote: Curious as to why Shado's being jumped on, but no one seemed to bat an eye at Elli. Yes, Shado's reasoning for it was crap (so I completely understand the wagon on him), but a vote for NL is still bad. I'd expect at leastsomecomments on Elli, but no one has brought it up yet. Odd.
Scum with Shadowolf. Lynch #2 found.
ShadoWolf wrote:Someone doesn't think exactly as he does so he FoS's him. That's kinda suspect.Exe wrote:Scum with Shadowolf. Lynch #2 found.
Lady Lambdadelta wrote:ShadoWolf wrote:Someone doesn't think exactly as he does so he FoS's him. That's kinda suspect.Exe wrote:Scum with Shadowolf. Lynch #2 found.
No, it's more about how themanhimself admitted that you were scummy, and understood your wagon, but chose to vote Elli instead. Essentially, diverting attention away from you (his potential scum buddy).
Nice try at a misrep though.
Looks like you were the one misrepping here.themanhimself wrote:QFT.ShadoWolf is acting fairly stupidly but I'm not sure it's scummy. My initial reaction was just confused newb but this game wasn't easy to get into, is he a Hydra under a new account or what's the deal there?
Then do it yourself, why are implying Exe should do it? It seems to be you're suspicious of everyone that's not 100% on board with the Shado wagon. Don't you think you're counting your chickens a bit prematurely? Then you answered something Shado addressed to Exe for Exe.Lady Lambdadelta wrote:True enough, but I think TwoHeadedBoy needs to be looked at aswell.
TwoHeadedBoy wrote:Then do it yourself, why are implying Exe should do it? It seems to be you're suspicious of everyone that's not 100% on board with the Shado wagon. Don't you think you're counting your chickens a bit prematurely? Then you answered something Shado addressed to Exe for Exe.Lady Lambdadelta wrote:True enough, but I think TwoHeadedBoy needs to be looked at aswell.
I'm feeling a Lady/Exe connection,she's playing off him too much for no valid reason.
There's also the fact that Exe called out themanhimself, who wasn't voting Shado, but not us. Instead, Lady calls us out for not staying on the Shado wagon. Interesting.TwoHeadedBoy wrote:Then do it yourself, why are implying Exe should do it? It seems to be you're suspicious of everyone that's not 100% on board with the Shado wagon. Don't you think you're counting your chickens a bit prematurely? Then you answered something Shado addressed to Exe for Exe.Lady Lambdadelta wrote:True enough, but I think TwoHeadedBoy needs to be looked at aswell.
I'm feeling a Lady/Exe connection, she's playing off him too much for no valid reason.
~Fugi
Not liking this "you don't have a case on me nyeh" attitude. I used to say this a lot as scum. I'll let Fugi address Lamb's other post, though.Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Also, I have a feeling that attack on me was more motivated by the fact that I called you on something, than you actually having a case on me.
Not pushing. I asked a simple question. I'm just curious of your read on Elli. That's all.Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Asking for an Elli opinion. Why do you want an opinion on Elli? I thought Shado wasn't scum fro his NL vote, and yet you continue to push Elli for his? Not gonna slide.
Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Also, directed at the bolded line: if you can find me one post that I have made that is a sheeping of Exe, I'll eat my (very decorated) hat.
I hope you enjoy hats.Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Exe wrote:
Scum with Shadowolf. Lynch #2 found.
True enough, but I think TwoHeadedBoy needs to be looked at aswell.
Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Here's a question for you: Why did you defend Shado with a "frustrated town" meta, and essentially play down his NL vote, only to ask us to take a look at Elli too?
Reads to me like you're saying "This person did it too! Why Shado? Why not Elli?"
A very thinly disguised passive defense, only veiled further by your push for an Exe lynch, where you state that, and I quote,EXE HAS NOT PROVIDED MUCH CONTENT.
So tell me, how am I "playing off" someone who according to you doesn't even have any content in their posts?
Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Here's a question for you: Why did you defend Shado with a "frustrated town" meta, and essentially play down his NL vote, only to ask us to take a look at Elli too?
Maybe he just wants your opinion on Elli, and why you're not voting them despite them placing the same vote I am.
Reads to me like you're saying "This person did it too! Why Shado? Why not Elli?"
I believe that's exactly what he's saying. I think you're missing his intentions, but that's just my opinion.
A very thinly disguised passive defense, only veiled further by your push for an Exe lynch, where you state that, and I quote, EXE HAS NOT PROVIDED MUCH CONTENT
So tell me, how am I "playing off" someone who according to you doesn't even have any content in their posts?
He has content. It just consists of "LYNCH SHADOSCUM IS HE DEAD YET" And that's fairly easy for you to play off, as you're showing.
P-Edit: Nice attempt at brushing Shado off to the side again. Asking for an Elli opinion. Why do you want an opinion on Elli? I thought Shado wasn't scum fro his NL vote, and yet you continue to push Elli for his? Not gonna slide.
If Shado flips scum, you're next.
I thought themanhimself was next?
My other head addressed the Exe part. Sorry, I forgot this. I see the reasoning for the Shado wagon, I understand Shado's reasoning in addition to the NL vote makes him scummy according to others, etc etc. I agree with my other head in that Shado is playing frustrated town.Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Here's a question for you: Why did you defend Shado with a "frustrated town" meta, and essentially play down his NL vote, only to ask us to take a look at Elli too?
Reads to me like you're saying "This person did it too! Why Shado? Why not Elli?"
You missed this section. Answer this.
TwoHeadedBoy wrote:Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Also, directed at the bolded line: if you can find me one post that I have made that is a sheeping of Exe, I'll eat my (very decorated) hat.I hope you enjoy hats.Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Exe wrote:
Scum with Shadowolf. Lynch #2 found.
True enough, but I think TwoHeadedBoy needs to be looked at aswell.
Also, I agree with my other head, that was a scummy response. Just because someone hasn't provided much content doesn't mean you can't play off them. Playing off someone has no relevance to content at all actually. So that's a null point. Then there's the fact that you say we're next if Shado flips scum. 1) planning lynches is scummy as shit. 2) this has a really OMGUS-y feel to it. You went from "should be looked into" to "you're next" in a matter of a few posts.
~Fugi