Mafiascum.net

How about reading the rest of that post.

I don't see how that's relevant to how I interpreted your post. You still agreed with it.

What do you think about Kcudz, Bacde?

No. I qualified it. I gave a two different scenarios, and, in a separate post, I agreed with one.

Affirmation is the same as agreement. This conversation has not changed my read on you.

Tbh, I don't care what your read on me is.
You're logic is fallible.
I did not affirm anything.

Now answer the question that was assigned to you.

You undeniably affirmed Uct's allegation when you quoted it and said, "this".

If the question you're referring to is AP's question, then I don't see the merit in answering it.

VOTE: Kcudz

Stop avoiding questions asked to you.

p-edit: Good, then my decision was a good one.

I guess you must think that the question he imposed on me was extremely relevant to reading my alignment.

Nope. There was no reason not to answer it.

↑ kcudz wrote:If the question you're referring to is AP's question, then I don't see the merit in answering it.

What do you have to lose by answering it?

Outting himself as scum, obviously Shisou.

The availability of the option by itself isn't grounds for justification for why I should answer it. If my answer is pertinent for people to get some kind of grasp on my alignment -- then sure. This isn't the case.

^scum.

Your attack on me seems contrived.

How about answer the question and let people interpret your answer and let them decide for themselves if it is indicative of your alignment or not.

^Town.

Because it would be unnecessary further speculation about someone's experience. I really don't see how that would contribute.

You're claiming to have experience that you claimed not to have.

kcudz isn't voting for scott when asked nicely... highly suspicious

thats my answer to your question AP

↑ AngryPidgeon wrote:Baboon is town because hes doing his own thing and clearly doesnt give a shit what people make of his post.

I've made 2 posts, one of which was a random vote. How does that entail me "not giving a shit?" I disagree btw, and I think you have a tendency to jump to conclusions.

↑ kcudz wrote:

↑ fuzzybutternut wrote:I can agree with Kcudz. Seems like newbscum.

This is not consistent with your prior claims of me *not* being a newb.

You're the one being ambiguous about the definition of "noob." And also, you are being hypocritical. If you can pass judgments on other players based off their apparent experience, then obviously your own experience would be pertinent information for other players, would it not?

↑ fuzzybutternut wrote:You're claiming to have experience that you claimed not to have.

This is false. 1) That was not the question that AP originally asked me, and 2) I never claimed not to have experience. I claimed I was a noob.

↑ baboon wrote:You're the one being ambiguous about the definition of "noob." And also, you are being hypocritical. If you can pass judgments on other players based off their apparent experience, then obviously your own experience would be pertinent information for other players, would it not?

I'm not being ambiguous about it. The word itself is a product of subjectivity. The latter part of your sentence does not fall into the context of AP's question.

↑ Bacde wrote:kcudz isn't voting for scott when asked nicely... highly suspicious

More like you telling other people how to vote is suspicious.