Mafiascum.net

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:

↑ farside22 wrote:

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:farside, how many scum have you got with random, completely unqualified and unexplained votes?

My vote is not random or a shock I would say.

But please keep asking pointless questions that give you no alignment info.

It's not pointless - you still haven't explained why you are voting for me. Why are you trying to avoid explaining the vote?

I'm sorry I didn't know you were the only person aloud to ignore questions directed at you and bypass them.

I said I didn't understand what you were asking. Your question at the top of the last page does not follow any known human language syntax.

I then explained I was trying to get the first couple pages sussed out by asking questions. What isn't answered?

54 was in the 30 sec I was dead in a lol game, ftr. Otherwise, yup.

Has little to do with logic, all with playing a game!

Farside, If you were town you should welcome the opportunity to explain scumreads or perceived motives - not just ignore the chance to reason out a possible wagon as a gotcha for a point that is irrelevant.

Anatole Kuragin wrote:Farside, If you were town you should welcome the opportunity to explain scumreads or perceived motives - not just ignore the chance to reason out a possible wagon as a gotcha for a point that is irrelevant.

Did I say I was ignoring anything?
Nope.
Said I'd get to it when I got home.
Why is that an issue for you to wait?

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:I said I didn't understand what you were asking. Your question at the top of the last page does not follow any known human language syntax.

I then explained I was trying to get the first couple pages sussed out by asking questions. What isn't answered?

What is the point of asking ki about something he never claimed was something he found scummy?
If I need to requote his issues with Matt one more time to be clear you can literally kiss my ass.

I saw his post about Matt earlier, and asked if he thought the way Matt (who he was and is voting) would be likely to vote in such a bold way (no other text, or explanation) as the second vote on a wagon if he was scum. I asked this because I think that reduces the chances of it being a scum vote. Ki-Gi even said himself he didn't think it would be likely when addressing the question in a more general manner.

That has nothing to do with what you're arguing.

I just find it weird that you're willing to drop an apparently serious vote with intention to make a case later, rather than the logical order of making a case first.

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:I saw his post about Matt earlier, and asked if he thought Matt (who he was and is voting) would be likely to vote in such a bold way (no other text, or explanation) as the second vote on a wagon if he was scum. I asked this because I think that reduces the chances of it being a scum vote. Ki-Gi even said himself he didn't think it would be likely when addressing the question in a more general manner.

That has nothing to do with what you're arguing.

EBWOP that first sentence for coherence.

Oh and for a shit and giggle reference I did vote for messiah in Bel's game for no reason and he was scum.

↑ farside22 wrote:Oh and for a shit and giggle reference I did vote for messiah in Bel's game for no reason and he was scum.

What is the point of this. What. Why. Because it seems like an underhanded way to justify your random vote while still making it clear that you don't actually mean anything by it.

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:I saw his post about Matt earlier, and asked if he thought the way Matt (who he was and is voting) would be likely to vote in such a bold way (no other text, or explanation) as the second vote on a wagon if he was scum. I asked this because I think that reduces the chances of it being a scum vote. Ki-Gi even said himself he didn't think it would be likely when addressing the question in a more general manner.

That has nothing to do with what you're arguing.

You realize your question did not refer to Matt right?

He also stated it wasn't a big scum tell, also not sure why your up in arms over my vote with explanation while questioning ki for his vote with the rational of being a second vote without a reason.

What is the difference between the first vote for no reason push?

↑ Ki-Gi wrote:

↑ farside22 wrote:Oh and for a shit and giggle reference I did vote for messiah in Bel's game for no reason and he was scum.

What is the point of this. What. Why. Because it seems like an underhanded way to justify your random vote while still making it clear that you don't actually mean anything by it.

Anatole asked me about my vote in previous games.

His question could have referred to two different people, it was a simple misunderstanding.

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:farside, how many scum have you got with random, completely unqualified and unexplained votes?

This question^

It was the first one I thought of because it was recent

I'm busy right now but I've been keeping an eye on the thread and I think you're wasting time and harming town with your vindictive tone towards farside, Anatole. Maybe this is a time for self reflection and a drop of humility, even if she is being aggressive towards you

↑ farside22 wrote:

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:I saw his post about Matt earlier, and asked if he thought the way Matt (who he was and is voting) would be likely to vote in such a bold way (no other text, or explanation) as the second vote on a wagon if he was scum. I asked this because I think that reduces the chances of it being a scum vote. Ki-Gi even said himself he didn't think it would be likely when addressing the question in a more general manner.

That has nothing to do with what you're arguing.

You realize your question did not refer to Matt right?

He also stated it wasn't a big scum tell, also not sure why your up in arms over my vote with explanation while questioning ki for his vote with the rational of being a second vote without a reason.

What is the difference between the first vote for no reason push?

Your vote still has no explanation at all.

And yes, I was asking a question to Ki-Gi in reference to Matt originally. I think I would know better than you. Ki-gi seemed to understand the question fine when I asked it - you are the only one who did not.

↑ MattP wrote:I'm busy right now but I've been keeping an eye on the thread and I think you're wasting time and harming town with your vindictive tone towards farside, Anatole. Maybe this is a time for self reflection and a drop of humility, even if she is being aggressive towards you

Why shouldn't I question her voting without explanation?

↑ MattP wrote:I'm busy right now but I've been keeping an eye on the thread and I think you're wasting time and harming town with your vindictive tone towards farside, Anatole. Maybe this is a time for self reflection and a drop of humility, even if she is being aggressive towards you

Are you my fucking life coach dude? Am I getting charged for this?

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:

↑ farside22 wrote:

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:I saw his post about Matt earlier, and asked if he thought the way Matt (who he was and is voting) would be likely to vote in such a bold way (no other text, or explanation) as the second vote on a wagon if he was scum. I asked this because I think that reduces the chances of it being a scum vote. Ki-Gi even said himself he didn't think it would be likely when addressing the question in a more general manner.

That has nothing to do with what you're arguing.

You realize your question did not refer to Matt right?

He also stated it wasn't a big scum tell, also not sure why your up in arms over my vote with explanation while questioning ki for his vote with the rational of being a second vote without a reason.

What is the difference between the first vote for no reason push?

Your vote still has no explanation at all.

And yes, I was asking a question to Ki-Gi in reference to Matt originally. I think I would know better than you. Ki-gi seemed to understand the question fine when I asked it - you are the only one who did not.

That's not true, I thought you were referring to Flubber when you were referring to Matt, which made me answer yes as opposed to no.

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:

↑ MattP wrote:I'm busy right now but I've been keeping an eye on the thread and I think you're wasting time and harming town with your vindictive tone towards farside, Anatole. Maybe this is a time for self reflection and a drop of humility, even if she is being aggressive towards you

Why shouldn't I question her voting without explanation?

When I read through your posts regardless of content they came off as vindictive. I care much less about what you are doing in your posts. Do you currently believe that farside is even scummy?

↑ Ki-Gi wrote:

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:

↑ farside22 wrote:

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:I saw his post about Matt earlier, and asked if he thought the way Matt (who he was and is voting) would be likely to vote in such a bold way (no other text, or explanation) as the second vote on a wagon if he was scum. I asked this because I think that reduces the chances of it being a scum vote. Ki-Gi even said himself he didn't think it would be likely when addressing the question in a more general manner.

That has nothing to do with what you're arguing.

You realize your question did not refer to Matt right?

He also stated it wasn't a big scum tell, also not sure why your up in arms over my vote with explanation while questioning ki for his vote with the rational of being a second vote without a reason.

What is the difference between the first vote for no reason push?

Your vote still has no explanation at all.

And yes, I was asking a question to Ki-Gi in reference to Matt originally. I think I would know better than you. Ki-gi seemed to understand the question fine when I asked it - you are the only one who did not.

That's not true, I thought you were referring to Flubber when you were referring to Matt, which made me answer yes as opposed to no.

Your answer shows to me what you would think of the situation without confbias, do you disagree?

↑ MattP wrote:I'm busy right now but I've been keeping an eye on the thread and I think you're wasting time and harming town with your vindictive tone towards farside, Anatole. Maybe this is a time for self reflection and a drop of humility, even if she is being aggressive towards you

Oh Anatole seems scum to me. His why vote without a reason, but saw nothing scummy from you doing it and those question. Pfft. Something with those questions should have provided insight from those he asked, but instead there is confusion because of how he asked his questions.

I'll explain better when I get home.

↑ MattP wrote:

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:

↑ MattP wrote:I'm busy right now but I've been keeping an eye on the thread and I think you're wasting time and harming town with your vindictive tone towards farside, Anatole. Maybe this is a time for self reflection and a drop of humility, even if she is being aggressive towards you

Why shouldn't I question her voting without explanation?

When I read through your posts regardless of content they came off as vindictive. I care much less about what you are doing in your posts. Do you currently believe that farside is even scummy?

Pursuing a case without any reasoning at all, discouraging questioning players and their motives are the scummiest traits that have been displayed so far. I'm trying to let her explain why she's playing like this before I make up my mind.

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:

↑ Ki-Gi wrote:

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:

↑ farside22 wrote:

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:I saw his post about Matt earlier, and asked if he thought the way Matt (who he was and is voting) would be likely to vote in such a bold way (no other text, or explanation) as the second vote on a wagon if he was scum. I asked this because I think that reduces the chances of it being a scum vote. Ki-Gi even said himself he didn't think it would be likely when addressing the question in a more general manner.

That has nothing to do with what you're arguing.

You realize your question did not refer to Matt right?

He also stated it wasn't a big scum tell, also not sure why your up in arms over my vote with explanation while questioning ki for his vote with the rational of being a second vote without a reason.

What is the difference between the first vote for no reason push?

Your vote still has no explanation at all.

And yes, I was asking a question to Ki-Gi in reference to Matt originally. I think I would know better than you. Ki-gi seemed to understand the question fine when I asked it - you are the only one who did not.

That's not true, I thought you were referring to Flubber when you were referring to Matt, which made me answer yes as opposed to no.

Your answer shows to me what you would think of the situation without confbias, do you disagree?

Scum post ^

↑ farside22 wrote:

↑ MattP wrote:I'm busy right now but I've been keeping an eye on the thread and I think you're wasting time and harming town with your vindictive tone towards farside, Anatole. Maybe this is a time for self reflection and a drop of humility, even if she is being aggressive towards you

Oh Anatole seems scum to me. His why vote without a reason, but saw nothing scummy from you doing it and those question. Pfft. Something with those questions should have provided insight from those he asked, but instead there is confusion because of how he asked his questions.

I'll explain better when I get home.

Do you realize that some votes are meant to be taken seriously and some are basically bullshit votes? Matt explained his was the latter. Your vote is obviously earnest. Do you seriously not see the difference?