Mafiascum.net

↑ Passionate Storm wrote:Actually, AJ is RVS, Aneninen is serious vote.

Jeanne, sign please. I know I am bad too.

~Titus

Okay.

- Jeanne

Sorry. How I see it, town should be acting town to others along with scumhunting. Do you think that town should actively point out the town things that they are doing to accomplish this goal?

↑ Errantparabola wrote:

↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:I'm waiting. It will come. Patience. Which is more provocative, a vote, or none? Based on your reaction, I must say that the latter seems more true.

This is you trying to imply that you're purposely not voting in order to gauge reactions by people noting that you're not voting. I don't buy that.

You, my friend, are quite silly. I have gotten more questions and posts about my lack of vote than anyone else has gotten about their vote. The facts are on my side.

But since you seem so insistent that my intentional lack of vote is so suspicious because it creates no reads, perhaps you would like to explain why every post of yours is focused on my lack of vote and not any of the other interesting, provocative votes that have been flying around?

Do, please, explain, why none of your posts have been about anything but my lack of vote with the small exception of that comment at the end of your last post.

↑ Passionate Storm wrote:

↑ Spider Gwen wrote:So what's the beef with AJ? Because it has to be something big to sideline a serious suspect.

You changed the words. I had a gut suspicion. Jeanne chimed in with hers. Jeanne specifically said it was the other head.

It was more serious than RVS. That was my point. I just found it suspect that you pursued that instead of a non-random suspect. That's not what I expect from a town Titus. But I can see scum Titus being very cautious and feeling things out. An Anen vote doesn't change that.

hello people

Hello to you too

↑ Errantparabola wrote:Sorry. How I see it, town should be acting town to others along with scumhunting. Do you think that town should actively point out the town things that they are doing to accomplish this goal?

Town should focus exclusively on solving the puzzle, not on appearing town unless asked a questioned or wagoned imo. Why the theory focus?

~Titus

Eagle-

1) For clarification, are you actively claiming to be purposely withholding a vote in order to gauge reactions from people that notice it?
2) In response to your question, I post what I think I can bring to the table. If something has already been said, no need to say it again.

↑ Spider Gwen wrote:

↑ Passionate Storm wrote:

↑ Spider Gwen wrote:So what's the beef with AJ? Because it has to be something big to sideline a serious suspect.

You changed the words. I had a gut suspicion. Jeanne chimed in with hers. Jeanne specifically said it was the other head.

It was more serious than RVS. That was my point. I just found it suspect that you pursued that instead of a non-random suspect. That's not what I expect from a town Titus. But I can see scum Titus being very cautious and feeling things out. An Anen vote doesn't change that.

I didn't Jeanne did. Are you just not listening.

Titus pursues Eagle.

Jeanne RVSes AJ.

~Titus

This is green, and grey. green doesn't know what to do currently. Green is unhappy with this

- green

↑ Passionate Storm wrote:

↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:I don't like the thread right now.

Why? We're still in RVS mostly. I got a minor gut suspicion now but it's still RVS. You've been the focus, so why don't you like it?

Was this Titus or Jean?

Green, u want to post without knowing which head is which. Best to find scum first and establish ourselves as town.

- gray

↑ Spider Gwen wrote:

↑ Passionate Storm wrote:

↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:I don't like the thread right now.

Why? We're still in RVS mostly. I got a minor gut suspicion now but it's still RVS. You've been the focus, so why don't you like it?

Was this Titus or Jean?

Titus

~Titus

Titus (or PS, whichever you prefer)-
66 struck me as elaborating on 61, except pointing to it as something town would do. I'm thinking it's justified under the context of Gwen's question, though

Post 71 is green.

- green

↑ Passionate Storm wrote:

↑ Spider Gwen wrote:

↑ Passionate Storm wrote:

↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:I don't like the thread right now.

Why? We're still in RVS mostly. I got a minor gut suspicion now but it's still RVS. You've been the focus, so why don't you like it?

Was this Titus or Jean?

Titus

~Titus

Then yeah. It doesn't excuse anything. Why were you using RVS as an excuse to be cautious on pursuing Eagle?

↑ Errantparabola wrote:Eagle-

1) For clarification, are you actively claiming to be purposely withholding a vote in order to gauge reactions from people that notice it?
2) In response to your question, I post what I think I can bring to the table. If something has already been said, no need to say it again.

1. Yes.
2. Perhaps. But theory is not necessarily a wonderful thing to bring to the table, especially in RVS. At least, not in my opinion, but that is theory, so I'll stop there.

But now it's time for this:

VOTE: errantparabola

I didn't like the tunneling. But I especially didn't like the way he backed off at the end.

@Passionate Storm: who is green? Who is grey?

↑ Spider Gwen wrote:

↑ Passionate Storm wrote:

↑ Spider Gwen wrote:

↑ Passionate Storm wrote:

↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:I don't like the thread right now.

Why? We're still in RVS mostly. I got a minor gut suspicion now but it's still RVS. You've been the focus, so why don't you like it?

Was this Titus or Jean?

Titus

~Titus

Then yeah. It doesn't excuse anything. Why were you using RVS as an excuse to be cautious on pursuing Eagle?

I wasn't being cautious on the pursuit on Eagle.

↑ Errantparabola wrote:Titus (or PS, whichever you prefer)-
66 struck me as elaborating on 61, except pointing to it as something town would do. I'm thinking it's justified under the context of Gwen's question, though

That's accurate.

@Stormy: You seemed to be using RVS as an excuse.

↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:I didn't like the tunneling. But I especially didn't like the way he backed off at the end.

By all means, please explain how I backed off.
By the way, I still don't buy the reason you're not voting. At all.

↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:

↑ Errantparabola wrote:Eagle-

1) For clarification, are you actively claiming to be purposely withholding a vote in order to gauge reactions from people that notice it?
2) In response to your question, I post what I think I can bring to the table. If something has already been said, no need to say it again.

1. Yes.
2. Perhaps. But theory is not necessarily a wonderful thing to bring to the table, especially in RVS. At least, not in my opinion, but that is theory, so I'll stop there.

But now it's time for this:

VOTE: errantparabola

I didn't like the tunneling. But I especially didn't like the way he backed off at the end.

@Passionate Storm: who is green? Who is grey?

I think we'll keep that quiet. One of us at least would like to post anonymously without meta baggage at some point.

I don't get the errant vote.

~Titus

I think it's time for a d1 Titus wagon.

↑ Spider Gwen wrote:@Stormy: You seemed to be using RVS as an excuse.

No excuse. Just facts. You should go back and take a second look. Your first gripe was that we were not voting my gut suspicion (I was), that I abandoned my push to vote AJ (wrong Jeanne was chiming in with her read), that I was being cautious based on not pushing Eagle (wrong).

~Titus