Page 4 of 66
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 2:05 pm
by EspeciallyTheLies
It doesn't have to be serious. But the fact that he completely avoided choosing anyone on the playerlist even for RVS is suspicious.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 3:13 pm
by BBmolla
VOTE: lucky
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 3:13 pm
by BBmolla
I actually thought the post was terrible too
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:01 pm
by Wake1
Yeah, I don't like this from you two. His first post wasn't serious, and was a playful poke at MS for its problems. I'd do the same. Your reason for voting him is nonexistent.having an unserious post isn't Scummy, and you know that, so what are you doing?
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:14 pm
by EspeciallyTheLies
Wake, you clearly do not understand what I said at all, or why I'm voting him. It is not for WHAT he said. It doesn't matter what he said. If he'd posted without voting, or voted the mod, or some other such irrelevant nonsense that
completely avoided interacting with anyone on the playerlist in any way
, I would still be voting him. Get it?
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:20 pm
by Wake1
That's a crap reason to vote him.
Both scum and Town can do what he did.
His act isn't inherantly Scummy.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:25 pm
by EspeciallyTheLies
Ok wake.
Do you have an alternative?
A better option?
Someone who did something scummier than that at this stage of the game?
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:26 pm
by EspeciallyTheLies
My reasoning is sound, whether you understand it or not.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:33 pm
by Wake1
Your reasoning is not sound, because you're voting him because you feel an unserious post is Scummy. It's not. I do that all the time as Scum. It's over.
As for who vote for, that's up to you. However, if you want me to be alright with it, there has to be a real reason for that person being Scummy.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:35 pm
by Wake1
*as Scum and Town.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:37 pm
by Does Bo Know
I get exactly where ETL is coming from. He's saying it's the scummiest possible thing he could find so far. So he's voting his top suspect so far.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:41 pm
by Wake1
It's still a crap reason.
If that's the best "reason" ETL can find, then we're either screwed or eveyone needs to start engaging more.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:46 pm
by Does Bo Know
It's a crap reason
Because there are no better reasons
Unless you can think of something? I can't.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:55 pm
by Wake1
There are at least 80 posts here.
A better reason than fluff must exist.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:58 pm
by Does Bo Know
I couldn't find something.
Find something and tell me about it
Or we're going to have a problem.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:02 pm
by Smudger
Hi. Going to be quiet until Sunday as I am in my weekend. Will try to read the thread if I get the time before then, I have briefly skimmed the thread.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:16 pm
by EspeciallyTheLies
You do know I don't give a shit if you're alright with my vote or not.... right? Because I'm alright with it, and since it's my vote, that's all that's necessary.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:36 pm
by Wake1
In post 91, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:
You do know I don't give a shit if you're alright with my vote or not.... right? Because I'm alright with it, and since it's my vote, that's all that's necessary.
If you truly didn't care, you wouldn't argue with me about it.
Do you normally find fluff suspicious?
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:57 pm
by EspeciallyTheLies
If you can't tell the difference between true fluff and avoidance fluff, then I don't know what to tell you.
I'm arguing with you because you are engaging me about it. Would you prefer I ignore you? Anyone else is free to chime in.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:08 pm
by Wake1
What makes you assume he's avoiding?
With all these crashes, I doubt that.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:53 pm
by EspeciallyTheLies
The fact that instead of voting someone on the player list, thus directly interacting with someone in the game, like others of us here have already done, Lucky2u decided to vote
the site
. That's what makes me assume he's avoiding
interacting with the playerlist
. I did explain this. At this point, it's extremely obvious that you do not understand. It's not just a matter of disagreeing; you legitimately do not understand what I'm saying. It's either that or you are purposefully playing this game of "But why?"
At least try to read my posts with the intention of learning where I'm coming from, instead of just being argumentative for the sake of being argumentative. I feel like this entire conversation with you has been unproductive and not about actually answering any questions you had but just to feed your need to be combative. It's becoming a distraction.
And I don't really appreciate it.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 8:54 pm
by BBmolla
Wake's town but he's probably going to disagree with everything I do so I'd be okay policy lynching him day 1.
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2013 1:04 am
by Lucky2u
finally caught up here. So there was a fake cop result gambit and ETL is voting me for a dumb reason. No body takes RVS seriously. It's a silly stage of the game and your voting me for doing it wrong? Allow me to correct that then.
Original Roll String: 1d13
1 13-Sided Dice: (12) = 12
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2013 1:05 am
by Lucky2u
VOTE: Aptil
Because the dice said so.
There, am I doing it right?
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2013 2:50 am
by anorway