basically a god of townplayIn post 68, mutantdevle wrote:I am not.In post 63, FIGHTING DREAMERS wrote:pedit: are you cognizant of whom ruby-Chan IS...
not actually a god, but basically a god
basically a god of townplayIn post 68, mutantdevle wrote:I am not.In post 63, FIGHTING DREAMERS wrote:pedit: are you cognizant of whom ruby-Chan IS...
aightIn post 74, mutantdevle wrote:Okay yeah, in my most recent scum game I can already see I said that I get townier the longer I live a fair bit. It's true though. You know I'm scum when I don't - as I didn't that game.In post 70, mutantdevle wrote:Probably, I will check though.In post 64, Ruby Red wrote:have you ever said this as wolf
Do you want me to link you my scum games?
In post 49, Blind Bandits wrote:i should smack u for putting me in the meta pile
im soulreading this town btwIn post 53, Blind Bandits wrote:i wish you could hear the sigh i just let out
In post 54, FIGHTING DREAMERS wrote:Purrcocet I do not comprehend why you would DISLIKE being easy to read as town but I possess congition that you CAN feel this way as town so... I will simply permit and let permit
we will be making a revolution for any free spirit willing to join, fuck u meanFIGHTING DREAMERS wrote:
Dost thou possess intendence to JOIN a patry?
meowRuby Red wrote:In post 49, Blind Bandits wrote:i should smack u for putting me in the meta pileim soulreading this town btwIn post 53, Blind Bandits wrote:i wish you could hear the sigh i just let out
u doing way too much ewNot Known 15 wrote:Hey.
I saidSTOP.
And I mean stop.
Stop every single conversation you are in.
In your next post you must acknowledge and accept the rules I have laid out.
As soon as everyone has checked in and acknowledged the rules I have imposed on this game we will continue.
Yes, scumhunting and conversation are very important. But establishing this much more townsided voting system isabsolutely necessaryif we want to have an acceptable chance to win.
In post 72, Not Known 15 wrote:1.We publicly decide on a candidate to be voted upon all by majority vote.(remember we don't need to vote for someone who actually is in campaign mode)
2.No one diverts from the candidate appointed by majority vote. Doing so is a claim that your vote(in your district) came from scum.
3.No one votes twice. Voting twice is a claim that these excess votes came from scum.
4.After the candidate is selected, we all discuss who shall be lynched. We will again decide by majority - unless the candidate is confirmed town.
5.If the president mislynches someone who was not selected they are scum.
6.Scum due to 1-5 and 7-8 must be lynched first. Only exceptions are guilty results.
7.An unconfirmed President who declines to lynch scum is scum.
8.False roleclaims and fake results come only from scum.
Code: Select all
My alignment is []
My party is called []
I/We should be president because []
My/Our policies are []
Players I am likely to execute are []
I'm theoretically in favor of this, except for a couple things.In post 72, Not Known 15 wrote: These are the(town imposed) rules we should play with:
1.We publicly decide on a candidate to be voted upon all by majority vote.(remember we don't need to vote for someone who actually is in campaign mode)
2.No one diverts from the candidate appointed by majority vote. Doing so is a claim that your vote(in your district) came from scum.
3.No one votes twice. Voting twice is a claim that these excess votes came from scum.
4.After the candidate is selected, we all discuss who shall be lynched. We will again decide by majority - unless the candidate is confirmed town.
5.If the president mislynches someone who was not selected they are scum.
6.Scum due to 1-5 and 7-8 must be lynched first. Only exceptions are guilty results.
7.An unconfirmed President who declines to lynch scum is scum.
8.False roleclaims and fake results come only from scum.
https://www.stuffbydavid.com/textcolorizerIn post 85, Edosurist wrote:Holy shit how long did it take you to color every single letter differently?
I like this idea in concept but I have my doubts that it is practical. From my experience, calling town to band together like this doesn't work (this experience being my last large theme which was rocky horror picture show).In post 72, Not Known 15 wrote:And...
Stop.
This whole voting system is manipulative, and slanted in the favour of mafia. The strength of the town is coordination.
These are the(town imposed) rules we should play with:
1.We publicly decide on a candidate to be voted upon all by majority vote.(remember we don't need to vote for someone who actually is in campaign mode)
2.No one diverts from the candidate appointed by majority vote. Doing so is a claim that your vote(in your district) came from scum.
3.No one votes twice. Voting twice is a claim that these excess votes came from scum.
4.After the candidate is selected, we all discuss who shall be lynched. We will again decide by majority - unless the candidate is confirmed town.
5.If the president mislynches someone who was not selected they are scum.
6.Scum due to 1-5 and 7-8 must be lynched first. Only exceptions are guilty results.
7.An unconfirmed President who declines to lynch scum is scum.
8.False roleclaims and fake results come only from scum.
some parts for meme value, most parts because i believe in myself and i know im townIn post 89, mutantdevle wrote:Ruby is it possible you could explain any more as to why you want to be president (if there is any more to be said) and what you would do with the power?
Not going to lie I did get this vibe from your earlier posts.In post 93, Ruby Red wrote:did you expect me to say "id hammer someone instantly" or something
what does this mean btw?In post 83, Ausuka wrote:I don't see much advantage in trying as hard as we can to make this a normal game of mafia with inconvenient lynching mechanics. I also don't see how electing obvtown and letting them kill without mafia evidence is worse than letting mafia vote and influence our lynch. Obviously we still do discussion as normal, just with the absence of voting for a lynch.
Personally, I would never limit the people who have a say in the lynch to just those in my party. I don't see anything to suggest that those who join me would be more likely to be town than those who didn't. By keeping the lynch discussion open to everybody it takes into account more reads which means more association tells and, in my opinion, a likely more on target lynch.In post 93, Ruby Red wrote:i would talk things out with the people in my party and then cast the vote
I think we should elect obvtown and let them have authority over the lynch, taking non-binding advice from the other players.In post 97, Ruby Red wrote:what does this mean btw?In post 83, Ausuka wrote:I don't see much advantage in trying as hard as we can to make this a normal game of mafia with inconvenient lynching mechanics. I also don't see how electing obvtown and letting them kill without mafia evidence is worse than letting mafia vote and influence our lynch. Obviously we still do discussion as normal, just with the absence of voting for a lynch.