Page 4 of 41

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 5:58 am
by themilkcartonkid
In post 72, Persivul wrote:
In post 66, Slaxx wrote:VOTE: Egix

5/5 on my read of you.
OK this is serious now, what's the reason?
This question needs to be answered and applies to rb as well

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 6:01 am
by Slaxx
UNVOTE:

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 6:02 am
by Slaxx
That was a reaction test on Egix and the fact a bunch of other people sheeped me and decided to start piling on while making sure to mention the lynch was mine probably means it flips town.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 6:04 am
by Slaxx
VOTE: Milk

Wanting to pressure the first two people on the wagon for blind votes on page 3 but ignore the Sheep. This is a good vote.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 7:05 am
by themilkcartonkid
They were 100% seeing where the pressure went, this makes no sense as a scumhunting vote. You are also ignoring sheep by this vote and this is super scummy VOTE: slaxx

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 8:41 am
by Persivul
VOTE: slaxx

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 10:10 am
by themilkcartonkid
In post 80, Persivul wrote:VOTE: slaxx
Why?

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 10:18 am
by TTTT
In post 79, themilkcartonkid wrote:They were 100% seeing where the pressure went, this makes no sense as a scumhunting vote. You are also ignoring sheep by this vote and this is super scummy VOTE: slaxx
my vote was not 100% "seeing where pressure went"
more like...
80% "seeing where pressure went"
20% "some men just want to watch the world burn"

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 10:19 am
by TTTT
what do you mean by "ignoring sheep"
and how is that super scummy?

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 10:52 am
by Egix96
VOTE: Persivul

Your two most recent votes have been naked sheep votes.
What's the deal with that?

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 11:34 am
by themilkcartonkid
In post 83, TTTT wrote:what do you mean by "ignoring sheep"
and how is that super scummy?
He accused me of not pressuring you and persivul while simultaneously not pressuring them either. That's called throwing shade.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 1:46 pm
by Persivul
In post 81, themilkcartonkid wrote:
In post 80, Persivul wrote:VOTE: slaxx
Why?
What you said.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 2:14 pm
by rb
VOTE: milk

yes we have founds the scums yes

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 2:16 pm
by rb
why is persivul so different this game

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 2:16 pm
by rb
r u teh scumz

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 2:39 pm
by Persivul
In post 88, rb wrote:why is persivul so different this game
No, the question is, why was I so different the last game?

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 7:01 pm
by volxen
Votecount 1.02

Egix96 (1): TTTT ()

BuJaber (0):

vivit (0):

TTTT (0):

themilkcartonkid (2): Slaxx (), rb ()

Lovebird (1): BuJaber ()

Slaxx (2): themilkcartonkid (), Persivul ()

Persivul (2): Lovebird (), Egix96 ()

rb (0):


No Lynch (0):

Not Voting (1):
vivit

With 9 players alive it takes 5 votes to lynch. If 5 players vote for a No Lynch, then the day will end early with no lynch.

Tree-stumps(0):



The deadline for Day 1 is in (expired on 2019-02-28 23:00:00).

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 8:07 pm
by volxen
vivit has been prodded.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 9:38 pm
by BuJaber
In post 74, themilkcartonkid wrote:I am 100% for pressure, but there isn't any real pressure here. What question or incident is being responded to here? If anything, we need to pressure slaxx or rb for their weird psuedo serious votes
This feels kinda LAMIST to me.

But also 5 votes on the first real wagon on the game.. that's gotta have scum on it. Like almost every game I play the first wagon that starts to look serious disappears later and someone else becomes the day 1 lynch so it's a safe vote for scum to park on.

There you go.. congratulations anyone who didn't vote for egix or is not milk.. you're town by PoE.

VOTE: Milk

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 9:39 pm
by BuJaber
In post 77, Slaxx wrote:That was a reaction test on Egix and the fact a bunch of other people sheeped me and decided to start piling on while making sure to mention the lynch was mine probably means it flips town.

Which part was the reaction test? The vote or the 5/5 thing?

Also what made him pass the test?

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:42 am
by themilkcartonkid
In post 93, BuJaber wrote:
In post 74, themilkcartonkid wrote:I am 100% for pressure, but there isn't any real pressure here. What question or incident is being responded to here? If anything, we need to pressure slaxx or rb for their weird psuedo serious votes
This feels kinda LAMIST to me.

But also 5 votes on the first real wagon on the game.. that's gotta have scum on it. Like almost every game I play the first wagon that starts to look serious disappears later and someone else becomes the day 1 lynch so it's a safe vote for scum to park on.

There you go.. congratulations anyone who didn't vote for egix or is not milk.. you're town by PoE.

VOTE: Milk
Can you explain how this is lamest? Also, what do you think about RBS tone?

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 4:00 am
by Persivul
In post 95, themilkcartonkid wrote:Can you explain how this is lamest?
Exactly what I was thinking.

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 6:33 am
by Lovebird
In post 79, themilkcartonkid wrote:They were 100% seeing where the pressure went, this makes no sense as a scumhunting vote. You are also ignoring sheep by this vote and this is super scummy VOTE: slaxx
Lol, the omgus.

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 6:36 am
by Lovebird
In post 88, rb wrote:why is persivul so different this game
In post 89, rb wrote:r u teh scumz
Ya, he's playing super weird. Like, he's scummy, but it looks almost intentional. So, I'm not sure what to think.

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 6:41 am
by Lovebird
Slaxx towny. Maybe egix and tttt too. I'm OK with my vote rn, but milk is good wagon that I might switch to.