Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2018 1:30 am
Prodding pirate mollie and Gamma Emerald.
ceejayvinoya is V/LA until Jan 1st.
ceejayvinoya is V/LA until Jan 1st.
what at odd thing to get miffed at.In post 69, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:Not really. I was a bit miffed at mollie’s “5 post combo”, but I don’t think that says anything. Like I said before, it’s a bit early to have any substantial reads.In post 51, singletonking wrote:Yeah pretty much, and even the saying that we have gotten out of RVS is debatable. I really needed to find something to get the game going
Is there anyone you have a slight scumlean on?
this...might be a srs playstyle/join date/experience level clash. shiptoasting in a dead as lead game in order to attempt to bring some levity as well as to try to separate this very thing that you are complaining about.In post 70, singletonking wrote:Actually the only post I saw as awkward was the one where you felt the need to specify that your 'hi' was directed at me.In post 54, pirate mollie wrote:see, I knew if I picked a fight with some1 things get interesting.
I am just going to focus on the read you have on me for rnIn post 48, singletonking wrote:Ugh whatever I'm going to tryhard now
Ceejay I actually have a semi-decent townread on because I appreciate his efforts to scumhunt in 38, and backing up with reasoning in 45. However, I'm actually double guessing myself on this read here because I know ceejay isn't usually this towny early game.
GulityLion I'm not actually townreading him as much as I stated but still leans more town than scum for me.
Not_Mafia has only one post but I'm actually slightly sussing him for it, I feel the use of punctuation and capitals is uncharacteristic of him.
Jumble I actually slightly scumread unrelated to GuiltyLion, idk why but 41 pings me, the experience thing just feels off
InfiniteSoda I don't really see anything wrong with him
Suka has 1 naked RVS vote but it puts ceejay at L-2 so I do kinda dislike this
pirate mollie while being one of highest posters (!) has not much in content, but I think this is still NAI for now. Some posts I find awkward but 36 did mirror my thoughts
Gamma Emerald I also have no clue
so which post(s) do you find awkward? what is awkward about them?
the only thing that really stands out in this readslist is that this:
InfiniteSoda I don't really see anything wrong with him
so what exactly isrightwith soda person?
catching up as I go
You're actually right that my Soda read was the one I was the most lazy one, I tried semi-analyzing everyone's posts but skimmed his iso without analyzing much.
There's nothing right with Soda either, it's that because I had more than average number of scum in my list it inclined me to lean town on him at that point. However, his new post is pinging me a bit.
pick me! pick me!In post 72, singletonking wrote:Ok I'm definitely not going to follow you on this one, I disagree town won't necessary do what you described, and furthermore 5 is quite an arbitrary number. Do you have statistal evidence backing this up?In post 63, GuiltyLion wrote:alright, the time has come then! I didn't like how he entered the game with four players already being voted and decided to put his RVS vote on a fifth player. Could be someone too afraid to make waves by putting a second vote on someone.
lolIn post 75, Micc wrote:
Prodding pirate mollie and Gamma Emerald.
ceejayvinoya is V/LA until Jan 1st.
I wasn’t annoyed about the content of the posts, I was annoyed that you posted 4 one-liners in a row and then screamed that you had posted 5 times in a row.In post 76, pirate mollie wrote:this reads like you are getting actually pissy that I am trying to move the game forward. that is a weird as fuck thing to pick out, out of all of my posts.
Could you provide links to your games where this happened?In post 77, pirate mollie wrote: ms has moved into the a abnormally high scum win/town loss rate. it has never been this high and it is much than any site I play on. some of it is usual suspects, playstyle clashes, site meta clashes, etc. but there seems to be this new trend of lynching the loudest players d1, however derpy the lynch is.
innocent villager: hey I am the doc!
town: lets lynch them!
and then all of the decent players/power roles get nked, leaving the game with pple who either don't care or pple who play against their wincon for whatever and then town loses.
I have lost every game since I came back..every single one
it wld be really cool to win a game, don't you think?
you are the only other obvs!town in this game, I think we need to try to work together to build town cohesion.
so who else is in your townpool?
dl is 5 days away, and we do need to start consolidating.In post 75, Micc wrote:
these are the only 2 posts by this player.
you thought I was...In post 80, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:I wasn’t annoyed about the content of the posts, I was annoyed that you posted 4 one-liners in a row and then screamed that you had posted 5 times in a row.In post 76, pirate mollie wrote:this reads like you are getting actually pissy that I am trying to move the game forward. that is a weird as fuck thing to pick out, out of all of my posts.
Could you provide links to your games where this happened?[/quote]In post 77, pirate mollie wrote: ms has moved into the a abnormally high scum win/town loss rate. it has never been this high and it is much than any site I play on. some of it is usual suspects, playstyle clashes, site meta clashes, etc. but there seems to be this new trend of lynching the loudest players d1, however derpy the lynch is.
innocent villager: hey I am the doc!
town: lets lynch them!
and then all of the decent players/power roles get nked, leaving the game with pple who either don't care or pple who play against their wincon for whatever and then town loses.
I have lost every game since I came back..every single one
it wld be really cool to win a game, don't you think?
you are the only other obvs!town in this game, I think we need to try to work together to build town cohesion.
so who else is in your townpool?
hhmmIn post 83, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:UNVOTE: singleton VOTE: Suka
Going to follow on that one, I didn’t notice them at all until now.
Meant to respond to this but never didIn post 63, GuiltyLion wrote:alright, the time has come then! I didn't like how he entered the game with four players already being voted and decided to put his RVS vote on a fifth player. Could be someone too afraid to make waves by putting a second vote on someone.In post 59, pirate mollie wrote:@guilty lion- I anxiously await for you to expand on your "scumtell"
nah that's my way of trying to get more out of Jumble. And what do you think of how he responded to me?In post 61, Gamma Emerald wrote:@MollieIn this post specifically: had he written just the first line I’d have pretty much disregarded this. Him writing the rest just feels rather self-conscious.In post 21, GuiltyLion wrote:cause I asked them to!In post 19, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:Why would anyone follow you if they don't know what you're talking about?
I can't answer for why people would follow me or not you'd have to ask my hypothetical followers that question
Inactivity.In post 89, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why are people voting Suka btw?