In post 60, Cabd wrote:Lol. Look at the player list, SSK. Then tell me that if ffery and I tag teamed you, you wouldn't be an easy lynch.
Nope. I don't I would be. Go ahead and try though.
Pedit: SHH FFERY I RESPOND ONE AT A TIME. WAIT YOUR TURN
That was Orci.
Well, this is why you should sign.
Pedit:
Orcinus, why am I an easy lynch? Answer me that.
lynched d1 as bodyguard gg
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:51 pm
by Selkies
Also I now assume that you've conceded or dropped your original line of argument, which is that town have no reason to consider who's weak. Is this true?
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:52 pm
by Natirasha
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:52 pm
by Cabd
Yes because i'd never do it to taunt either of you.
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:52 pm
by Cabd
Oh hey a double voter. Not very often you see those.
Rabble rabble.
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:53 pm
by MafiaSSK
In post 76, Selkies wrote:Also I now assume that you've conceded or dropped your original line of argument, which is that town have no reason to consider who's weak. Is this true?
I haven't dropped it. I still fully believe it. You dropped it.
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:53 pm
by Selkies
In post 78, Cabd wrote:Yes because i'd never do it to taunt either of you.
In post 76, Selkies wrote:Also I now assume that you've conceded or dropped your original line of argument, which is that town have no reason to consider who's weak. Is this true?
I haven't dropped it. I still fully believe it. You dropped it.
So respond to it then, and not switch lines
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:54 pm
by MafiaSSK
In post 79, Cabd wrote:Oh hey a double voter. Not very often you see those.
In post 76, Selkies wrote:Also I now assume that you've conceded or dropped your original line of argument, which is that town have no reason to consider who's weak. Is this true?
I haven't dropped it. I still fully believe it. You dropped it.
In post 76, Selkies wrote:Also I now assume that you've conceded or dropped your original line of argument, which is that town have no reason to consider who's weak. Is this true?
I haven't dropped it. I still fully believe it. You dropped it.
So respond to it then, and not switch lines
You'll have to requote. I'm feeling lazy.
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:55 pm
by Selkies
And how the fuck did I drop it when I'm the one who bought it back up like you don't even make sense
Pedit@ssk: wooooooooosh see this is why i think you're a weak player
In post 76, Selkies wrote:Also I now assume that you've conceded or dropped your original line of argument, which is that town have no reason to consider who's weak. Is this true?
I haven't dropped it. I still fully believe it. You dropped it.
In post 78, Cabd wrote:Yes because i'd never do it to taunt either of you.
Nice recover, but I'm not buying it.
You're welcome to buy lead instead.
P-edit: I think SSK has hit more posts in this game than in msot of his completed games already.
Yeah, I'm not lurking in this game. Well, I mean, if you mean the 8 or so hours I sleep, then that could be considered lurking, but this game, no lurking otherwise.
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:59 pm
by MafiaSSK
In post 95, Cabd wrote:I know, maybe he should make a huge case justifying his vote on you. Oh, wait, I'm his scumbud so I'll do it, hang on.
How do you not understand this Cabd? EVERY vote needs reasoning.