Mafiascum.net

We don't need a claim. #73 was basically a scumclaim anyways.

I wonder if edmund has a PR that stops him from responding to anything I say~

(0)
(0)
(0)
(3) - Katsuki, GreyICE, gandalf5166
(0)
(2) - Battousai, edmund.angles
(0)
(0)
(0)

(4) - Ellibereth, GhostWriter, AurorusVox, Amrun

The deadline is Sunday, September 18th 2011 at 4pm EST.
Prods will be issued tonight if necessary.

k I'm here
reading the almost nothing that's here
and why the fuck didn't I get an oversoul ragepm lolz

@AV: You haven't said anything directed at me. If you want more interaction with me this is a good place to start:

edmund wrote:@Everyone on my wagon:
What are your cases on me?

gandalf has claimed he hammered someone he suspected of being just a VI.

gandalf wrote:I just thought he was lolscum, was trying to put him under pressure to make sure he wasn't just being stupid.

gangalf's refuge in stupidity doesn't cut it.

===================[ ]

Edmund, you're really bad at this. Explain how I'm supposed to take the responsibility for hammering him when I thought I was putting him at L2.

Wasn't he going to claim at L-1?

Oh, I hope we get Irish Carbomb this time!

Edmund is prob town. If he was scum, he and/or his partners would try and put someone into the spotlight (I would have used someone who was acting like I have been). The fact that there hasn't been any type of discussion outside of edmund really tells me he is town.

Katsuki- What made over scummy? You never answered.

Onto scum... I still think gandalf's play (along with a couple others) has been scummy

1) First post into the game he voted Kats for the sole reason of following Grey. I feel scum would try and "follow the cop" early so would be more likely to think someone softclaiming a negative result on someone is telling the truth (if they are correct) and if wrong, finds it as an easy mislynch and hops on without question.

2) He also hammered town pretty quickly. He claimed he didn't know it was hammer vote, but I don't believe him, entirely. If I wanted to vote someone just to add pressure (ie, don't want them lynched but want them to think they are about to), I would check the votes. At the time of gandalf's vote, we were at the bottom of the second page. It would take anyone who was actually concerned by a lynch, approx 1-2 minutes to double check the vote count (especially if someone just voted them). The fact that he didn't, and he put a little lol as reason for the vote, makes me believe he wasn't concerned at all.

*FACEPALM*

I thought the lynch threshold was different D1, because I was thinking D1, 7 to lynch...... But we had 9 people alive, so 5 to lynch was normal. If you look back at my posts, the confusion is obvious. It really only just hit me. I thought there was some mindfuckery happening with the lynch thresholds.

↑ gandalf5166 wrote:

VOTE: Kats

↑ gandalf5166 wrote:

↑ edmund.angles wrote:VOTE: AuroroVox
-for being too paranoid about the rules.

Death reversal is probably a good bet with the theme and the fact that it would be kinda unfair if they didn't get to play. But I don't think there is much to be gained by discussing setup now. We can guess at the rules, but what is the point? - later we'll know.

THIS POST IS CLASS A HUMOR RIGHT HERE

↑ gandalf5166 wrote:

Unvote
VOTE: Oversoul

Lol.

Wrong button, meant to add:

Which of these shows confusion?

All the ones SINCE the hammer. Obviously I wouldn't be confused D1, because I didn't have anything to be confused about yet,

@Batt, really I think edmund's lack of presence since I hammered him shows he's scum trying not to slip up. If he was town he'd give us something to go on such as a last list of suspects or whatever.

Or he, like the mod, hasn't been online since getting hammered.

You don't think he's scum?

Nope. Battousai summed it up pretty well. There was no actual case on him strong enough to warrant him dying so quickly after a quick D1. Actually, there may not have been a case on him at all. People just seemed to take my initial D1 vote and run with it without bothering to ask why I did what I did and why I didn't vote him D2. So, with pretty much a complete lack of anything like a legitimate case worthy of causing such a fast ending to D2, any scum partners he'd have would have already stepped up to divert the lynch. It'd have been easy enough. Hell, bring up the lack of a case. Or the fact that the day was happening too quickly. Both are pro-town points, and would have saved him. There's no pro-scum point in quick lynching a partner like this. So no, I don't think he's scum. At all.

My case is his complete refusal to acknowledge me calling him scum.

Those are very compelling reasons he's town GhostWriter.

I do have a decent response.

LOLOBVSCUM

What happens when you sheep me?
What happens when you don't?

Wow, I thought the playerlist would be at least decent to play with... this game is cringe-worthy right now.

The following people are scum to me (or are playing shitty on purpose), not willing to bend on:

Aurorus
Grey
Kat

My vote no matter what is not leaving these three until they are dead.

Batt, you're telling me that edmund's complete lack of acknowledgement of my repeatedly calling him scum shows a pro-town mindset?

Are you high?

↑ edmund.angles wrote:
@Everyone on my wagon:
What are your cases on me?

↑ edmund.angles wrote:@AV: You haven't said anything directed at me. If you want more interaction with me this is a good place to start:

edmund wrote:@Everyone on my wagon:
What are your cases on me?

AV: I think you are scum.

Edmund: What is your case on me?

AV: Hammer!

AV: edmund is scum
AV: edmund is scum
AV: edmund is scum
edmund: AV you've said nothing directed at me
AV: /facepalm