↑FuDuzn wrote:What if scum has a GF to begin with though?
This. I'm under the assumption not all roles are from the draft.
Unvote
. As mentioned, Fu's paranoia and questioning are giving off town tells the more i look in depth.
Vote: drchrist
Child, please. You had the perfect opportunity to vote for mikehart here and you vote for drchrist? Whatsupwiththat?
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:22 am
by ObliviousDruidMuncher
Well I'll concede on this point.
Please do understand that I wasn't intentionally rolefishing. I was asking for information on already claimed roles so that I could see if the other 2 passive roles were drafted or automatically given to them because then I might have been suspicious of SpyreX for being the only one to "draft" a passive role. Lo siento.
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:54 am
by SpyreX
In what world is that not intentional?
Maaybe you didn't put two and two together but good lord
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 9:02 am
by ObliviousDruidMuncher
↑SpyreX wrote:In what world is that not intentional?
Maaybe you didn't put two and two together but good lord
Jesus, explain how that's a role fish in the least if the role is already claimed? I wasn't trying to find out anymore of their powers, just clarifying if it was their role role or if you are able to draft passive roles.
Please do understand that I wasn't intentionally rolefishing. I was asking for information on already claimed roles so that I could see if the other 2 passive roles were drafted or automatically given to them because then I might have been suspicious of SpyreX for being the only one to "draft" a passive role. Lo siento.
And this just signified why Im not moving my vote. You were rolefishing though and its almost as if you wanted more people to claim roles so you would have a better understanding of where there is so you can avoid it. And even then Spyre wasn't the only one as its been stated that drafted a "Passive" Role.
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 9:06 am
by SpyreX
↑SpyreX wrote:Actually while the language is backwards Fuz is absolutely right:
There is absolutely no reason to need to know if PGO is from Brickashaw Bumblebutts or part of the role.
Depending on wacky mechanics there may be negative reasons to know this, but no SWEET TOWN HELP YO for knowing that one way or the other.
Already done.
Because if the argument is "SPYREX IS MAKING UP GF" then go for it.
You'll notice I haven't said one way or the other anything about anything else because
at this juncture it is just bad
.
All this is done is make sure you never claim an inherent PR so wooo
Please do understand that I wasn't intentionally rolefishing. I was asking for information on already claimed roles so that I could see if the other 2 passive roles were drafted or automatically given to them because then I might have been suspicious of SpyreX for being the only one to "draft" a passive role. Lo siento.
And this just signified why Im not moving my vote. You were rolefishing though and its almost as if you wanted more people to claim roles so you would have a better understanding of where there is so you can avoid it. And even then Spyre wasn't the only one as its been stated that drafted a "Passive" Role.
Where did I even try to get more people to claim roles? That genuinely wasn't my goal at all and I did not see anywhere else stated that someone had drafted a Passive role.
SpyreX wrote:Because if the argument is "SPYREX IS MAKING UP GF" then go for it.
That was where my question was leading if no one else had drafted a passive role.
SpyreX wrote:All this is done is make sure you never claim an inherent PR
I think so. I PM'd the mod on clarification, but no reason to expound on this.
I'm going to try and make this as clear as possible (and for the record, the majority of the posts have been one head and we don't have a QT to discuss things, so I came up with the following myself):
My goal by finding if the miller claim and the PGO claim were abilities for the League member or the football player was to see if there were passive abilities among the football players. I didn't and still don't see the harm in a little clarification on an already claimed ability. Where I was going with it was, if they were just abilities for the League member, I was going to entertain the idea that SpyreX was just a mafia GF as a league member and was saying he drafted GF as almost a smokescreen for that. If his was the only passive ability from a football player, I would have been suspicious. I realize now that even a mafia GF would have no reason for such a gambit, but I've seen SpyreX's reckless but effective play (again, my partner would disagree with the latter) and was testing to see if I could catch him in a lie. If it appears I was rolefishing for more info, please clarify how this could have aided me in any way. I genuinely was not rolefishing.
The last part of the last post I posted was just stating that I was getting clarification from the mod on some of the abilities after rereading them.
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 2:37 pm
by SpyreX
What does that have to do with me saying: you've claimed you're not an inherent pr and you saying you asked for clarification on your own PM?
Also calling me reckless is hilllaaaririouuusss
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 2:51 pm
by ObliviousDruidMuncher
↑SpyreX wrote:What does that have to do with me saying: you've claimed you're not an inherent pr and you saying you asked for clarification on your own PM?
Also calling me reckless is hilllaaaririouuusss
Asked for clarification on a player who is apparently passive but so specific and the way it was written made it seem to me that it wasn't.
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 3:29 pm
by Nocmen
See, but how does it help town more than scum knowing that my ability was gained innately, or from the draft? It doesn't. It benefits the scum more. You seem to have a bit too specific thoughts about Spyrex and his intentions of the claim, it's definitely suspicious.
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 7:49 pm
by kdowns
@Mod, I am going to request replacement as I have had something come up that will prevent me from being able to concentrate on the game until May
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:58 am
by Debonair Danny DiPietro
↑SpyreX wrote:What does that have to do with me saying: you've claimed you're not an inherent pr and you saying you asked for clarification on your own PM?
Also calling me reckless is hilllaaaririouuusss
Child please, stop harrassing the idiot hydra for no real gain and help me gin up support for lynching mikehart. It'll be fun, promise.
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 8:40 am
by Elmo TeH AzN
↑ObliviousDruidMuncher wrote:Where did I even try to get more people to claim roles? That genuinely wasn't my goal at all and I did not see anywhere else stated that someone had drafted a Passive role.
Yes but still it seemed like you were trying to fish the roles out from the draft or people' actually roles. I mean I can claim that Im a BP SK and would you believe me?
↑SpyreX wrote:What does that have to do with me saying: you've claimed you're not an inherent pr and you saying you asked for clarification on your own PM?
Also calling me reckless is hilllaaaririouuusss
Child please, stop harrassing the idiot hydra for no real gain and help me gin up support for lynching mikehart. It'll be fun, promise.
Why the mikehart love again?
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:49 pm
by SpyreX
Well lets start with laying out a simple case for simple folks.
I'm voting him because of your stunning charisma and bloodlust, afterall.
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:51 pm
by Elmo TeH AzN
Good enough for me. VOTE: Mikehart Also wheres LLD?
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 1:08 pm
by ObliviousDruidMuncher
Anyone that still believes we were rolefishing: are you actually serious? At this point, we're going to have to agree to disagree. There are only so many ways we can explain it. We were not asking for information about roles that have not been claimed.