Mafiascum.net

In post 74, TheIrishPope wrote:I think only Maestro and Shana have not posted much...
What's up with that?

hmm

- f

TNE, how did you miss Emp's post #5 when you just posted a few posts later at #8?

In post 65, DoctorPepper wrote:Have Shana and Maestro forgotten about this game?

In post 74, TheIrishPope wrote:I think only Maestro and Shana have not posted much

In post 53, Aeris wrote:it's a weekend and mother's day weekend at that.

By 'have not posted much' do you mean <=2 posts?

Yes, precisely. I can't believe I fucking forgot mother's day weekend.

Because it was confirming stage.

I type /confirm and be on my way until the day started.

WAIT WHAT THE FUCK
Maestro has been posting on other threads literally right now
Everyone, vote for this sucker.

inb4 he still hates me >w>

In post 72, TheIrishPope wrote:

In post 52, Sugar Cain wrote:

Nero what are you doing? D:

I don't like either LAL Theory, both suck. I don't like policy lynches period and I think bringing it up is stupid

Proof that MM is voting for me because of this.

Do you see the bolded here? You really think that I'd fake talk to myself? Its obvious that Mara was talking to me.

+ look at the timing of this. You posted your questions about LAL in 42. I (Nero) posted 3 times and did not vote you.

Noeffenclue's vote on this is actually a lil' bit scummy since scum do this vote piggy backing all the time and it was an obvious false reason so it looks kinda lynch happy to vote without fact checking.

Yes, MM is voting for me. I understand that. I pointed it out.

In post 82, TheIrishPope wrote:Yes,

MM

is voting for me. I understand that. I pointed it out.

In post 57, Sugar Cain wrote:

In post 52, Sugar Cain wrote:Nero what are you doing? D:

I don't like either LAL Theory, both suck. I don't like policy lynches period and I think bringing it up is stupid

I can spout my game philosophy if I want.

vote:TIP

I am 100% sure that I am the author of this post and the fact the Mara didn't sign her post as Sugar like she's been doing is a dead should be a dead giveaway.

My apologies. So why are you voting for me?

In post 62, Sugar Cain wrote:I keep seeing you post elsewhere on the site but like half the players are ignoring this ame in favor of other. Our vots gonna sit on you tell I find something else to yell at.

That's why I was voting you but now I think I want to kill NEC so we'll see what Mara has to say.

Sugar Cain, why did you lie about our vote piggy backing?

- f

In post 85, Sugar Cain wrote:

In post 62, Sugar Cain wrote:I keep seeing you post elsewhere on the site but like half the players are ignoring this ame in favor of other. Our vots gonna sit on you tell I find something else to yell at.

That's why I was voting you but now I think I want to kill NEC so we'll see what Mara has to say.

"kill"ing is bad

-i

In post 86, NoEffenCllue wrote:Sugar Cain, why did you lie about our vote piggy backing?

- f

except that I didn't.

In post 88, Sugar Cain wrote:

In post 86, NoEffenCllue wrote:Sugar Cain, why did you lie about our vote piggy backing?

- f

except that I didn't.

How many votes are on you?

You used Pope's same false reasoning as a reason to vote us (yes, he didn't vote us but he was calling us a liar) and when his reasoning was proven false you kept your vote on us. I think any reasonable townie would admit to being in the wrong once the reasoning was disproven.

In post 90, Sugar Cain wrote:You used Pope's same false reasoning as a reason to vote us (yes, he didn't vote us but he was calling us a liar) and when his reasoning was proven false you kept your vote on us. I think any reasonable townie would admit to being in the wrong once the reasoning was disproven.

vote:NEC

Nope.

We have our own reasons for voting you. And I'm curious if anyone else sees what we're seeing. Hence the unsupported vote.

- f

In post 90, Sugar Cain wrote:You used Pope's same false reasoning as a reason to vote us (yes, he didn't vote us but he was calling us a liar) and when his reasoning was proven false you kept your vote on us. I think any reasonable townie would admit to being in the wrong once the reasoning was disproven.

vote:NEC

it is quite amusing how you claim to be able to read our collective mind and want to "kill" us for our yet unstated thoughts

-i

In post 92, NoEffenCllue wrote:

In post 90, Sugar Cain wrote:You used Pope's same false reasoning as a reason to vote us (yes, he didn't vote us but he was calling us a liar) and when his reasoning was proven false you kept your vote on us. I think any reasonable townie would admit to being in the wrong once the reasoning was disproven.

vote:NEC

it is quite amusing how you claim to be able to read our collective mind and want to "kill" us for our yet unstated thoughts

So now you're being cheeky and expecting me to read your minds. HAH!

In post 94, Sugar Cain wrote:

In post 92, NoEffenCllue wrote:

In post 90, Sugar Cain wrote:You used Pope's same false reasoning as a reason to vote us (yes, he didn't vote us but he was calling us a liar) and when his reasoning was proven false you kept your vote on us. I think any reasonable townie would admit to being in the wrong once the reasoning was disproven.

vote:NEC

it is quite amusing how you claim to be able to read our collective mind and want to "kill" us for our yet unstated thoughts

So now you're being cheeky and expecting me to read your minds. HAH!

you already claimed to have done so... Why stop now?

-i

Votes us with no reason given.
Nero guesses at reasoning.
"haha you're wrong."

By not giving a reason it allows for a lot of flexibility. By leaving a blank canvas it allows you to "agree" with anyone. Why are you afraid to commit to a reason?

NEC <---votes go there.

We are in no rush to build a case that will allow you to adjust your play to compensate
-i

In post 97, NoEffenCllue wrote:We have no case and are hoping others build one for us hence the blank canvas we left.
-i

FIFY!

In post 98, Sugar Cain wrote:

In post 97, NoEffenCllue wrote:We have no case and are hoping others build one for us hence the blank canvas we left.
-i

FIFY!

you can certainly hope so!

- f