Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:11 am
hmmm gotta reread joushi but he's read noob town to me so far
I don't know. I'm not seeing it. I agree with the wall of text thing. It's better if people are to the point and condense what they want to say. I don't want to have to sit here and decipher what appears to be in another language.In post 58, ironstove wrote:I have a gut feeling that 1/2 or 2/2 of the players here are scum. I can see someone as a scum player writing this post sarcastically.In post 55, Transcend wrote:I like you tooIn post 53, Enefpe no Time wrote:I like this guyIn post 42, Transcend wrote:chill it with the walls please
a wall every once in a while is fine, but walling in every single post is going to make some players (me) not want to read you.
try condensing your posts
This does seem a little scummy. I don't know how anyone can be sure about anyone at this point. We're only on day 1 and there's very little to go on, except random voting and people nit-picking little things that may indicate scum or could mean nothing. So this stands out to me.In post 58, ironstove wrote:You sound nervous and you're deflecting the questions by implying I'm mafia for asking them... 100% scum.In post 50, Transcend wrote:There's no chance that I'm town that correctly town reads you?
Ehh, I don't see how that really indicates anything. But it is weird that Enefpe gives no reasoning for any claims made. Like he/she is trying to stir the pot or something and then just vanishes. Weird.In post 65, Skold wrote:VOTE: Enefpe no TimeIn post 54, Enefpe no Time wrote:Skold is pretty town.
In post 63, Joushi wrote:Care to elaborate? You made fairly sweeping accusations in 54 without a lot of quotes
In post 74, Enefpe no Time wrote:Innocent's reaction to me scumreading him is to weirdly focus on the fact that i townread skold. Evasive, tactical behavior. This dude is scum.
Skold is very non constructive in his tone, seems genuineish, hence town.
Joushi and innocent seem to be having weird interactions also
sweeping accusations without a lot of quotes
+In post 82, Enefpe no Time wrote:The way i do* above post was directed at joushi, last sentence @ soula
How is anyone supposed to agree or disagree with what you say if you give basically no explanation for it? I'm not saying what you're doing is scummy, I'm saying it's bad play.In post 81, Enefpe no Time wrote:You seem to be under the delusion that i am the type of player who makes walls or inclined to address every little non issue that arises. I actuall have given quite a bit of information about my stances, my playstyle, and why i think the way you do. I dont think any "accusations" were made perse, just some pretty on point observations. If you look at your interactions with innocent, they do feel weird. This is my opinion. Im sorry that this flusters you? Its actually quite scummy to insinuate that i have given "no" reasoning.
What specifically do you not like about his ISO?
He was spending a lot of time writing "IC stuff" and clarifying the basics of the game and very little time actually scum hunting. The scum hunting I do see from him seems flawed, in the sort of way a scum would see the game. That said, I've never played with him before, so it might just be his play style.
Will give you dog treat if you unvote me
Will give you dog treat if you unvote me.In post 85, Joushi wrote:Also Mori where are you
Xalxe, do we have a deadline on this player? I guess technically this is 24 hours though...
could you expand on this? my reread of his posts are kinda showing me an overeager IC more than scum. What are you seeing I don't?karnos wrote:The scum hunting I do see from him seems flawed, in the sort of way a scum would see the game.
Scoooooby snacks? You're currently still my #1 scumread, though. I'm rather convinced that you and EnT can't both be scum together though, as 53 is just too dumb to actually do as scum, but you two are definitely 1st and 2nd on the list.Transcend wrote:Will give you dog treat if you unvote me.