Mafiascum.net

It'd help to state reasons if you want people to vote where you want them to.

↑ Majiffy wrote:It'd help to state reasons if you want people to vote where you want them to.

Sort of like you did?

By the way, you helping me lynch you doesn't help your case.

I'm not the one asking people to place votes.

Also, you haven't a case, so nothing I do can either help or hurt it.

VOTE: Hadmatter Oops

You have provided nothing but fluff so far, which is very anti-town imo, and have not asked or attempted to scumhunt in any of your posts, despite the fact we're already on page 4.

why are you sheeping Majiffy Babu?

It's not called sheeping, it's called following the flow-chart.

One vote is obviously not enough pressure to get him to contribute, as he continues to provide fluff.

It's totally sheeping. that flow chart has some inaccuracies.

Pedit:
and you have been contributing how exactly?

I've asked for info on why people are scum and aren't. I'm not asking for alot right off the bat, it's still early, but leave the fluff at RVS.

↑ Ms Marangal wrote:It's totally sheeping. that flow chart has some inaccuracies.

Now, now; lying is bad.

@HadMatter-please give a reason why you think Majiffy is "obvi-scum"

↑ Majiffy wrote:

↑ Ms Marangal wrote:It's totally sheeping. that flow chart has some inaccuracies.

Now, now; lying is bad.

LAL? I dare you to do it

↑ babushka wrote:@HadMatter-please give a reason why you think Majiffy is "obvi-scum"

why does it matter to you if matter has a reason to Majiffy being "OBV scum"?

The object of the game is to find the scum and lynch them. We find the scum by asking questions and applying pressure. Not sure what is hard to understand.

Policy lynches are only useful if you don't have any scum reads, Ms.

↑ babushka wrote:The object of the game is to find the scum and lynch them. We find the scum by asking questions and applying pressure. Not sure what is hard to understand.

hmm... Mk, though I don't think Matter is the right target

↑ Majiffy wrote:Policy lynches are only useful if you don't have any scum reads, Ms.

hmk, I'll as for them later. I don't think it'll be useful to know at this point

meanwhile, I wait for Sonic to come on and comment on what has happened so far.

Hadmatter, Jiffy is being jiffy so how is he obviously scum?

Babushka, what is the difference between your posting and Hadmatters?
Also give a reason other then fluff etc. as to why he is scum (note nearly everyone fills that bracket)

↑ Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:Korranth makes a bad vote in 22. So does HadMatter in 24. Sure Nero is annoying, we don’t lynch people for being annoying. JasonWazza’s might be the worst vote of them all in 34, is it an RVS vote? Is it serious, it’s not good either way. But then we get to this fun stuff...

OK so you list a bunch of people who did opportunistic voting and instead leave your vote on Ms M, why is that DDD?

Also it was part RVS part his a freaking annoying ass and i don't know if i can put up with more then 1 day of his shit.

↑ JasonWazza wrote:OK so you list a bunch of people who did opportunistic voting and instead leave your vote on Ms M, why is that DDD?

Because you might have noticed in the second part of that same post I start to poke at Nero to try to get some answers to some questions I have. I almost never unvote without revoting someone and I'm still waiting for Nero to respond so I can decide where I stand on him which will effect where the previously mentioned people stand.

Majiffy isn't actually obvi-scum but not explaning votes and trying to help me lynch them seems off. Everyone else seems happy since a meta is established, but meta doesn't make something right.

Deb/Ms what are your reads on each other?

I like Deb, but I'll reserve my reads for later

Why?

↑ HadMatter wrote:Majiffy isn't actually obvi-scum but not explaning votes and trying to help me lynch them seems off.

Good backpedaling. Really looks town.

Because I want my top targets to say stuff Matter, and because forming solid reads this early on isn't that entirely possible yet.