Mafiascum.net

@HC: My vote was in response to the questionnaire, and to see how he reacted. I kept it there because he decided to vote me. Hopefully that clears up confusion.

@Feel It: you simply responded to his question about pitoli with another question. Answer the question.

In response to about the questionnaire?

In post 75, mnemonicdevice wrote:@HC: My vote was in response to the questionnaire, and to see how he reacted. I kept it there because he decided to vote me. Hopefully that clears up confusion.

@Feel It: you simply responded to his question about pitoli with another question. Answer the question.

What question?

In post 72, Toomai wrote:

In post 33, 2birds1stone wrote:Vote: Toomai

Scum trying to look like helpful townsperson, methinks.

I keep this stuff behind the curtains every game I do, and why would I make information more available as scum?

Unfortunately, you don't have any scum meta to back this up, so we would have to take you at your word that there are only town intentions for providing the chart.

EBWODP: At least no scum meta on this site.

In post 72, Toomai wrote:I keep this stuff behind the curtains every game I do, and

why would I make information more available as scum?

PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT

See that squiggly "?" symbol that some people have been placing after sentences? Oh, look, there's another one right there. Anyhoo, it's called a "question mark" and it's used to indicate that a question has been asked. When you see one of these "question marks", you should see if the question is directed towards you, and if so, answer it!

PUBLIC APOLOGY ANNOUNCEMENT

It appears that Toomai's question was directed at 2birds, not pitoli, and as such my sarcasm was excessive. Sorry 'bout that.

Man, what the hell was that even about?

I thought pitoli was ignoring a question, and I tend to get worked up over that sort of thing. Then I made my post and realized I was mistaken, as not only had pitoli NOT been asked the question, but if she HAD answered it I would have attacked her for answering a question intended for another player.

Hopefully that answers your question.

I'm reading Haschel as town or anal retentive scum.

In post 84, pitoli wrote:I'm reading Haschel as town or anal retentive scum.

And which side do you think is more likely?

In post 72, Toomai wrote:

In post 33, 2birds1stone wrote:Vote: Toomai

Scum trying to look like helpful townsperson, methinks.

I keep this stuff behind the curtains every game I do, and why would I make information more available as scum?

Because it's useless information. It's votes from an RVS which doesn't even count towards the game. To bring it up only serves to obfuscate the game with hypotheticals.

I'm also pretty pissed off that someone had to go and resurrect an RQS that was lost in rollback. Losing RQSes and the baggage that comes with them is a good thing for the game. The thread's now got plenty of noise regarding what the questions actually were and who said/thought what about them. This is not fucking helpful, and everyone contributing to it is gaining scumpoints.

Vote stays on Toomai for now, but not loving mnemonicdevice or Zhero either.

I guess Haschel's town. Sure, he had to go and bring RQS up, and I'm pissed off about that, but getting worked up about people not answering questions is kinda a townie trait.

In post 85, Feel It wrote:

In post 84, pitoli wrote:I'm reading Haschel as town or anal retentive scum.

And which side do you think is more likely?

The latter part of my statement was kind of a joke. I'm leaning town.

In post 86, 2birds1stone wrote: Vote stays on Toomai for now, but not loving mnemonicdevice or Zhero either.

Can you explain why?

In post 89, pitoli wrote:

In post 86, 2birds1stone wrote: Vote stays on Toomai for now, but not loving mnemonicdevice or Zhero either.

Can you explain why?

Vote stays for previous reasons.

I felt mnemonic and Zhero were the worst contributors of RQS noise.

In post 47, Haschel Cedricson wrote:

In post 45, mnemonicdevice wrote:Now the thing is, is that Zhero's response was deleted to my questionnaire, which was my main vote change reason. I also just wanted to see how he would react.

What specifically about his response caused the vote change?

I feel like this was an early attempt to get town away from rvs(and the questionare) by building a case on his vote and hopefully getting information from mnemoic undder bandwagon pressure.

In post 90, 2birds1stone wrote:

In post 89, pitoli wrote:

In post 86, 2birds1stone wrote: Vote stays on Toomai for now, but not loving mnemonicdevice or Zhero either.

Can you explain why?

Vote stays for previous reasons.

I felt mnemonic and Zhero were the worst contributors of RQS noise.

But Zhero didnt like the RQS either. Are you saying he was too noisy in objecting to RQS?

At the moment I'm leaning towards a Pitoli + MD scum team. Pitoli moreso. In 41 Pitoli dismisses Monkey's vote fairly quickly and seems to take it far too seriously, especially considering it was on page 2. The whole answering for MD isn't a scumtell as such, but Pitoli's response just doesn't work. In #49 she quickly agrees with Monkey on the fact it was only an observation, then dismisses it as a null tell. Also the latter part of #50 half condemns anyone who calls her out on the fact she answers another question for someone. Answering the question isn't scummy, but fact she felt the need to add the last part of #50 in starts to ping the scumdar.

Also I think the fact that Toomai posted the vote log is a null tell, and I'm not sure why 2birds feels the need to make a deal out of it.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Pitoli

In post 86, 2birds1stone wrote:I'm also pretty pissed off that someone had to go and resurrect an RQS that was lost in rollback. Losing RQSes and the baggage that comes with them is a good thing for the game. The thread's now got plenty of noise regarding what the questions actually were and who said/thought what about them. This is not fucking helpful, and everyone contributing to it is gaining scumpoints.

Eh, the only thing I care about RQS-wise is that initiating one is a scumtell. Other than that, the actual answers are meaningless.

Mostly my Zhero vote is an OMGUS, because he voted me.

Was me voting you scummy?

@Zhero: you voting me is not necessarily scummy. We are still in RVS/RQS stage, and so voting me without a good reason isn't a tell either way. How is initiating a RQS a scumtell?

@Feel It: Nevermind, you did answer the question.

@HC: your not doing a good job of convincing anyone that your town.

We are not still in the rvs rqs.

EBWOP: We were still in the RVS/RQS stage at that point

You have stage twice as an anagram and full word.