Mafiascum.net

VOTE: Doc for scummy reasoning and agreeing with CDB when there was no reason to.

In post 53, undo wrote:Aegor, you said you had voted Freak because he was "trying too hard", and you claimed it to be a "real-ish" vote. What exactly did you mean by "trying too hard"?

Precisely what I said when you asked me this on the first page.

Was it really a serious vote, or were you still imbued with the spirit of random voting?

It was real-ish.

Can you please elaborate on this preferrably without audiovisual aids?

No, because the answers will be unproductive and uninteresting.

Can you also provide actual reasons for voting Doc and thinking CDB is "probably scum"?

A bad, unsubstantiated vote on Jordan that goes nowhere and an attempt to buddy CDB even though CDB himself probably agrees that his post attacking me (which I hope is a rxn test) was a steaming pile of poopy.

While we’re at it, can you please provide reasoning on your posts henceforth?

I do what I want.

Oh, and ~Jordan`, please keep those post-by-post comments to yourself. Your synthesis is interesting enough, but empty laconisms like "?" "and…?" "and…?" "The hell?" "The hell??" are not helpful.

Please stop being annoying and demanding.

In post 54, absta101 wrote:Do you think Doc and CDB are scum together? Explain this.
Also, stop using percentages as if they mean anything.

1) Thoughts for the moment.
2) >50% means something very clear: an event is more likely to occur than not to occur.



Could someone please explain why JK's vote is so bad? Not really getting bad vibes from it but am open to changing my mind.

In post 75, Aegor wrote:

In post 53, undo wrote:Aegor, you said you had voted Freak because he was "trying too hard", and you claimed it to be a "real-ish" vote. What exactly did you mean by "trying too hard"?

Precisely what I said when you asked me this on the first page.

Was it really a serious vote, or were you still imbued with the spirit of random voting?

It was real-ish.

Can you please elaborate on this preferrably without audiovisual aids?

No, because the answers will be unproductive and uninteresting.

Thank you for giving yourself the trouble of going through my questions without providing a clear answer.

Can you also provide actual reasons for voting Doc and thinking CDB is "probably scum"?

A bad, unsubstantiated vote on Jordan that goes nowhere and an attempt to buddy CDB even though CDB himself probably agrees that his post attacking me (which I hope is a rxn test) was a steaming pile of poopy.

Thank you for an actual answer.

While we’re at it, can you please provide reasoning on your posts henceforth?

I do what I want.

Can't argue with that. *shrugs*

Oh, and ~Jordan`, please keep those post-by-post comments to yourself. Your synthesis is interesting enough, but empty laconisms like "?" "and…?" "and…?" "The hell?" "The hell??" are not helpful.

Please stop being annoying and demanding.

Wow, really?

I wouldn't have posted it if I thought it was "poopy", Aegor. I think they're legitimate questions. I have simply concluded that your response to them is suggestive of you being town.

In post 75, Aegor wrote:VOTE: Doc for scummy reasoning and agreeing with CDB when there was no reason to.

You're aware that waiting a couple of pages to say "Oh my god! You suck!" doesn't make it less scummy, right? You're also committing the same scummy sin that CDB initially called you out for - seeing something, going on about something else, then going back and saying "You know what, my vote should be , even though I didn't think it warranted it right away." That kind of calculated sophistry does not scream Town.

To the people that have been saying I have bad reasoning, or haven't explained, or whatever else, fuck you. I explained well my solid reads perfectly well. Jordan is scummy for trying to build cases on people out of thin air, early nervous votehopping, and bad reactions to being voted, CDB is probably Town for demonstrating a logical, discerning thought process, and Aegor is getting scummier for cognitive dissonance. Everyone else is too weak a read to bother with.

Doc. Just stop with the !!!! and answer the questions asked of you.

@undo

In post 57, ~Jordan` wrote:

Oh, and ~Jordan`, please keep those post-by-post comments to yourself. Your synthesis is interesting enough, but empty laconisms like "?" "and…?" "and…?" "The hell?" "The hell??" are not helpful.

Maybe i wasn't clear about what these "empty laconisms" meant. When I read your posts, I get confused. I express this confusion so that maybe you'll clear it up later by answering my questions. For example, "why don't you vote for the people you find suspicious, undo?" "why are you avoiding taking any positions on anything, undo?"

In post 79, ~Jordan` wrote:Doc. Just stop with the !!!! and answer the questions asked of you.

I actually did.

Please stop with the empty laconisms. No one, and I mean has any earthly fucking clue what you mean by "!!!!"

If you don't like my reasoning or my criticisms of you, engage them or prove me wrong. But reacting to every comment aimed your way with the anime-equivalent of "That's bullshit!" is counter-productive and fills the thread with your inane garbage posts.

no, you didn't :/

I don't really need to engage with anything you say unless it's scummy or crosses the threshold of competence. :/

Jordan is going to try me all game.

;D

Nat didn't answer my questions yet either.

You had questions?

yeah

Oh.

there you go again

In post 78, Doc Holliday wrote:

In post 75, Aegor wrote:VOTE: Doc for scummy reasoning and agreeing with CDB when there was no reason to.

You're aware that waiting a couple of pages to say "Oh my god! You suck!" doesn't make it less scummy, right? You're also committing

exactly

the same scummy sin that CDB initially called you out for - seeing something, going on about something else, then going back and saying "You know what, my vote should be

here

, even though I didn't think it warranted it right away." That kind of calculated sophistry does not scream Town.

To the people that have been saying I have bad reasoning, or haven't explained, or whatever else, fuck you. I explained well my solid reads perfectly well. Jordan is scummy for trying to build cases on people out of thin air, early nervous votehopping, and

really

bad reactions to being voted, CDB is probably Town for demonstrating a logical, discerning thought process, and Aegor is getting scummier for cognitive dissonance. Everyone else is too weak a read to bother with.

Doc Holliday. Can you please explain to me what seems "effortful" about CDB's post. Where is the cognitive dissonance he mentioned located?

In post 0, xRECKONERx wrote:

3b) Voting Formatting:

We are beta testing an automatic vote counter this game... this means that we have to adhere to strict formatting.

Put a colon (:) after the word "Vote".

The vote counter will miss it if you don't. Also,

use full usernames

or at least something very close. The vote counter will attempt to match an attempted vote with a playername and find the closest match, but if it's too far off, it won't count it.

happy scumday, etc

I am late to the party, but, I have arrived now!

VOTE: Doc Holliday

what do you think about everyone else?

In post 77, ChannelDelibird wrote:I wouldn't have posted it if I thought it was "poopy", Aegor. I think they're legitimate questions. I have simply concluded that your response to them is suggestive of you being town.

k. I want it on the record that I thought they were silly questions, but I guess they helped you in some way, so I should not judge.

In post 78, Doc Holliday wrote:You're aware that waiting a couple of pages to say "Oh my god! You suck!" doesn't make it less scummy, right? You're also committing

exactly

the same scummy sin that CDB initially called you out for - seeing something, going on about something else, then going back and saying "You know what, my vote should be

here

, even though I didn't think it warranted it right away." That kind of calculated sophistry does not scream Town.

What are you even talking about? I voted you in 47. Or are you talking about something else entirely?

CDB is probably Town for demonstrating a logical, discerning thought process

and Aegor is getting scummier for cognitive dissonance.

Which has manifested itself how, exactly?

In post 75, Aegor wrote:VOTE: Doc for scummy reasoning and agreeing with CDB when there was no reason to.

What's the point of voting him here then, seriously?

I forgot I was voting him. It was right before beddy-bye.