o-m-g, con-fu-sion.
ok... so...
@Your Worst Nightmare: I am so very confused, did you or did you not have a second account? Is this account an alt? On another note, do you find incognito suspicious? how about gorrad? You seem to think their arguments are flawed at least.
@Gorrad: Are you saying you are willing to lynch Nightmare if he
does not
have an alt account? Or if he does? Or something else entirely?
Scotmany, to me, is pinging my scumdar. He states "It was not scummy at all. I was in no danger of being lynched, at all." which makes sense, but in my opinion, seems a bit too comfortable, as if a scumbuddy voted him and he knew he was fine. his posts thus far have been short and sweet, for the most part just passable as content, I don't like it.
there is a small exchange between tajo and sir tornado:
sirtornado wrote:populartajo wrote:sirtornado wrote:
unvote
I like your contributions so far.
Glad you do.
although very petty, I felt no need to mention any of tornado's content thus far, and for someone to do so makes me believe there is a connection between the 2.
Incognito wrote:Your Worst Nightmare wrote:Incognito wrote:Explain?
Because placing a forth vote on someone (and keeping it) after
10
posts of actual game is already scummy in of itself (considering that 7 votes ends the day).
Not
finding that somewhat suspicious is scummier still.
I'm confused by what you're trying to say here as well. You entered the game, noticed that Flameaxe placed a fourth vote on scotmany12 (which is something that you have now adamantly declared as scummy), and instead of placing a vote on Flameaxe (your so-called scummy-acting player) you placed a random vote on Patrick. And then when I question Mach-Mafia about his comment and subsequent vote on Flameaxe, you place a vote on me for the reasons you've now provided?
Something about this chain of events doesn't jibe well.
I like this little comment, I agree entirely with incognito's post here. this just doesn't sit well me with. Almost nothing Nightmare has done seems helpful in any sense. His language is sarcastic, maybe even cryptic, and overall slightly condescending. His actions don't make logical sense, and he defends himself in a hard to understand manner (see post 94), for the record, I understood, maybe, 10% of that post.