No...In post 66, popsofctown wrote:DNS and Pine are the ones who please me far less
can I call DNS DNS server
You may not call us DNS. You can call Kings of the Town because we are Definitely Not Scum.
- OS
No...In post 66, popsofctown wrote:DNS and Pine are the ones who please me far less
can I call DNS DNS server
It might be a playstyle thing for tris. I need to see if she does this sort of thing in other other games. Thoughts on Princess Pops?In post 73, Pine wrote:If it were a joke, why hesitate? That self-consciousness rings false to me. Town doesn’t need to be inhibited during RVS, so the FOSes are super weird
Pops is usually a blatant read, but she hasn’t really started playing yet. Patience.In post 76, Definitely Not Scum wrote:It might be a playstyle thing for tris. I need to see if she does this sort of thing in other other games. Thoughts on Princess Pops?In post 73, Pine wrote:If it were a joke, why hesitate? That self-consciousness rings false to me. Town doesn’t need to be inhibited during RVS, so the FOSes are super weird
- OS
Congrats, you just lined yourself up as “likely scumbud #1”. The Town way to do that meta dive is to declare it simply non-meta, rather than imply it’s innocent.In post 77, Definitely Not Scum wrote:A quick meta dive says that tris doesn't do this as either alignment.
Scum in schadd micro: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=80729 and town in nmsa open: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=80894.
I won't be mentioning bit read until Day 3 glgl
Please don't answer for othersIn post 65, popsofctown wrote:She's thinks I'm the scummiest slot in the game, but doesn't want to put me at L-she hasn't counted.In post 63, GuyInFreezer wrote:Why an unvote there
Retaining an RVS vote doesn't reflect that stance.
I think that's a townie position.
See how I told you I can get reads this way
see
I'm not drinking sake btw
but I should look into where I could buy that
The real gem there is metaing with only one game per alignmentIn post 79, Pine wrote:Congrats, you just lined yourself up as “likely scumbud #1”. The Town way to do that meta dive is to declare it simply non-meta, rather than imply it’s innocent.
Isn’t that exactly what I did? I said she doesn’t do it as either alignment ergo not a meta thing.In post 79, Pine wrote:Congrats, you just lined yourself up as “likely scumbud #1”. The Town way to do that meta dive is to declare it simply non-meta, rather than imply it’s innocent.
No.In post 83, Definitely Not Scum wrote:Isn’t that exactly what I did? I said she doesn’t do it as either alignment ergo not a meta thing.In post 79, Pine wrote:Congrats, you just lined yourself up as “likely scumbud #1”. The Town way to do that meta dive is to declare it simply non-meta, rather than imply it’s innocent.
- OS
Oh fine. “She doesn’t do this” is in fact different from “It’s not a meta tell”. The first biases the reader to judge tris innocent by implying that her strange posting isn’t a pattern and therefore is genuine. The second is a neutral comment without predisposition.In post 85, Pine wrote:No.In post 83, Definitely Not Scum wrote:Isn’t that exactly what I did? I said she doesn’t do it as either alignment ergo not a meta thing.In post 79, Pine wrote:Congrats, you just lined yourself up as “likely scumbud #1”. The Town way to do that meta dive is to declare it simply non-meta, rather than imply it’s innocent.
- OS
The fuck are you talking about?In post 87, Definitely Not Scum wrote:You’re really stretching that interpretation to make yourself not look bad.
In post 90, Pine wrote:The fuck are you talking about?In post 87, Definitely Not Scum wrote:You’re really stretching that interpretation to make yourself not look bad.
If something is either meta or not meta, and then I say she doesn’t do it as either alignment, that pretty clearly falls into the not meta category.In post 90, Pine wrote:The fuck are you talking about?In post 87, Definitely Not Scum wrote:You’re really stretching that interpretation to make yourself not look bad.
Clearly you don't know how obvtowning works.In post 89, Definitely Not Scum wrote:Y’all are so bad at reading obvtown people. I expect it from GIF, but Pine.
When I see someone ask someone ask a question to actually sort a slot, man will I back off, I will go make an igloo and crawl inside and eat popsicles and come back out the next week when I'm sure the test is over, sanitized and unaffected.In post 81, GuyInFreezer wrote:Please don't answer for othersIn post 65, popsofctown wrote:She's thinks I'm the scummiest slot in the game, but doesn't want to put me at L-she hasn't counted.In post 63, GuyInFreezer wrote:Why an unvote there
Retaining an RVS vote doesn't reflect that stance.
I think that's a townie position.
See how I told you I can get reads this way
see
I'm not drinking sake btw
but I should look into where I could buy that
I'm only going to warn you once.
My defense of tris is not a defense. I don’t know why you and Pine have latched onto that word when I declared it nonmeta yet still voted her.In post 92, GuyInFreezer wrote:Clearly you don't know how obvtowning works.In post 89, Definitely Not Scum wrote:Y’all are so bad at reading obvtown people. I expect it from GIF, but Pine.
Obvtowning means one is towning up without doing odd shit.
Defending a player you are not familiar with by mentioning a playstyle from half-ass meta attempt with 2 games is hella odd at best.
If it wasn't why did you mention the possibility of the playstyle of the player you are unfamiliar with?In post 94, Definitely Not Scum wrote:My defense of tris is not a defense.
If you correctly guess what I was trying to do with that question, I'll gladly back off (Don't worry, I'm not that cheap to lie what I was thinking or was planning of doing).In post 93, popsofctown wrote:When I see someone shading a transparent progression with a quasi-rhetorical question I will take no such precautions.
Ok... and then I declared it wasn’t a playstyle thing... so did I defend her and then not defend her? Is that really what you’re trying to say?In post 95, GuyInFreezer wrote:If it wasn't why did you mention the possibility of the playstyle of the player you are unfamiliar with?In post 94, Definitely Not Scum wrote:My defense of tris is not a defense.
Like, "this behavior is (could be) a playstyle" is literally negating Pine's conclusion of "this behavior is scummy." If this is not a defense, I don't know what is.
Why did you put parentheses around could be when that’s what I actually said?In post 95, GuyInFreezer wrote:If it wasn't why did you mention the possibility of the playstyle of the player you are unfamiliar with?In post 94, Definitely Not Scum wrote:My defense of tris is not a defense.
Like, "this behavior is (could be) a playstyle" is literally negating Pine's conclusion of "this behavior is scummy." If this is not a defense, I don't know what is.
Key point here is that you declared the possibility of it being playstyle before you fact-check it. It reeks of rushed defense.In post 97, Definitely Not Scum wrote:Ok... and then I declared it wasn’t a playstyle thing... so did I defend her and then not defend her? Is that really what you’re trying to say?
And it's hella weird that you assumed that it was a playstyle before anything else.In post 97, Definitely Not Scum wrote:It could be not meta and also a playstyle thing. If tris did this as both alignments it would be not meta and a playstyle thing.