Page 4 of 57

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:57 am
by Benmage
Also I'm on my phone, so I can't respond to the things I'd like to. And fate lol, that can't be true and I got something funny to show you later when I get to a computer.

-ninjae

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:15 am
by MagnaofIllusion
Fate wrote:ohohoho?

More meta reads and can't even back it up with a vote?

BRING IT ON MOI

YOU SCARED OF SCUM?


Yeah, like I've ever been frightened of you Fate.

Want to go 1v1 again? I'll do that if you like.

Especially since you are doing nothing but fluffing but are able to pop up 5 minutes after my post to do this. Actively watching the thread but not posting scum-hunting? Why is that?

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:16 am
by jasonT1981
VC coming this evening.

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:31 am
by Fate
My vote is on scum=scumhunting

Yeah I'm fluff posting, is that all you can amount for a case on me?

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:41 am
by Pizzadudes7
Fate, did you admit to being scum in 74?

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:42 am
by MagnaofIllusion
Fate wrote:
Yeah I'm fluff posting, is that all you can amount for a case on me?


See this is a Fate scum-tell.

"Where's the case on me"

When have you ever given 2 shits about a case? Never. You are all about pretending that posting in all-caps repeatedly and throwing appealing to repitition is good scum-hunting.

But now it's "Where's the case on me"? Lulz.

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:44 am
by Yates
@Ben - I believe I answered this question:
Benmage wrote:Yates are you saying you saw MoIs vote as an rvs one and therefore not serious in its intent?
Here:
Yates wrote:This really isn't a scum tell and weakens your case. Plus,
it was RVS
. "For chuckles" is as valid a vote as anything else.


It goes from RVS to real in post 9 because:
MagnaofIllusion wrote:My vote moves from chuckle-vote to real now!


@iStark - This may be true:
iStark wrote:I've played couple of games with both Korlash and MoI, I know from experience they can turn anything into argument.
But THIS:
iStark wrote:I seriously don't have anything to comment on at the moment.
can not be possible. No reads on anyone? No comments on the MOI/Benmage/Fate discussion?? What is your opinion on the "scum slip?" Either of them???

@MOI - You can do better than this:
MagnaofIllusion wrote:This is not the posting of someone who honestly thinks I’m scum.

VOTE: Knox
That is straight up OMGUS voting. There is nothing scummy about wanting to extend day one for a bit to extract more information. This is
especially
true when a full HALF of the players have 5 or fewer posts and 4 have 2 or fewer. You would have been on anyone that put you at L-1 for putting you there two soon. You don't get to play both sides of the fence. This is the first time in the game I have started to think you actually may be scummy as opposed to your usual "charming" self.

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:45 am
by Yates
"too soon" - how did that end up "two soon?!!"

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:49 am
by MagnaofIllusion
Yates wrote:That is straight up OMGUS voting. There is nothing scummy about wanting to extend day one for a bit to extract more information. This is especially true when a full HALF of the players have 5 or fewer posts and 4 have 2 or fewer.
You would have been on anyone that put you at L-1 for putting you there two soon.
You don't get to play both sides of the fence. This is the first time in the game I have started to think you actually may be scummy as opposed to your usual "charming" self.


Um, no. Can you prove the bolded? Because it's a rather large stretch for you to assert you know what I would or would not do.

And I disagree completely with your assessment that it was a Pro-Town perspective post. Especially given that Knox didn't bother to focus on anything else until proded by Vijay about other suspects.

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:57 am
by Yates
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Can you prove the bolded?

Is this a serious question?

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:00 am
by MagnaofIllusion
Yates wrote:Is this a serious question?


Serious in that your assertion is unprovable and rather stupid, yes.

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:13 am
by Yates
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Serious in that your assertion is unprovable and rather stupid, yes.

So you would rather argue semantics than the general point. Is this what you are saying?

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:18 am
by Yates
You know what? I would hate to be seen as scummy for withholding my vote on you because:
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Why would you worry about a hammer-happy person coming along if you think I’m scum? That would be Pro-Town?

So I'll just go ahead and
unvote


Vote: MoI


You scum slipped, dude, and you are reaching for straws in a way that is not common for what I have seen of you.

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:23 am
by Yates
Voting for MoI:

vijay
pizza
ben
fate
pappums
Yates

That's 6. With 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch.

MoI is at L-1

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:36 am
by Benmage
Claim time

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:44 am
by Fate
I like seeing the cases scum make on me and tearing them apart. You never knew my meta, which is why I fooled you so hard in MSG

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:45 am
by Fate
Yates wrote:You know what? I would hate to be seen as scummy for withholding my vote on you because:
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Why would you worry about a hammer-happy person coming along if you think I’m scum? That would be Pro-Town?

So I'll just go ahead and
unvote


Vote: MoI


You scum slipped, dude, and you are reaching for straws in a way that is not common for what I have seen of you.


wait what the hell kinda post is this

are you his buddy o-O

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:46 am
by Fate
Pizzadudes7 wrote:Fate, did you admit to being scum in 74?


Yes.

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:11 am
by Yates
Fate wrote:are you his buddy o-O


Lol - touche.

I probably should have put this part: "I would hate to be seen as scummy for withholding my vote on you" in quotes. That is a tongue in cheek response to his assertion that it is scummy NOT to put someone at L-1 that you think is scummy. I didn't think he was scummy until this recent series of exchanges but he has done a fantastic job of convincing me otherwise.

Also - I'm here and active and ready to respond to him as soon as he posts.

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:18 am
by MagnaofIllusion
Yates wrote:So you would rather argue semantics than the general point. Is this what you are saying?


Of course not. Don’t be a moron. The whole point was that your premise was untenable. Here’s what you wrote

That is straight up OMGUS voting. There is nothing scummy about wanting to extend day one for a bit to extract more information. This is especially true when a full HALF of the players have 5 or fewer posts and 4 have 2 or fewer.
You would have been on anyone that put you at L-1 for putting you there two soon. You don't get to play both sides of the fence.
This is the first time in the game I have started to think you actually may be scummy as opposed to your usual "charming" self.


The bolded is the important point. Your premise is that I am playing ‘both sides of the fence’ based on what course of action you are stating I would have taken.

Yet you don’t know at all what course I would have taken. So your conclusion is wrong since your premise is wrong. That’s hardly ‘arguing semantics’ that’s clearly showing that your argument is stupid.

Honestly I’d say that your whole “It’s Pro-Town to give it a few days / Nevermind you called me stupid VOTE YOU / He’s at L-1” looks like complete scum posturing to get ‘Town cred’ but Fate’s post setting you up for lynch tomorrow means odds are slim you are scum with him. So you are probably just typical bad Town Yates.

--

Benmage wrote:Claim time


Lulz, no. I can’t wait for you to get to a computer to show me ‘stuff’ later though. I eagerly await your insight.

--

Fate wrote:wait what the hell kinda post is this

are you his buddy o-O


Hey look at this – it’s Fate-scum grooming his mislynch candidate for tomorrow.

Too bad you will not live long enough to get the chance to push it.

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:25 am
by Fate
Yup. Totally setting up two mislynches in a row by saying he's your buddy and then if you flip town he's scum anyway.

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:26 am
by Fate
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Too bad you will not live long enough to get the chance to push it.


Ohohohoh smells like a softclaim, let's hear it all! Don't stall now

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:28 am
by MagnaofIllusion
Fate wrote:Yup. Totally setting up two mislynches in a row by saying he's your buddy and then if you flip town he's scum anyway.


It's totally awesome that you admit up front exactly what you are doing. Cheers.

Why did you duck the 1v1 Fate? Chicken as usual?

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:35 am
by Fate
Nah, new habits. Last time Korlash, Ben, and you were in a game with me we 1v1d and I was dead wrong and ended up costing the game by not seeing through a scum gambit.

I'd prob 1v1 you tomorrow if your fakeclaim saves you today

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:40 am
by Yates
MagnaofIllusion wrote:That’s hardly ‘arguing semantics’ that’s clearly showing that your argument is stupid.

I disagree. I see your dodging the overarching point in favor of absolutely arguing semantics a scum tell of the highest order
for you
. You typically don't need to resort to that kind of nonsense. And yet, here we are.