Sorry, I read that as "a few", not "few". Big difference.Guardian wrote:I am still highly unconvinced of Sarc scum or CTD town.
ABR indeed needs independent thinking.
---
MoS's post deserved a reply:
I said few should be ignored all together. That doesn't mean that I've seen any that should be ignored all together. IMastermind of Sin wrote:But you agreed with them.Guardian wrote:I haven't seen any in this game, nor can I think of any -- Coron and VitaminR seemed to imply that some posts were like this, no?Mastermind of Sin wrote:What types of posts do you believe should be ignored altogether?Guardian wrote:
I think I agree with Vitr and Coron that not all posts are worth quoting, but few should be ignored all together.didn'tagree with them.
Why is ABR on your category, but I'm "scummy"? He's as guilty of lacking content and making short posts, meaningless posts as I am, if not more. At least most of my posts say something useful.Wrong. Dead wrong. There is no statistical probability that makes you more likely to be town than anyone else in the game. Just because you get mislynched as town in other games does not make you more likely to be town in this one. You *should* get lynched more as town than as scum, if you're getting lynched, because the statistics are in favor of all of us being town instead of scum. You are not special, you do not get a coupon that lets you have better odds at being town than the rest of us. Your argument is appealing to emotion, crap logic, and complete bullshit.Yes it is. I always get mislynched, and have been lynched only once as scum. Lynching me almost never results in a pro-town achievement.Mastermind of Sin wrote:Asking us to not lynch you because you always get mislynched is *not* a logical metagame.Is this true, anyone, from your experience with MoS? He is asking us to positively metagame him (as I am asking everyone to positively metagame me ) -- I would love knowing if there is substance behind this.MoS wrote:Make of it what you will. All this proves is that you don't know how I operate.A good part of me really thinks it is faked.
Not only that, I am pretty good at finding scum, if terrible at convincing others. So not only do you lose a pro-town player, you lose a scum hunter as well.
Lynching me = anti-town.
I found Rishi a bit off for this, but I was happy I didn't point it out... since VitaminR agreed with it.VitaminR wrote:I very much like Rishi's last post and this observation:
It seems horribly inconsistent from Guardian's side.Rishi wrote:I don't like how Guardian lists his top suspects as CTD and Xdammo, but is keeping his vote on Sarcastro. Playing both sides of the fence?
I'm pretty pleased with my Guardian vote, although I could go for a Sarc lynch as well.
I am voting for CTD, right now, not Sarcastro.
VitaminR agreeing with a completely factually incorrect reason to find me scummy screams of opportunism to me. I think he is buddying to Rishi.
Of Pooky's list, I think that I and Coron are town, and Pooky is scum with VitaminR. No, I don't intend to justify why Pooky is scum, but I equally don't intend to pursue him instead of VitaminR today, I think.
VitaminR's actions in agreeing with Rishi's completely incorrect statement is highly suspicous to me.
unvote: CTD vote: VitaminR
---
For my reference:
Xdaamno - scummy??
Mastermind of Sin - scummy?
CrashTextDummie - scummy?
Rishi - town?
PookyTheMagicalBear - scum?
VitaminR - scum
Coron - town
Sarcastro - town
Guardian - town
Albert B. Rampage -
trumpezia - town??
I have no reason to believe he is town, and I am not going to contribute to the stalling that people are causing under the pretense of waiting for enough posts to pass so that they are not "spamming". That's a bullshit excuse that the mafia have used to consume nearly 1/3 of our game time.
Sarcastro (5): CTD, Albert, VitaminR, Rishi, MoS
Albert (2): Pooky, Coron
CTD (1): Sarcastro
trumpezia (1): Xdaamno
VitaminR: (1) Guardian
11 living, 6 to lynch