Unvote
Originally I was going to abstain from using teams whatsoever in my analysis and ultimately judgment of others in this game. Yet I am seeing signs that others do not agree with this philosophy so forgive me if I find that getting a general consensus on whether teams should be an influence is a higher priority than using my vote to put "pressure" on someone.
I am uncomfortable with the feeling that two people of equal suspicion, held in the mind, will be unbalanced simply because their name is the same color on a list as yours. I was absent for the team-choosing portion but here are some of my general thoughts:
I believe how the two "team-leaders" stepped up to rally players was an action borne of their personalities and are independent of whether they're town or scum. Pooky's nature is to lead a group of people (see Battle Royale) in courses of action. Vollkan is an excellent analyzer of behavior in both town and scum roles.
I have some problems with armix in his vacillation of whether or not he wanted to bandwagon me. I don't understand if it was because we were in "random voting" (rephrased as OMG LIKE LETZ GO CRAZY W/VOTING WHILE WE STILL CAN) or how he actually is.
I have some problems with Dean Harper only because page three is mostly full of off-topic junk from him. However, it would be hypocritical for me to criticize this short-run behavior from him when I myself don't agree with the logic behind his vote for me for apparently exhibiting behavior when I actually wasn't here/aware of being selected for this game.
I have some problems with Adel because of team-based bandwagoning. I'm not sure if my personal sentiments effect a universal flaw/scumtell/whatever because I know myself to currently:
A. not agree with team-based voting
B. not a member of those who think vote-hopping without merit to bandwagon is effective
Thus,
FOS: armix, Dean, Adel