Page 4 of 12

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 5:25 am
by RachMarie
PRs should be helping the town. Being an Innocent Child does not mean sitting back and being lazy because you know you won't be lynched cause you are conf town. It means getting your hands dirty and scumhunting, knowing you have a bigger responsibility to the town since you ARE conf town.

For example,. Gunny's play as IC in Open 397 was a tad erratic but he helped nail down T and P's fake claim as Tracker and helped get him vig shot. That combined with LS having a guilty on me as the one shot cop, got me lynched. Had town played better and Glow our remaining scum team member played worse, we would have lost that game for sure.

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 8:19 am
by mcqueen
VoteCount 1.2:


RachMarie (3) - andrew94, drmyshotgun, Om of the Nom
L-2

Om of the Nom (2) - Papi Bear, Voidedmafia
drmyshotgun (1) - RachMarie
Papi Bear (0) -
andrew94 (0) -
Voidedmafia (0) -
Chrimi (0) -
Ser Arthur Dayne (0) -

No Lynch (0) -

Not Voting (2) - Chrimi, Ser Arthur Dayne

With 8 alive, it takes 5 to lynch, and 4 to no lynch.

Deadline is on June 14, 2012 at 4:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time (EDT).


V/LA:


Ser Arthur Dayne - 1 to 2 days.

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 8:41 am
by drmyshotgun
RachMarie wrote:PRs should be helping the town. Being an Innocent Child does not mean sitting back and being lazy because you know you won't be lynched cause you are conf town. It means getting your hands dirty and scumhunting, knowing you have a bigger responsibility to the town since you ARE conf town.

For example,. Gunny's play as IC in Open 397 was a tad erratic but he helped nail down T and P's fake claim as Tracker and helped get him vig shot. That combined with LS having a guilty on me as the one shot cop, got me lynched. Had town played better and Glow our remaining scum team member played worse, we would have lost that game for sure.

Mmm, the situation is quite different on this one. We don't have extra PRs to prove someone's fake-claim, so in technological aspect Innocent Child cannot prove anything for us.
However, yeah, I agree they should be as productive as others.

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 8:50 am
by andrew94
unvote


voided, your entire focus is on papi atm.

Who is scum to you, and why is shotgun town?

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 8:52 am
by Voidedmafia
My focus is on Papi because HE NEEDS TO ANSWER THE QUESTION!

Secondly, I don't know yet.

Thirdly, why should be obvious, but in case you don't get it, it's because he's pressuring Papi, too.

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 10:27 am
by Ser Arthur Dayne
Voidedmafia wrote:My focus is on Papi because HE NEEDS TO ANSWER THE QUESTION!

Meh. Maybe he was just reaction fishing or just throwing random things in the air. What will answering the question actually accomplish for you?

Okay, so far:

Om is slightly townish for early scumhunting/getting the ball rolling with his Rach vote.
Voided is townish for the continual pushing on an IC.
Rach is slightly scummy for the vague/non-confrontational statment up there about ICs.
Shotgun is slightly scummy for the over-eagerness in the RVS/RQS and his jump behind Voided on Papi.
Chrimi is null.

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 11:41 am
by drmyshotgun
You say Voide's actions don't seem to be of any substance and is random and yet you say he is "Townish" for that?

What the hell can I achieve out of jumping behind Voided? Why is that scummy move?

You also just parroted my comment on Rach.

VOTE: Ser Arthur Dayne

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 3:10 pm
by andrew94
unvote vote Ser Arthur Dayne


shotgun, wanna join my voting block?

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 3:12 pm
by drmyshotgun
Who does it consist of? But yeah, sure.

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 7:02 pm
by Om of the Nom
You guys pre-emptively sheeped my place on the wagon :P
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Ser Arthur Dane
That post is so scummy, I'll give a more thorough explanation if I feel like it.

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 7:27 pm
by RachMarie
what?? wait a minute here answering the question would add more to the big picture which means more likely to nail scum. Can you further explain your reads too there SAD? (I just realized that your initials of your user name make a word).

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 7:32 pm
by Om of the Nom
Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Om is slightly townish for early scumhunting/getting the ball rolling with his Rach vote.
Why does this make me town?

Voided is townish for the continual pushing on an IC.
Why does this make him town?

Rach is slightly scummy for the vague/non-confrontational statment up there about ICs.
Why does this make her scum?

Shotgun is slightly scummy for the over-eagerness in the RVS/RQS and his jump behind Voided on Papi.
Why do these make him scum?

This is what I don't like about the post. There is reason, but no explanation.
Also yeah, answers to the bolded please.

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 8:01 pm
by Voidedmafia
- 2 things: 1, I'll know what the hell he was talking about. 2, more information, and more importantly, more
IC
information. As I've stated before, the two ICs
CANNOT be complacent
. Their opinions are the only ones we can 100% trust to be from town (even if they're useless), and the only other thing that's that trustworthy are flips.

So yeah, he needs to answer it.

- He did? He gave somewhat baseless excuses for Papi's actions, but I don't see anywhere where he said my pressure was without substance.

I do agree with the rest of this post, however.

Vote on SAD pending his response to me and .

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 8:41 pm
by drmyshotgun
Om of the Nom wrote:
Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Om is slightly townish for early scumhunting/getting the ball rolling with his Rach vote.
Why does this make me town?

Voided is townish for the continual pushing on an IC.
Why does this make him town?

Rach is slightly scummy for the vague/non-confrontational statment up there about ICs.
Why does this make her scum?

Shotgun is slightly scummy for the over-eagerness in the RVS/RQS and his jump behind Voided on Papi.
Why do these make him scum?

This is what I don't like about the post. There is reason, but no explanation.
Also yeah, answers to the bolded please.

More like there are statements without reasons OR explanations.

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 8:58 pm
by Voidedmafia
Gunny, I see reasons pretty clearly, so I'm not sure what you're not seeing.

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 9:25 pm
by Chrimi
So sorry guys, I can get on and actually play in about 6 hrs...

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 9:55 pm
by andrew94
voided, can you explain your post 87 second part about the post 81 things

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 10:19 pm
by Voidedmafia
What, exactly, do you want explained? I'm fairly sure I was clear-cut in what I meant.

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 10:20 pm
by Chrimi
NVM, I'm here.

VOTE: drmyshotgun
I like to vote someone as I read the thread.

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 10:22 pm
by drmyshotgun
Chrimi, you are scum here, ain't ya?

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 10:23 pm
by Chrimi
No, I'm potato here.

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 10:23 pm
by Chrimi
Shaddup OOTN the doctor, it's seriously annoying D:

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 10:23 pm
by drmyshotgun
That is certainly not Town?

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 10:24 pm
by Om of the Nom
Chrimi wrote:No, I'm potato here.
HEY!
THAT'S MY LINE!

Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 10:25 pm
by Voidedmafia
Too many injokes that I don't know about...

Though, I do hope you can explain that vote, Chrimi.