Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 3:16 pm
SirCakez is so town right now.
Page 4 of 82
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 3:17 pm
Do you see any of those things in the first 3 pages?
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 3:17 pm
↑ BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Do you see any of those things in the first 3 pages?
I know I didn't.
Blueblooded is also town.
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 3:18 pm
No, which is why I questioned the massive wagon initially.
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 3:20 pm
OK, so you found no reasons to push a wagon anywhere and then questioned one when someone tried to get one going.
I'm not following the logic behind your actions at all. Do you propose we all sit back and wait for scum to make a scummy post?
I'm not following the logic behind your actions at all. Do you propose we all sit back and wait for scum to make a scummy post?
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 3:23 pm
Not necessarily. I was forming town reads and I was waiting to see where Night Hunters was going with their Zefiend push.
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 3:35 pm
VOTE: Cakey
-Dad
-Dad
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 3:41 pm
Dwlee what do you think of Zefiend actually? You never commented on it yourself.
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 3:42 pm
@zething, I cannot answer your question without knowing what you define as "normal" or having information about the roles in the setup. Whatever answer I give suggests something about my role as well. If I say, nope everything is normal (then we can infer that I have a normalish PR role). If I say I don't know, it suggests I have a VT PM. If I say it's wacky, the interference is I have a wacky PR.
Now, when you began coaxing in terms of Aeronaut as a mod, that's closer to an answerable question. Yet you can find it our yourself because I don't believe this is Aeronaut's first hosted game.
I liked the push back a fair amount, not thrilled with you by far but you're not my biggest suspect.
@Cakey,
You're hypocritical on wagons (go night hunters wagon but not massive), not stating your reads but engaging in pointless setup spec (47), advocating being passive in (74), looking for a bail out in (80).
~MamaBear
Now, when you began coaxing in terms of Aeronaut as a mod, that's closer to an answerable question. Yet you can find it our yourself because I don't believe this is Aeronaut's first hosted game.
I liked the push back a fair amount, not thrilled with you by far but you're not my biggest suspect.
@Cakey,
You're hypocritical on wagons (go night hunters wagon but not massive), not stating your reads but engaging in pointless setup spec (47), advocating being passive in (74), looking for a bail out in (80).
~MamaBear
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 3:44 pm
I thought the post mom had about zefiend was not alignment indicative but the join date + asking about rvs was weird.
-Dad
-Dad
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 3:48 pm
Wagons post-RVS should have something better to back them up then "we're never the same alignment". Its my opinion. Initial Night Hunters wagon was different because that was in RVS. 47 was a response to your "RVS wagons are outdated" thing which I find completely false. 74 and 80 were responses to questions.
If you want reads the town reads I was referring to were BBT and Night Hunters for active engaging of the game and early questioningg that was pretty town.
If you want reads the town reads I was referring to were BBT and Night Hunters for active engaging of the game and early questioningg that was pretty town.
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 4:17 pm
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 4:18 pm
~MamaBear
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 4:23 pm
I thought I unvoted, oops 
UNVOTE:
UNVOTE:
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 4:24 pm
SirCakez I got that strong town feel on.
I have to go against the NIght Hunters here. Don't agree at all.
I have to go against the NIght Hunters here. Don't agree at all.
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 4:25 pm
Firebringer if you could not have town reads on scum, that would be nice.
-Dad
-Dad
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 4:26 pm
I'm waiting for more players to show up, specifically massive and Zefiend, to show up before placing a new vote. Nothing is screaming scum to me right now.
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 4:26 pm
↑ Night Hunters wrote:Firebringer if you could not have town reads on scum, that would be nice.
-Dad
I have town read on town tho.
I am still unsure of you two.
Dwlee, what do you think of me so far?
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 4:26 pm
↑ Night Hunters wrote:Firebringer if you could not have town reads on scum, that would be nice.
-Dad
Now this post gives me pause.
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 4:29 pm
Nothing NIght Hunter has done so far has been alignment indicative for me.
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 4:34 pm
Fire why are you town reading me so strongly?
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 4:41 pm
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 11:56 pm
↑ SirCakez wrote:↑ BlueBloodedToffee wrote:What would you like wagons to be built on on page 3?
Fair enough.
↑ SirCakez wrote:↑ BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I mean, I find it weird that you wanted to wagon NH for no reason at all and then question a second wagon that actually has some reasoning (valid or otherwise) behind it.
We've exited RVS so I think wagons should have something legitimate to back them up now.
Walk me through your change in thought process here.
Why?
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 11:56 pm
VOTE: SC
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 2:35 am
I'm back from surviving in the woods (it's actually not that cold if you do everything right).
Sorry that I'm a little late, I'm just getting back into the swing of things.
I agree with BBT, SC has had a weird change in heart and only in less than a day. VOTE: SC
@kirroha, remember the game I replaced out of??? You asked me about RNGs and why I chose me when it landed on myself in RVS, check Newbie 1672.
Sorry that I'm a little late, I'm just getting back into the swing of things.
I agree with BBT, SC has had a weird change in heart and only in less than a day. VOTE: SC
@kirroha, remember the game I replaced out of??? You asked me about RNGs and why I chose me when it landed on myself in RVS, check Newbie 1672.