mcqueen unvotes his rvs vote with no additional info or anything
he says something that anyone can say
so
unvote vote mcqueen
WHO WANTS TO JOIN MY VOTING BLOCK
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 5:39 pm
by mcqueen
Anyone else understand why I say something very true, yet andrew94 changes it, says it's scummy, and votes me for it?
andrew94, scum don't keep everyone alive for mislynch bait. They keep me alive for it. My best games are when I have good endgames, and get away from mislynches, thereby screwing scum.
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 6:34 pm
by drmyshotgun
Whatever man. VOTE: mcqueen
Looks like a dumbass we got here. Hey, he might be scum too. But dumbass comes first.
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:13 pm
by Shattered Viewpoint
Alright, time to kick some ass.
Vote: andrew
Who's with me?
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:56 pm
by Phillammon
I'll admit I'm liking both of Andrew and McQueen as lynches. Leaning andrew, so VOTE: Andrew, but I could really go either way right now.
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 11:27 pm
by AcRv
↑mcqueen wrote:Well, throghout the day, I've thought of one thing to say - I've no need to arm myself unless I'm being called obvious town by a lot of players, as mafia will want me alive for mislynch bait, later in the game. So, yes I'm a PGO, and I'm not arming myself unless I'm being called obvious town.
Other than that, I'll unvote, as even my RVS vote isn't meaningful to me. UNVOTE:
The reason the plan was implemented last game was because if people say things just like that, then scum will go around killing players who aren't obvtown enough to activate their power. The advantage of everyone randomly doing it is that scum can't try to predict who's safe - because there's a 40% chance their target will shoot back, no matter who they are.
↑mcqueen wrote:andrew94 is just being andrew94. And McQueen is just being McQueen.
Guys, listen to the crazy man.
We don't want to lynch them now, we can use them as deadline lynches if we don't have any suspects - because they're both unreadable as all heck, and I didn't want to be the one to say it, but the thing is we don't lose a whole lot from having one of them lynched if they are town...
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:47 am
by Quinter
Vote: andrew
Last few posts have been fake. Dunno about Jal vs Acrv but they seem to be locked onto eachother.
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:54 am
by mcqueen
Oh, I made that post from a regular townie point of view, not from a PGO's. As far as I'm concerned, while I don't use my power, I'm just like a townie, anyway.
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 3:30 am
by brundibar
↑andrew94 wrote:mcqueen unvotes his rvs vote with no additional info or anything
he says something that anyone can say
so
unvote vote mcqueen
WHO WANTS TO JOIN MY VOTING BLOCK
unvote
FoS Andrew
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:34 am
by mcqueen
Also, andrew94, anyone can say anything, so there's always a chance I'll say something everyone can say, so why are you calling me out for it?
(Answer - He might be Indian, or just naive.)
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:20 am
by Lastsurvivor
The Florida Statehouse just became too depressing. One of the townsfolk decides to change it to a Presidential debate. Ah, Mitt Romney and Barack Obama. There's no way that could go wrong...
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:51 am
by drmyshotgun
Look at the more silent among us sheeping brainlessly at Andrew's direction.
Yep. We should really lynch Quinter. VOTE: Quinter
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:59 am
by mcqueen
andrew94 or Quinter? Hmm. Well, Quinter isn't going to be on his buddies wagon, and I know andrew94's meta is making ridiculous cases, so my decision should be obvious. I'll vote myself.
VOTE: mcqueen UNVOTE: VOTE: Quniter
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 11:02 am
by brundibar
↑drmyshotgun wrote:Look at the more silent among us sheeping brainlessly at Andrew's direction.
Yep. We should really lynch Quinter. VOTE: Quinter
Argh I can't believe I didn't even notice him doing the thing I voted him before right before I took my vote off him >.<
VOTE: Quinter
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 11:13 am
by Phillammon
Look, what are you accusing quinter of anyway?
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 11:22 am
by drmyshotgun
The question is, why are you defending him Phillammon? What excellent quality did you find of him that is worthy of getting your defense?
Quinter's 4 posts contain:
1. Hi, I'm V/La for 2 weeks. But I can still post. RVS. -
Means: "Hi, I'm not going to read much, won't get into much scumhunting, I'll still post though so don't replace me. RVS."
2. Hi there Kondi -
Means: Nothing really. Filler. Worthless piece of post.
3. thanks LS (mod). Vote: Shotgun. you didn't read your role PM?! -
Means: "I didn't read anything else but you saying that Shotgun. Although not enough, Imma vote you."
4. Vote: Andrew. Last few posts have been fake. Dunno about Jal vs AcRv but they seem to be locked onto eachother - Means: "Not even going to read any more. Andrew is popular wagon, so Imma get on it." +Fakecontent.
I ask this to Quinter. What exactly of Andrew's last few posts were "fake"? Fake of what?
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 11:24 am
by drmyshotgun
Quinter changed his vote three times, in his 4 posts. His posts are minimal and limited in its view of the game.
It is clear that he is not reading, and avoids acknowledging anybody.
So, Phill, why are you defending him?
I'm leaning Phill scum.
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 11:30 am
by Phillammon
I'm not defending, don't get me wrong. I just want to know what he is "doing" in brundibar's accusation, rather than not doing.
PEdit: Better. That's something. I still prefer andrew.
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 11:32 am
by drmyshotgun
Why?
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 11:36 am
by Phillammon
In his 6 posts, he has, like quinter, voted 3 times, and tried to call a personal army lynch (Post 80) without any decent explanation, and while being guilty of the exact same thing he accused mcqueen of, debatably.