Mafiascum.net

In post 37, Ircher wrote:

In post 35, Brandi wrote:wait i don't understand why someone is at L-1 already? There's not that many people in this game that seems dangerous.

Given that no one hammered yet, I think it is safe to assume either a) both scum are on town!Ceejay currently OR Ceejay is scum.

I'm not following your reasoning here. I don't think we can assume scum would auto-hammer if cj is town

---

In post 50, Brandi wrote:anti-town doesn't mean scum
i also appreciate miltank reaction gifs as much as the next person but i do hope this isn't it for N_M

he's also known sitewide for lolhammering

oh hey

pagetop!

ofrhz hi hi hi

I guess I'll pronounce ofrhz as ['o.vr̩^ɣz]. Thanks for not being helpful...

@Ircher: there are actually three scum in this game.

re:NMPL: I see the points pro & contra, but I don't think it's a worthwhile discussion. I think it's worth pointing out, though, that he's provided so far uncharacteristically much content. Is he always this defensive when he gets pushed?

it's pronounced ofrhz
loafers for the uninitiated I believe?

In post 77, the worst wrote:ofrhz hi hi hi

Hi hi

In post 78, Gosrir Elmer Odels wrote:I guess I'll pronounce ofrhz as ['o.vr̩^ɣz]. Thanks for not being helpful...

Not everything in this world is meant to be pronounced, my good man. But what the duckling said is good too

@Ircher: there are actually three scum in this game.

Do you think this was a real slip

Maybe cj is town

VOTE: saudade

In post 80, ofrhz wrote:

@Ircher: there are actually three scum in this game.

Do you think this was a real slip

I pretty sure it wasn't deliberate. I don't know how it's alignment indicative if it is that at all.

In post 80, ofrhz wrote:Do you think this was a real slip

I think it's too soon to talk about slips. >:
it'll be too soon for a long time

also, interesting vote
VOTE: Saudade

In post 82, Gosrir Elmer Odels wrote:

In post 80, ofrhz wrote:

@Ircher: there are actually three scum in this game.

Do you think this was a real slip

I pretty sure it wasn't deliberate. I don't know how it's alignment indicative if it is that at all.

I would like to note that "slips" like that in general tend to be non-alignment-indicative (despite how people tend to read that stuff).

ofrhz and I just finished a game a few weeks back where two townies unironically townslipped =_= but yeah it's better not to read into them too much

Now I'm getting paranoid about you, Irch, because I'm already paranoid about TW.

Anyhow, what do you all think about NM being active? 51 in particular is interesting. I don't agree with his point, but I think it was serious, so that makes it strictly game-related. All of this was sparked by a push on NM.
VOTE: Not_Mafia
(not policy)

In post 86, Ircher wrote:

When is deadline?

(expired on 2018-07-25 19:06:00) remain.

In post 87, Gosrir Elmer Odels wrote:Now I'm getting paranoid about you, Irch, because I'm already paranoid about TW.

Anyhow, what do you all think about NM being active? 51 in particular is interesting. I don't agree with his point, but I think it was serious, so that makes it strictly game-related. All of this was sparked by a push on NM.
VOTE: Not_Mafia
(not policy)

Why are you paranoid of The Worst and I?

That aside, I think Not_Mafia being active is more likely a sign that he is town than that he is scum. I am not in favor of lynching him at the moment.

You know piling up random votes on me is not gonna get you far

In post 51, Not_Mafia wrote:

In post 28, Quick wrote:Don't expect me to do much until NM is lynched, K thanks.

In post 49, Quick wrote:Well, since I believe playing as Town is mostly about creating content, I consider NM's playstyle to be very Anti-Town.

this is the best post in the thread so far and im all for punishing scum for inconsistancy

Your reaction to bring wagoned is consistent with your name, Saudade

In post 93, Ircher wrote:VOTE: Quick

Quite the sheep, you are.

In post 91, Saudade wrote:

In post 51, Not_Mafia wrote:

In post 28, Quick wrote:Don't expect me to do much until NM is lynched, K thanks.

In post 49, Quick wrote:Well, since I believe playing as Town is mostly about creating content, I consider NM's playstyle to be very Anti-Town.

this is the best post in the thread so far and im all for punishing scum for inconsistancy

Good luck with that cuz I do it a lot.

In post 87, Gosrir Elmer Odels wrote:Now I'm getting paranoid about you, Irch, because I'm already paranoid about TW.

Anyhow, what do you all think about NM being active? 51 in particular is interesting. I don't agree with his point, but I think it was serious, so that makes it strictly game-related. All of this was sparked by a push on NM.
VOTE: Not_Mafia
(not policy)

Sorta Scummy.

Quick would you say you're inconsistent?
(please answer "no" to prove your point)

Saudade how many scum do you think piled your wagon

In post 87, Gosrir Elmer Odels wrote: Anyhow, what do you all think about NM being active? 51 in particular is interesting. I don't agree with his point, but I think it was serious, so that makes it strictly game-related. All of this was sparked by a push on NM.
VOTE: Not_Mafia
(not policy)

Why is NM scum for this tho